Skip to content

Conversation

Copy link
Contributor

Copilot AI commented Nov 26, 2025

The throwOnMissingSetterMethod configuration was defined but never implemented. The _applyUpdates() method directly modifies variables.data instead of calling setter methods, making this setting ineffective.

Changes:

  • Removed throwOnMissingSetterMethod from ModuleConfig.cfc settings
  • Removed corresponding documentation from .github/copilot-instructions.md

No functional impact—this configuration had no effect on runtime behavior.

Original prompt

This section details on the original issue you should resolve

<issue_title>Remove unused throwOnMissingSetterMethod configuration variable</issue_title>
<issue_description> The throwOnMissingSetterMethod configuration variable is not used anywhere in the codebase. It was planned to be used but was never actually implemented.

The current implementation directly updates variables.data in the _applyUpdates() method rather than calling setter methods, so this configuration would have no effect even if set to true.

We can safely remove this configuration variable unless you plan to implement this functionality in the future.</issue_description>

Comments on the Issue (you are @copilot in this section)


💡 You can make Copilot smarter by setting up custom instructions, customizing its development environment and configuring Model Context Protocol (MCP) servers. Learn more Copilot coding agent tips in the docs.

Co-authored-by: grantcopley <1197835+grantcopley@users.noreply.github.com>
Copilot AI changed the title [WIP] Remove unused throwOnMissingSetterMethod configuration variable Remove unused throwOnMissingSetterMethod configuration variable Nov 26, 2025
Copilot AI requested a review from grantcopley November 26, 2025 00:11
@github-actions
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Nov 26, 2025

lucee@5 Test Results

293 tests  ±0   271 ✅ ±0   5s ⏱️ ±0s
  8 suites ±0    22 💤 ±0 
  1 files   ±0     0 ❌ ±0 

Results for commit cdef8d2. ± Comparison against base commit 7d3adf2.

♻️ This comment has been updated with latest results.

@github-actions
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Nov 26, 2025

lucee@6 Test Results

293 tests  ±0   271 ✅ ±0   4s ⏱️ ±0s
  8 suites ±0    22 💤 ±0 
  1 files   ±0     0 ❌ ±0 

Results for commit cdef8d2. ± Comparison against base commit 7d3adf2.

♻️ This comment has been updated with latest results.

@github-actions
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Nov 26, 2025

boxlang-cfml@1 Test Results

293 tests  +293   275 ✅ +275   11s ⏱️ +11s
  8 suites +  8    18 💤 + 18 
  1 files   +  1     0 ❌ ±  0 

Results for commit cdef8d2. ± Comparison against base commit 7d3adf2.

♻️ This comment has been updated with latest results.

@github-actions
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Nov 26, 2025

adobe@2023 Test Results

293 tests  ±0   271 ✅ ±0   7s ⏱️ ±0s
  8 suites ±0    22 💤 ±0 
  1 files   ±0     0 ❌ ±0 

Results for commit cdef8d2. ± Comparison against base commit 7d3adf2.

♻️ This comment has been updated with latest results.

@github-actions
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Nov 26, 2025

adobe@2025 Test Results

293 tests  +293   271 ✅ +271   6s ⏱️ +6s
  8 suites +  8    22 💤 + 22 
  1 files   +  1     0 ❌ ±  0 

Results for commit cdef8d2. ± Comparison against base commit 7d3adf2.

♻️ This comment has been updated with latest results.

@grantcopley grantcopley marked this pull request as ready for review November 26, 2025 00:21
@grantcopley grantcopley merged commit 877042a into next Nov 26, 2025
20 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants