Conversation
Summary of ChangesHello @reubenr0d, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed! This pull request introduces initial support for the 'arc_testnet' by adding its configuration to the Highlights
🧠 New Feature in Public Preview: You can now enable Memory to help Gemini Code Assist learn from your team's feedback. This makes future code reviews more consistent and personalized to your project's style. Click here to enable Memory in your admin console. Using Gemini Code AssistThe full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips. Invoking Gemini You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either
Customization To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a Limitations & Feedback Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here. You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension. Footnotes
|
📝 WalkthroughWalkthroughA new blockchain configuration entry named Changes
Estimated code review effort🎯 1 (Trivial) | ⏱️ ~3 minutes Poem
🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 3✅ Passed checks (3 passed)
✏️ Tip: You can configure your own custom pre-merge checks in the settings. ✨ Finishing touches🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. Comment |
![gemini-code-assist[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/956858?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Code Review
This pull request adds configuration for the arc_testnet in the sandbox environment. The contract addresses are placeholders as the contracts are not yet deployed. To prevent potential runtime errors, I've suggested disabling this blockchain configuration until the contract addresses are finalized.
| adjudicator: "0xBa28DC8F50d076Df76fF9959f31A320686faa373" | ||
| balance_checker: "0x714698e8fe7896bb84A46c0705944c4a48580819" | ||
| - name: arc_testnet | ||
| id: 5042002 |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The PR description mentions that the contracts are not yet deployed, and placeholder zero addresses are used. While this passes the configuration validation, it will likely lead to runtime errors when the application tries to interact with these contracts. To prevent this, it's better to disable this blockchain configuration until the contracts are deployed and their addresses are available. You can do this by adding disabled: true.
id: 5042002
disabled: true![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🤖 Fix all issues with AI agents
In `@clearnode/chart/config/sandbox/blockchains.yaml`:
- Around line 29-34: Add runtime zero-address checks in blockchain_config.go's
verifyVariables() so configs with contract addresses equal to
"0x0000000000000000000000000000000000000000" are rejected; specifically, after
existing regex/format validation, check bc.ContractAddresses.Custody,
bc.ContractAddresses.Adjudicator, and bc.ContractAddresses.BalanceChecker and
return a descriptive error (including bc.Name) if any equals the zero address so
downstream code such as channel_service.go never receives a zero contract
address.
| - name: arc_testnet | ||
| id: 5042002 | ||
| contract_addresses: | ||
| custody: "0x0000000000000000000000000000000000000000" | ||
| adjudicator: "0x0000000000000000000000000000000000000000" | ||
| balance_checker: "0x0000000000000000000000000000000000000000" |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🧩 Analysis chain
🏁 Script executed:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for zero address validation patterns
rg -n -C3 '0x0+\b|zero.*address|address.*zero|invalid.*address' --type=go --type=py --type=ts --type=jsRepository: erc7824/nitrolite
Length of output: 27330
🏁 Script executed:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for blockchain configuration loading/validation
rg -n -C3 'blockchains\.yaml|contract_addresses|LoadBlockchains|parseBlockchains' --type=go --type=py --type=ts --type=jsRepository: erc7824/nitrolite
Length of output: 3211
🏁 Script executed:
#!/bin/bash
# Find how the blockchains.yaml file is used
fd -e yaml | xargs grep -l blockchains
find . -type f \( -name "*.go" -o -name "*.py" -o -name "*.ts" -o -name "*.js" \) -exec grep -l "blockchains\|contract.*address" {} \;Repository: erc7824/nitrolite
Length of output: 1152
🏁 Script executed:
# Find the contractAddressRegex definition
rg -n "contractAddressRegex" clearnode/Repository: erc7824/nitrolite
Length of output: 983
🏁 Script executed:
# Look at the full validation logic in blockchain_config.go
head -70 clearnode/blockchain_config.go | tail -30Repository: erc7824/nitrolite
Length of output: 1521
🏁 Script executed:
# Check if zero addresses are used elsewhere in the sandbox config
cat clearnode/chart/config/sandbox/blockchains.yaml | head -50Repository: erc7824/nitrolite
Length of output: 1218
🏁 Script executed:
# Search for where contract addresses are used in actual code
rg -n "ContractAddresses|custody|adjudicator|balance_checker" clearnode/*.go --type=go -A 2 -B 2 | head -100Repository: erc7824/nitrolite
Length of output: 5837
🏁 Script executed:
# Look for contract call patterns and guards
rg -n "\.Call\(|\.Transact\(|contract.*address.*==" clearnode/ --type=go -A 2 -B 2 | head -80Repository: erc7824/nitrolite
Length of output: 4657
🏁 Script executed:
# Check channel service where contracts are likely used
cat clearnode/channel_service.go | head -150Repository: erc7824/nitrolite
Length of output: 5382
Zero addresses will load and be used directly without runtime validation.
The zero addresses in this configuration pass the format validation (regex: ^0x[0-9a-fA-F]{40}$) and will load successfully into the system. They are used directly in contract operations (e.g., in channel_service.go) without any checks preventing zero address usage. Any contract interaction will fail or cause unexpected behavior.
Add runtime validation to reject zero addresses at configuration load time:
Suggested validation in blockchain_config.go verifyVariables()
// After format validation, add zero address check
zeroAddress := "0x0000000000000000000000000000000000000000"
if bc.ContractAddresses.Custody == zeroAddress {
return fmt.Errorf("custody contract address cannot be zero address for blockchain '%s'", bc.Name)
}
if bc.ContractAddresses.Adjudicator == zeroAddress {
return fmt.Errorf("adjudicator contract address cannot be zero address for blockchain '%s'", bc.Name)
}
if bc.ContractAddresses.BalanceChecker == zeroAddress {
return fmt.Errorf("balance checker contract address cannot be zero address for blockchain '%s'", bc.Name)
}🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
In `@clearnode/chart/config/sandbox/blockchains.yaml` around lines 29 - 34, Add
runtime zero-address checks in blockchain_config.go's verifyVariables() so
configs with contract addresses equal to
"0x0000000000000000000000000000000000000000" are rejected; specifically, after
existing regex/format validation, check bc.ContractAddresses.Custody,
bc.ContractAddresses.Adjudicator, and bc.ContractAddresses.BalanceChecker and
return a descriptive error (including bc.Name) if any equals the zero address so
downstream code such as channel_service.go never receives a zero contract
address.
1 participant
Contract are yet to be deployed; for Hackmoney.
Summary by CodeRabbit
Release Notes