Skip to content

[Snyk] Upgrade axios from 1.2.1 to 1.8.4#2474

Open
lucaskjaero wants to merge 1 commit intomainfrom
snyk-upgrade-d75f9b3e61c4b8dc82d58570d9dd0f64
Open

[Snyk] Upgrade axios from 1.2.1 to 1.8.4#2474
lucaskjaero wants to merge 1 commit intomainfrom
snyk-upgrade-d75f9b3e61c4b8dc82d58570d9dd0f64

Conversation

@lucaskjaero
Copy link
Contributor

snyk-top-banner

Snyk has created this PR to upgrade axios from 1.2.1 to 1.8.4.

ℹ️ Keep your dependencies up-to-date. This makes it easier to fix existing vulnerabilities and to more quickly identify and fix newly disclosed vulnerabilities when they affect your project.


  • The recommended version is 42 versions ahead of your current version.

  • The recommended version was released a month ago.

Issues fixed by the recommended upgrade:

Issue Score Exploit Maturity
high severity Prototype Pollution
SNYK-JS-AXIOS-6144788
646 No Known Exploit
high severity Improper Handling of Extra Parameters
SNYK-JS-FOLLOWREDIRECTS-6141137
646 Proof of Concept
medium severity Information Exposure
SNYK-JS-FOLLOWREDIRECTS-6444610
646 Proof of Concept
Release notes
Package name: axios from axios GitHub release notes

Important

  • Check the changes in this PR to ensure they won't cause issues with your project.
  • This PR was automatically created by Snyk using the credentials of a real user.
  • Max score is 1000. Note that the real score may have changed since the PR was raised.

Note: You are seeing this because you or someone else with access to this repository has authorized Snyk to open upgrade PRs.

For more information:

Snyk has created this PR to upgrade axios from 1.2.1 to 1.8.4.

See this package in npm:
axios

See this project in Snyk:
https://app.snyk.io/org/lkjaero/project/4e8f9de2-6270-41cf-b0b3-e9c4c8de3da2?utm_source=github&utm_medium=referral&page=upgrade-pr
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants