Skip to content

Conversation

@ThomasHenckel
Copy link
Contributor

Updated batch inference fields to match what is expected from the monitoring script Adding example of batch input table creation to the readme
monitoring-resource.yml expects model_id and timestamp and that predictions is not a string

Updated batch inference fields to match what is expected from the monitoring script
Adding example of batch input table creation to the readme
@ThomasHenckel ThomasHenckel changed the title Updates to readme, and batch inferance Updates to readme, and batch inference Jan 20, 2025
@ThomasHenckel
Copy link
Contributor Author

Hi @arpitjasa-db

What do you think, can this be merged, it fixes an issue when running the monitoring example

Copy link
Collaborator

@arpitjasa-db arpitjasa-db left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Hey @ThomasHenckel thanks for doing this! Left a few comments, but mostly looks good. Can you add a screenshot/link to an instantiated repo to confirm the whole flow works as expected?

Co-authored-by: Arpit Jasapara <87999496+arpitjasa-db@users.noreply.github.com>
@ThomasHenckel
Copy link
Contributor Author

Hi @arpitjasa-db thanks for the review comments, they have been applied.
I have created #195 and #196 to make it clear what the errors were, I have added a screenshot there of the workflow succeeding.

@arpitjasa-db arpitjasa-db merged commit 13a10eb into databricks:main Feb 21, 2025
1 check passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

monitored_metric_violation_check fails to find model_id Error in monitoring workflow

2 participants