Skip to content

Comments

docs: update README.md for accuracy and standards#177

Draft
yacosta738 wants to merge 1 commit intomainfrom
docs/update-readme-accuracy-2960652682020426675
Draft

docs: update README.md for accuracy and standards#177
yacosta738 wants to merge 1 commit intomainfrom
docs/update-readme-accuracy-2960652682020426675

Conversation

@yacosta738
Copy link
Contributor

This PR updates the README.md to ensure accuracy and alignment with project documentation standards.

Changes:

  1. Installation Instructions: Updated the "From GitHub Releases" section to use <version> and <platform> placeholders in the bash script. This follows the requirement to use placeholders in URLs to prevent bit-rot.
  2. Explanatory Text: Added a mandatory explanatory sentence preceding the release download script that links to the GitHub Releases page.
  3. Formatting: Removed unnecessary blank lines inside code fences (e.g., in the "From Source" section) to maintain a clean appearance as per project standards.
  4. Verification: Verified that CLI commands, flags, and supported agents listed in the README match the current codebase.

Only README.md was modified in this PR, adhering to the "minimal update" and "single file" constraints.


PR created automatically by Jules for task 2960652682020426675 started by @yacosta738

- Replace hardcoded version with <version> placeholder in installation script
- Link to GitHub Releases page in manual installation instructions
- Remove unnecessary blank lines in code fences
- Ensure alignment with project documentation standards

Co-authored-by: yacosta738 <33158051+yacosta738@users.noreply.github.com>
@google-labs-jules
Copy link
Contributor

👋 Jules, reporting for duty! I'm here to lend a hand with this pull request.

When you start a review, I'll add a 👀 emoji to each comment to let you know I've read it. I'll focus on feedback directed at me and will do my best to stay out of conversations between you and other bots or reviewers to keep the noise down.

I'll push a commit with your requested changes shortly after. Please note there might be a delay between these steps, but rest assured I'm on the job!

For more direct control, you can switch me to Reactive Mode. When this mode is on, I will only act on comments where you specifically mention me with @jules. You can find this option in the Pull Request section of your global Jules UI settings. You can always switch back!

New to Jules? Learn more at jules.google/docs.


For security, I will only act on instructions from the user who triggered this task.

@coderabbitai
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Feb 15, 2026

No actionable comments were generated in the recent review. 🎉


📝 Walkthrough

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Documentation
    • Updated pre-built binaries installation guide with a more flexible template approach using placeholders for version and platform selection.
    • Revised instructions to direct users to the GitHub Releases page for accessing the latest available version.

Walkthrough

The README.md pre-built binaries installation section was rewritten to use placeholder-based instructions instead of hard-coded values. Users are now directed to GitHub Releases for the latest version, and extraneous blank lines were removed.

Changes

Cohort / File(s) Summary
Documentation
README.md
Rewrote pre-built binaries installation section to use generic placeholders (<version>, <platform>) instead of hard-coded values. Updated prose to reference GitHub Releases page and removed extra blank lines around code blocks.

Estimated code review effort

🎯 1 (Trivial) | ⏱️ ~3 minutes

Poem

🐰 Our words now dance with placeholders bright,
No versions fixed—let users find the light!
To GitHub's Releases they shall roam,
With templates open, they find their home.
A cleaner README, a fleeter read!

🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 4
✅ Passed checks (4 passed)
Check name Status Explanation
Title check ✅ Passed The title 'docs: update README.md for accuracy and standards' accurately reflects the main change—updating documentation for accuracy and standards compliance.
Description check ✅ Passed The description provides detailed context about the README.md changes, including specific updates to installation instructions, explanatory text, formatting, and verification steps.
Docstring Coverage ✅ Passed No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check.
Merge Conflict Detection ✅ Passed ✅ No merge conflicts detected when merging into main

✏️ Tip: You can configure your own custom pre-merge checks in the settings.

✨ Finishing touches
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
  • Create PR with unit tests
  • Post copyable unit tests in a comment
  • Commit unit tests in branch docs/update-readme-accuracy-2960652682020426675

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.

@github-actions
Copy link

✅ Contributor Report

User: @yacosta738
Status: Passed (12/13 metrics passed)

Metric Description Value Threshold Status
PR Merge Rate PRs merged vs closed 89% >= 30%
Repo Quality Repos with ≥100 stars 0 >= 0
Positive Reactions Positive reactions received 9 >= 1
Negative Reactions Negative reactions received 0 <= 5
Account Age GitHub account age 3033 days >= 30 days
Activity Consistency Regular activity over time 108% >= 0%
Issue Engagement Issues with community engagement 0 >= 0
Code Reviews Code reviews given to others 362 >= 0
Merger Diversity Unique maintainers who merged PRs 3 >= 0
Repo History Merge Rate Merge rate in this repo 0.8133333333333334 >= 0
Repo History Min PRs Previous PRs in this repo 81 >= 0
Profile Completeness Profile richness (bio, followers) 90 >= 0
Suspicious Patterns Spam-like activity detection 1 N/A

Contributor Report evaluates based on public GitHub activity. Analysis period: 2025-02-15 to 2026-02-15

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant