Skip to content

Conversation

@Nasf-Fan
Copy link
Contributor

The db_path maybe not contained inside the vos_path parameter, especially under md-on-ssd mode. Related go interfaces need to properly transfer cmdline options (db_path, write_mode, and so on) from control plane to the lower ddb utils.

The patch also adds more check for the vos pool open and close status before real VOS operation.

Features: control recovery

Steps for the author:

  • Commit message follows the guidelines.
  • Appropriate Features or Test-tag pragmas were used.
  • Appropriate Functional Test Stages were run.
  • At least two positive code reviews including at least one code owner from each category referenced in the PR.
  • Testing is complete. If necessary, forced-landing label added and a reason added in a comment.

After all prior steps are complete:

  • Gatekeeper requested (daos-gatekeeper added as a reviewer).

@github-actions
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Dec 24, 2025

Ticket title is 'ddb rm_pool failed to initialize sysdb under md-on-ssd mode'
Status is 'In Progress'
Labels: 'md_on_ssd,scrubbed_2.8'
https://daosio.atlassian.net/browse/DAOS-18381

@daosbuild3
Copy link
Collaborator

@daosbuild3
Copy link
Collaborator

Test stage Functional on EL 8.8 completed with status UNSTABLE. https://jenkins-3.daos.hpc.amslabs.hpecorp.net/job/daos-stack/job/daos//view/change-requests/job/PR-17312/1/testReport/

The db_path maybe not contained inside the vos_path parameter,
especially under md-on-ssd mode. Related go interfaces need to
properly transfer cmdline options (db_path, write_mode, and so
on) from control plane to the lower ddb utils.

The patch also adds more check for the vos pool open and close
status before real VOS operation.

Features: control recovery

Signed-off-by: Fan Yong <fan.yong@hpe.com>
@Nasf-Fan Nasf-Fan force-pushed the Nasf-Fan/DAOS-18381_test branch from 388b194 to b872331 Compare December 25, 2025 02:59
@Nasf-Fan Nasf-Fan marked this pull request as ready for review December 25, 2025 15:15
@Nasf-Fan Nasf-Fan requested review from a team as code owners December 25, 2025 15:15
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants