-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 85
Expand dimod.make_quadratic documentation #1415
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Open
iamashwin99
wants to merge
6
commits into
dwavesystems:main
Choose a base branch
from
iamashwin99:patch-1
base: main
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
Open
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
6 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
2b9c399
Add example output for make_quadratic function
iamashwin99 548b385
Enhance docstring for make_quadratic function
iamashwin99 3103d0f
Update dimod/higherorder/utils.py
iamashwin99 708c4f1
Update dimod/higherorder/utils.py
iamashwin99 bb4f9bb
Update dimod/higherorder/utils.py based on JoelPasvolsky suggestion
iamashwin99 fb8aae9
Update dimod/higherorder/utils.py based on JoelPasvolsky suggestion
iamashwin99 File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
More readable and short.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I think the full bqm would be a better description. It would also give hint about how the auxiliary qubits are generated. What do you think?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Unless it provides high value to users (e.g., a list of parameters, typical timing), we try to avoid long outputs because they're not easy to parse, make the example look daunting, and can require maintenance (e.g., the recent backward-incompatible NumPy update that changes formats). My thinking is that such a short example lets users easily copy & paste so those who want to see the exact BQM structure can do so without difficulty. The list output highlights the generated variables you describe and additional, more robust ways to provide an output with more information could be
or
and even for the latter, preferably shorten it with ellipses for readability, something perhaps like:
Can one of these or another robust & short output do most of the work? If yes, that would be preferable. Thank you!