Added Gevent pywsgi support & ApacheBench results #6
Conversation
Hi, you did a nice job with fiole despite alpha status. Before I found your project, I though as well to merge a speed of wheezy with lean syntax / simplicity / features of itty, flask.... ;-) I have tried some simple benchmarks with a demo " hello word" app. With "gevent server" patch, the results were rather impressive. ApacheBech results: Concurrency Level: 100 Time taken for tests: 2.794 seconds Complete requests: 10000 Failed requests: 0 Total transferred: 1470000 bytes HTML transferred: 120000 bytes Requests per second: 3578.54 [#/sec] (mean) Time per request: 27.944 [ms] (mean) Time per request: 0.279 [ms] (mean, across all concurrent requests) Transfer rate: 513.72 [Kbytes/sec] received Setup: App server as well as ApacheBench running from the same computer (Notebook Lenovo u310 with Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-3517U CPU @ 1.90GHz, OS: Ubuntu 14.04 x64, Python 2.7 x64)
With suppresed console logging reached 8k Rps.
ms@ms-Lenovo-U310:~$ ab -c 1000 -n 10000 localhost:8080/
Server Software: Bjoern
Server Hostname: localhost
Server Port: 8080
Document Path: /
Document Length: 12 bytes
Concurrency Level: 1000
Time taken for tests: 1.218 seconds
Complete requests: 10000
Failed requests: 0
Total transferred: 1100000 bytes
HTML transferred: 120000 bytes
Requests per second: 8209.94 [#/sec] (mean)
Time per request: 121.804 [ms] (mean)
Time per request: 0.122 [ms] (mean, across all concurrent requests)
Transfer rate: 881.93 [Kbytes/sec] received
Connection Times (ms)
min mean[+/-sd] median max
Connect: 0 3 8.8 0 38
Processing: 9 20 17.5 15 423
Waiting: 9 19 16.3 15 423
Total: 9 23 24.6 15 424
Percentage of the requests served within a certain time (ms)
50% 15
66% 15
75% 15
80% 15
90% 67
95% 89
98% 103
99% 112
100% 424 (longest request)
|
Martin, thank you for your benchmark. Is there any benefit to add adapters for each third-party server in Fiole? I see that Bottle and some other projects do this, but I don't see why we need it at all. It's quite simple to add this in user code, for example. I wrote a small line in the FAQ for it http://fiole.readthedocs.org/en/latest/developer.html#how-much-is-it-extensible
Maybe it makes sense to extend this with a section in the documentation with example snippet(s) for Björn or Gevent, and add a mention about the performance benefit? |
|
I think it is a convenience issue. I believe for a newbie (or pragmatic programmer with a deadline) it would be more convenient to have basic adapters included (not only for wsgi, but other most common functionilites e.g. beaker that are missing). I believe that short learning curve and flexibility is one of reasons why people with opt for micro-framework... Nevertheless I understand and fully respect your point to keep your core code lean. So, what can be done is follows:
Let me know which of those to focus. |
2 participants
Hi, you did a nice job with fiole despite alpha status.
Before I found your project, I though as well to merge a speed of wheezy with lean syntax / simplicity / features of itty, flask.... ;-)
I have tried some simple benchmarks with a demo " hello word" app.
With "gevent server" patch, the results were rather impressive.
ApacheBech results:
Concurrency Level: 100
Time taken for tests: 2.794 seconds
Complete requests: 10000
Failed requests: 0
Total transferred: 1470000 bytes
HTML transferred: 120000 bytes
Requests per second: 3578.54 #/sec (mean)
Time per request: 27.944 ms (mean)
Time per request: 0.279 sec. (mean, across all concurrent requests)
Transfer rate: 513.72 Kbytes/sec received
Setup: App server running at localhost callback, ApacheBenchmark running from the same computer (Notebook Lenovo u310 with Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-3517U CPU @ 1.90GHz, OS: Ubuntu 14.04 x64, Python 2.7 x64)