Skip to content

Add metrics for performance#6

Merged
el-dockerr merged 2 commits intodevelopmentfrom
feature/add-metrics-tests
Feb 4, 2026
Merged

Add metrics for performance#6
el-dockerr merged 2 commits intodevelopmentfrom
feature/add-metrics-tests

Conversation

@el-dockerr
Copy link
Owner

This pull request introduces a comprehensive performance metrics testing framework for GhostMem, including new tests, documentation, and automation scripts for both Windows and Linux. These changes make it easier to benchmark GhostMem's compression efficiency, memory savings, and performance overhead, and to track improvements or regressions over time.

Performance Metrics Testing and Documentation:

  • Added a new test suite for performance and compression metrics (test_metrics.cpp) and included it in the build process.
  • Expanded the README.md with detailed instructions on running all tests and performance metrics tests, and clarified the types of metrics collected. [1] [2]
  • Added a summary document (docs/METRICS_SUMMARY.md) to provide a quick reference for running metrics tests, interpreting results, and identifying optimization opportunities.
  • Introduced a comprehensive guide (docs/PERFORMANCE_METRICS.md) explaining each metrics test, key performance indicators, how to use metrics for improvements, and integration with CI/CD.
  • Updated the roadmap and documentation index in README.md to reference the new metrics guide and clarify test coverage.

Automation Scripts for Performance Testing:

  • Added run_metrics.bat (Windows) and run_metrics.sh (Linux) scripts to automate running performance metrics tests, saving results with timestamps, and summarizing key metrics for easy comparison. [1] [2]

@el-dockerr el-dockerr self-assigned this Feb 1, 2026
@el-dockerr el-dockerr added the documentation Improvements or additions to documentation label Feb 1, 2026
@el-dockerr el-dockerr changed the base branch from main to development February 4, 2026 06:18
@el-dockerr el-dockerr merged commit b26c7d9 into development Feb 4, 2026
4 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

documentation Improvements or additions to documentation

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant