Adding Guenther-2022-30 from Concepticon#317
Open
MiraAhmedovic wants to merge 4 commits intomasterfrom
Open
Conversation
Collaborator
Author
|
I've refined the abbreviations for the languages in this list. |
AnnikaTjuka
reviewed
Feb 25, 2026
Collaborator
AnnikaTjuka
left a comment
AnnikaTjuka
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Thanks for adding all these variables. I have just a few comments.
| } | ||
|
|
||
| @article{Penfield1937, | ||
| title={Somatic motor and sensory representation in the cerebral cortex of man as studied by electrical stimulation.}, |
| @inproceedings{Jakubivcek2013, | ||
| title={The TenTen Corpus Family}, | ||
| author={Jakub{\'\i}{\v{c}}ek, Milo{\v{s}} and Kilgarriff, Adam and Kov{\'a}{\v{r}}, Vojt{\v{e}}ch and Rychl{\`y}, Pavel and Suchomel, V{\'\i}t}, | ||
| booktitle={7th international corpus linguistics conference CL}, |
Collaborator
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Please capitalise the name of the conference.
| pages={125--127}, | ||
| year={2013}, | ||
| address = {Lancaster}, | ||
| publisher = {UCREL} |
Collaborator
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Please spell out the name of the publisher.
| journal={New England Journal of Medicine}, | ||
| volume={317}, | ||
| number={17}, | ||
| pages={1098}, |
Collaborator
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Please add the pages.
| Amsel-2012-559 ENGLISH_AUDITORY_MEAN mean sensory modality auditory ratings users en The mean rating of intensity of sound produced by an object on an 8-point scale (1= not at all loud, 8 = extremely loud) given by participants. | ||
| Amsel-2012-559 ENGLISH_GRASP_MEAN mean sensory modality grasp ratings users en The mean rating of graspability ("How likely is someone to grasp this object with one hand?") on an 8-point scale (1 = extremely unlikely, 8 = extremely likely) given by participants. | ||
| Amsel-2012-559 ENGLISH_MOTION_MEAN mean sensory modality motion ratings users en The mean rating of likeliness of motion ("When one sees this object, how likely is it to be in motion?") on an 8-point scale (1 = extremely unlikely, 8 = extremely likely) given by participants. | ||
| Guenther-2022-30 ENGLISH_FREQUENCY tokens frequency norms corpus en Baroni2009 The total number of lemma occurences in the WaCKy corpus ([Baroni et al. 2009)](:bib:Baroni2009). The frequency for the item jaw and teeth was estimated as the sum of the frequencies for jaw and teeth. |
Collaborator
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I'd put "jaw" and "theet" in quotation marks. (also applies to the other rows)
| Dimitropoulou-2010-Frequency GREEK_CD_LOG logarithmic contextual diversity norms corpus el Log10 (contexts+1) of the different contexts (films and television series) a word appears in. | ||
| Kiritchenko-2017a-Valence ENGLISH_VALENCE_PERCENTAGE percentage valence best-worst ratings users en The mean rating of valence obtained through best-worst ratings (BWS). Participants were presented with 4-tuples (i.e., four different words from the list at once) and asked to select which word they found the most positive and which the most negative one. Each word occured multiple times in different 4-tuple formations but the same word never occured more than once within the same 4-tuple. The data was processed using the counting procedure: each term’s score was calculated as the percentage of times it was chosen as most positive minus the percentage of times the term was chosen as most negative. The scores range from −1 (most negative) to 1 (most positive). | ||
| Kiritchenko-2017b-Valence ENGLISH_VALENCE_MEAN mean valence ratings users en The mean rating of valence on a 9-point scale ranging from −4 to 4 (-4 = extremely negative, 0 = not at all positive or negative, 4 = extremely positive). The data was converted into scores ranging from 1 to 9, as presented here. No newline at end of file | ||
| Kiritchenko-2017b-Valence ENGLISH_VALENCE_MEAN mean valence ratings users en The mean rating of valence on a 9-point scale ranging from −4 to 4 (-4 = extremely negative, 0 = not at all positive or negative, 4 = extremely positive). The data was converted into scores ranging from 1 to 9, as presented here. |
Collaborator
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I think "as presented here" can be deleted.
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Adding Guenther-2022-30 from Concepticon, based on Language statistics as a window into mental representations by Günther & Rinaldi (2022).
This list is big in the sense that there's a lot of variables:
In
references.bib, there's only one page listed for Mosteller1987 instead of a page range. I could not access the original work to check, but various sources only list one page or a range only spanning one page for this source. In the original New England Journal of Medicine, it is also listed as only taking up one page, so I assume it is more like a (mathematical) diagram rather than an article in the classical sense.This PR also changed faulty
RATINGvalues innorare.tsvfor twoFREQUENCYvariables in Binder-2016-AffectiveRatings.