Skip to content

Comments

functional-tester: add logging statement#1

Open
fanminshi wants to merge 2 commits intomasterfrom
network_timeout_debug
Open

functional-tester: add logging statement#1
fanminshi wants to merge 2 commits intomasterfrom
network_timeout_debug

Conversation

@fanminshi
Copy link
Owner

add logging statement for network injection code

add logging statement for network injection code
fanminshi added a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 27, 2017
This pr adds a check in compaction to ensure that setting keep to nil only if this is the latest compaction in queue and
merges the keep from prev ongoing compaction to this scheduled compaction allows HashKV to computes Hash from previous keep.

Scenario #1

Suppose that HashKV() starts after compact(A) and compact(B) has scheduled and after
completion of compact(A) but before the completion of compact(B).

Before this PR:
Completion of compact(A) sets keep to nil to indicate that there are no ongoing compactions.
This assumption causes HashKV to hash all mvcc keys including keys that
hasn't been deleted by compact(B) up to a rev. Hence, HashKV again after compact(B) returns
a different Hash that during compact(B).

After this PR:
Completion of compact(A) sets keep to nil if current compactRev == compactRev(compact(A)).
Since calling compact(B) changes current compactRev, then current compactRev != compactRev(compact(A)).
Then HashKV will base on the keep set during compact(B) instead of nil which return the correct hash
during compact(B).

Scenario etcd-io#2

Suppose that HashKV() starts after compact(A) and compact(B) has scheduled and before the
completion of compact(A) and compact(B).

Before this PR:
The start of compact(B) sets keep to compact(B) and overrides the keep from compact(A).
Since compact(A) hasn't finished yet, HashKV needs to hash revision from keep of compact(A) but it
is overridden. Hence HashKV misses revision from keep of compact(A) would result hash difference.

After this PR:
The start of compact(B) merges keep from compact(B) and compact(A). Even though compact(A) hasn't finished,
HashKV can retrieve from keep of compact(A). Hence HashKV doesn't miss any revisions and will compute Hash correctly.
fanminshi added a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 27, 2017
This pr adds a check in compaction to ensure that setting keep to nil only if this is the latest compaction in queue and
merges the keep from prev ongoing compaction to this scheduled compaction allows HashKV to computes Hash from previous keep.

Scenario #1

Suppose that HashKV() starts after compact(A) and compact(B) has scheduled and after
completion of compact(A) but before the completion of compact(B).

Before this PR:
Completion of compact(A) sets keep to nil to indicate that there are no ongoing compactions.
This assumption causes HashKV to hash all mvcc keys including keys that
hasn't been deleted by compact(B) up to a rev. Hence, HashKV again after compact(B) returns
a different Hash that during compact(B).

After this PR:
Completion of compact(A) sets keep to nil if current compactRev == compactRev(compact(A)).
Since calling compact(B) changes current compactRev, then current compactRev != compactRev(compact(A)).
Then HashKV will base on the keep set during compact(B) instead of nil which return the correct hash
during compact(B).

Scenario etcd-io#2

Suppose that HashKV() starts after compact(A) and compact(B) has scheduled and before the
completion of compact(A) and compact(B).

Before this PR:
The start of compact(B) sets keep to compact(B) and overrides the keep from compact(A).
Since compact(A) hasn't finished yet, HashKV needs to hash revision from keep of compact(A) but it
is overridden. Hence HashKV misses revision from keep of compact(A) would result hash difference.

After this PR:
The start of compact(B) merges keep from compact(B) and compact(A). Even though compact(A) hasn't finished,
HashKV can retrieve from keep of compact(A). Hence HashKV doesn't miss any revisions and will compute Hash correctly.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant