Conversation
|
Note Currently processing new changes in this PR. This may take a few minutes, please wait... 📒 Files selected for processing (1)
Tip CodeRabbit can generate a title for your PR based on the changes.Add @coderabbitai placeholder anywhere in the title of your PR and CodeRabbit will replace it with a title based on the changes in the PR. You can change the placeholder by changing the Note
|
|
Note Unit test generation is an Early Access feature. Expect some limitations and changes as we gather feedback and continue to improve it. Generating unit tests... This may take up to 20 minutes. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 4
🤖 Fix all issues with AI agents
In @.coderabbit.yaml:
- Line 65: Fix the Korean typo in the .coderabbit.yaml content by replacing "이떄"
with the correct form "이때" in the sentence that references HttpResponseUtils
(the line mentioning "이떄, `HttpResponseUtils` 클래스를 활용하여 일관된 응답 구조를 유지하는지
확인해주세요.").
- Around line 108-109: Replace the incorrect kebab-case key `osv-scanner` with
the schema-expected camelCase `osvScanner` so the tool setting is recognized
(preserve the nested `enabled: true` value); update any occurrences of
`osv-scanner` in this file to `osvScanner` including the top-level mapping used
to configure the OSV Scanner.
- Around line 91-100: The pre_merge_checks block is at the root level but must
be nested under the reviews section; move the entire pre_merge_checks mapping so
it is a child of reviews (ensure proper indentation and YAML structure) and
remove any duplicate root-level pre_merge_checks entries so the config under
reviews.pre_merge_checks (including title, description, docstrings,
issue_assessment and threshold) is applied.
- Around line 104-131: The `tools` section is at root level but must be nested
under the `reviews` key per schema; move the entire `tools:` block so it is a
child of `reviews:` (adjust indentation accordingly), ensuring YAML remains
valid (preserve all tool entries like gitleaks, osv-scanner, pmd, hadolint,
checkov, markdownlint, actionlint, yamllint, github-checks) and update any
CI/validation configs if they reference the previous path.
🧹 Nitpick comments (2)
.coderabbit.yaml (2)
34-34: 테스트 코드 제외에 대한 고려 사항
**/test/**경로를 리뷰에서 제외하면 테스트 코드의 품질 문제(잘못된 assertion, 불완전한 mock 설정 등)를 놓칠 수 있습니다. 1인 개발 환경에서 테스트 코드는 특히 중요한 안전망 역할을 하므로, 필요시 이 필터를 제거하는 것을 고려해 보세요.
72-74: 가독성 개선: 섹션 간 빈 줄 추가 권장
path_instructions의 마지막 항목과chat:섹션 사이에 빈 줄이 없어 시각적으로 구분이 어렵습니다. YAML 문법상 문제는 없지만, 가독성을 위해 섹션 간 빈 줄을 추가하는 것을 권장합니다.♻️ 수정 제안
2. **Sentry Context**: 예외 처리(`catch`) 블록이나 중요 비즈니스 로직(결제, 공부 종료 등)에서 `Sentry.setUser()` 또는 `Sentry.setContext()`를 통해 디버깅 정보를 남기고 있는지 확인해주세요. 단순히 `log.error()`만 찍는 경우 Sentry 활용을 제안해주세요. + chat: auto_reply: true
|
|
||
| ### Response Type | ||
| - 반환 타입은 항상 `ResponseEntity<ApiResponse<T>>` 형태의 통일된 응답 포맷을 권장합니다. | ||
| - 이떄, `HttpResponseUtils` 클래스를 활용하여 일관된 응답 구조를 유지하는지 확인해주세요. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
오타 수정 필요
"이떄"는 "이때"의 오타입니다.
✏️ 수정 제안
- - 이떄, `HttpResponseUtils` 클래스를 활용하여 일관된 응답 구조를 유지하는지 확인해주세요.
+ - 이때, `HttpResponseUtils` 클래스를 활용하여 일관된 응답 구조를 유지하는지 확인해주세요.📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| - 이떄, `HttpResponseUtils` 클래스를 활용하여 일관된 응답 구조를 유지하는지 확인해주세요. | |
| - 이때, `HttpResponseUtils` 클래스를 활용하여 일관된 응답 구조를 유지하는지 확인해주세요. |
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
In @.coderabbit.yaml at line 65, Fix the Korean typo in the .coderabbit.yaml
content by replacing "이떄" with the correct form "이때" in the sentence that
references HttpResponseUtils (the line mentioning "이떄, `HttpResponseUtils` 클래스를
활용하여 일관된 응답 구조를 유지하는지 확인해주세요.").
| pre_merge_checks: | ||
| title: | ||
| mode: "warning" | ||
| description: | ||
| mode: "warning" | ||
| docstrings: | ||
| mode: "warning" | ||
| threshold: 50 # 문서화 커버리지 50% 권장 | ||
| issue_assessment: | ||
| mode: "warning" # 연결된 이슈 해결 여부 확인 |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
pre_merge_checks가 잘못된 위치에 있습니다
스키마에 따르면 pre_merge_checks는 reviews 섹션 아래에 중첩되어야 합니다. 현재 루트 레벨에 위치해 있어 설정이 적용되지 않을 수 있습니다.
🔧 수정 제안
reviews:
profile: "chill"
# ... 다른 reviews 설정들 ...
+
+ # 병합 전 체크 (스스로를 위한 안전장치)
+ pre_merge_checks:
+ title:
+ mode: "warning"
+ description:
+ mode: "warning"
+ docstrings:
+ mode: "warning"
+ threshold: 50
+ issue_assessment:
+ mode: "warning"
-# 병합 전 체크 (스스로를 위한 안전장치)
-pre_merge_checks:
- title:
- mode: "warning"
- description:
- mode: "warning"
- docstrings:
- mode: "warning"
- threshold: 50
- issue_assessment:
- mode: "warning"🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
In @.coderabbit.yaml around lines 91 - 100, The pre_merge_checks block is at the
root level but must be nested under the reviews section; move the entire
pre_merge_checks mapping so it is a child of reviews (ensure proper indentation
and YAML structure) and remove any duplicate root-level pre_merge_checks entries
so the config under reviews.pre_merge_checks (including title, description,
docstrings, issue_assessment and threshold) is applied.
| tools: | ||
| # 보안 필수 (혼자 개발할 때 키 유출 실수가 잦음) | ||
| gitleaks: | ||
| enabled: true | ||
| osv-scanner: # 의존성 취약점 스캔 | ||
| enabled: true | ||
|
|
||
| # Java 정적 분석 | ||
| pmd: | ||
| enabled: true | ||
|
|
||
| # 인프라 (Docker) | ||
| hadolint: | ||
| enabled: true # Dockerfile 린트 | ||
| checkov: | ||
| enabled: true # IaC 보안 점검 | ||
|
|
||
| # 기타 유용한 툴 | ||
| markdownlint: | ||
| enabled: true | ||
| actionlint: | ||
| enabled: true # GitHub Actions 린트 | ||
| yamllint: | ||
| enabled: true | ||
|
|
||
| # GitHub Checks 통합 (PR 하단에서 상태 확인 가능) | ||
| github-checks: | ||
| enabled: true |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
tools 섹션이 잘못된 위치에 있습니다
스키마에 따르면 tools는 reviews 섹션 아래에 중첩되어야 합니다. 현재 루트 레벨에 위치해 있어 정적 분석 도구 설정이 적용되지 않습니다.
🔧 수정 제안 - tools를 reviews 아래로 이동
reviews:
profile: "chill"
# ... 다른 reviews 설정들 ...
+
+ # 툴 설정 (정적 분석 및 보안)
+ tools:
+ gitleaks:
+ enabled: true
+ osvScanner:
+ enabled: true
+ pmd:
+ enabled: true
+ hadolint:
+ enabled: true
+ checkov:
+ enabled: true
+ markdownlint:
+ enabled: true
+ actionlint:
+ enabled: true
+ yamllint:
+ enabled: true
+ github-checks:
+ enabled: true
-# 툴 설정 (정적 분석 및 보안)
-tools:
- gitleaks:
- enabled: true
- osv-scanner:
- enabled: true
- # ... 이하 생략🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
In @.coderabbit.yaml around lines 104 - 131, The `tools` section is at root
level but must be nested under the `reviews` key per schema; move the entire
`tools:` block so it is a child of `reviews:` (adjust indentation accordingly),
ensuring YAML remains valid (preserve all tool entries like gitleaks,
osv-scanner, pmd, hadolint, checkov, markdownlint, actionlint, yamllint,
github-checks) and update any CI/validation configs if they reference the
previous path.
| osv-scanner: # 의존성 취약점 스캔 | ||
| enabled: true |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
잘못된 속성 이름: osv-scanner
스키마에 따르면 OSV Scanner 도구의 속성 이름은 osv-scanner(kebab-case)가 아닌 osvScanner(camelCase)입니다. 현재 이름으로는 설정이 인식되지 않습니다.
🔧 수정 제안
- osv-scanner: # 의존성 취약점 스캔
- enabled: true
+ osvScanner: # 의존성 취약점 스캔
+ enabled: true📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| osv-scanner: # 의존성 취약점 스캔 | |
| enabled: true | |
| osvScanner: # 의존성 취약점 스캔 | |
| enabled: true |
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
In @.coderabbit.yaml around lines 108 - 109, Replace the incorrect kebab-case
key `osv-scanner` with the schema-expected camelCase `osvScanner` so the tool
setting is recognized (preserve the nested `enabled: true` value); update any
occurrences of `osv-scanner` in this file to `osvScanner` including the
top-level mapping used to configure the OSV Scanner.
|
✅ UTG Post-Process Complete No new issues were detected in the generated code and all check runs have completed. The unit test generation process has completed successfully. |
|
Creating a PR to put the unit tests in... The changes have been created in this pull request: View PR |
No description provided.