This repository was archived by the owner on Apr 16, 2022. It is now read-only.
On export, skip encrypted submissions with manifest but no .enc file. Fix #897
Open
anaskhl wants to merge 1 commit intogetodk:v1.11.xfrom
Open
On export, skip encrypted submissions with manifest but no .enc file. Fix #897anaskhl wants to merge 1 commit intogetodk:v1.11.xfrom
anaskhl wants to merge 1 commit intogetodk:v1.11.xfrom
Conversation
…and mark as failed getodk#895
anaskhl
changed the title
anaskhl
changed the title
Author
|
When reading the list of submissions for parsing, A check is done if the form is encrypted, and submission.xml.enc is not available then log that the file is not available and exclude from the submissions. |
Author
|
It looks like the build failed because of java version issue. How can we fix this? |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in.
1 participant
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
…and mark as failed #895
Closes #
What has been done to verify that this works as intended?
Why is this the best possible solution? Were any other approaches considered?
How does this change affect users? Describe intentional changes to behavior and behavior that could have accidentally been affected by code changes. In other words, what are the regression risks?
Does this change require updates to documentation? If so, please file an issue at https://github.com/getodk/docs/issues/new and include the link below.