Skip to content

Conversation

@adity1raut
Copy link
Contributor

@adity1raut adity1raut commented Jan 21, 2026

…tionalities

Ⅰ. Describe what this PR does

  • test(dump): add comprehensive tests for stack trace and coredump functionalities

Ⅱ. Does this pull request fix one issue?

Part of #5407

Ⅲ. List the added test cases (unit test/integration test) if any, please explain if no tests are needed.

Ⅳ. Describe how to verify it

Ⅴ. Special notes for reviews

Screenshot From 2026-01-21 11-25-41

…tionalities

Signed-off-by: adity1raut <araut7798@gmail.com>
@fluid-e2e-bot
Copy link

fluid-e2e-bot bot commented Jan 21, 2026

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by:
Once this PR has been reviewed and has the lgtm label, please assign trafalgarzzz for approval by writing /assign @trafalgarzzz in a comment. For more information see:The Kubernetes Code Review Process.

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

Details Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@gemini-code-assist
Copy link
Contributor

Summary of Changes

Hello @adity1raut, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!

This pull request significantly enhances the test coverage for the dump package by introducing a new, comprehensive test suite. These tests validate the core functionalities of stack trace generation, coredump creation, and the signal-driven goroutine dump mechanism, ensuring robustness and correctness across various scenarios.

Highlights

  • Comprehensive Stack Trace Tests: Added extensive unit tests for the StackTrace function, covering scenarios for all goroutines, current goroutine, and verifying buffer growth for large stack traces.
  • Goroutine Dump Generator Validation: Introduced tests for the InstallgoroutineDumpGenerator function, ensuring its idempotent initialization and proper response to SIGQUIT signals, including the creation of dump files.
  • Coredump Functionality Tests: Implemented tests to validate the coredump function, verifying correct file creation, content integrity, and graceful handling of potential write errors.
  • Dumpfile Path Formatting Tests: Included tests for the formatDumpfile helper function to confirm accurate construction of dump file paths under various conditions.

🧠 New Feature in Public Preview: You can now enable Memory to help Gemini Code Assist learn from your team's feedback. This makes future code reviews more consistent and personalized to your project's style. Click here to enable Memory in your admin console.

Using Gemini Code Assist

The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.

Invoking Gemini

You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands on the current page.

Feature Command Description
Code Review /gemini review Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state.
Pull Request Summary /gemini summary Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state.
Comment @gemini-code-assist Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in pull request comments and review comments.
Help /gemini help Displays a list of available commands.

Customization

To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.

Limitations & Feedback

Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here.

You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.

Footnotes

  1. Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution.

@fluid-e2e-bot
Copy link

fluid-e2e-bot bot commented Jan 21, 2026

Hi @adity1raut. Thanks for your PR.

I'm waiting for a fluid-cloudnative member to verify that this patch is reasonable to test. If it is, they should reply with /ok-to-test on its own line. Until that is done, I will not automatically test new commits in this PR, but the usual testing commands by org members will still work. Regular contributors should join the org to skip this step.

Once the patch is verified, the new status will be reflected by the ok-to-test label.

I understand the commands that are listed here.

Details

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

…tionalities

Signed-off-by: adity1raut <araut7798@gmail.com>
Copy link
Contributor

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Code Review

This pull request introduces a comprehensive test suite for the dump package, covering stack traces, signal-triggered goroutine dumps, and coredump creation. This is a valuable addition. My review focuses on enhancing the robustness and maintainability of these new tests. I've provided suggestions to eliminate redundant test cases, strengthen weak assertions, and adopt Go best practices for file path and string manipulation to create a cleaner and more reliable test suite.

…tionalities

Signed-off-by: adity1raut <araut7798@gmail.com>
@adity1raut
Copy link
Contributor Author

/cc @cheyang @RongGu

@fluid-e2e-bot fluid-e2e-bot bot requested review from RongGu and cheyang January 21, 2026 06:11
…d edge cases

Signed-off-by: adity1raut <araut7798@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: adity1raut <araut7798@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: adity1raut <araut7798@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: adity1raut <araut7798@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: adity1raut <araut7798@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: adity1raut <araut7798@gmail.com>
@sonarqubecloud
Copy link

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Jan 23, 2026

Codecov Report

❌ Patch coverage is 92.30769% with 2 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.
✅ Project coverage is 56.89%. Comparing base (7b2a096) to head (838810a).
⚠️ Report is 14 commits behind head on master.

Files with missing lines Patch % Lines
pkg/dump/dump.go 92.30% 2 Missing ⚠️
Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master    #5434      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   57.46%   56.89%   -0.57%     
==========================================
  Files         443      443              
  Lines       30735    30738       +3     
==========================================
- Hits        17661    17488     -173     
- Misses      11460    11694     +234     
+ Partials     1614     1556      -58     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
  • 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant