revert: undo accidental direct commit to main (ci polish)

[cameroncooke]

This reverts ci polish committed directly to main by mistake. The changes are re-applied on feature branch PR #114. Please merge this revert to restore branch policy integrity.

[claude]

Claude finished @cameroncooke's task —— View job

---

Pull Request Review

Todo List:

• Examine git history to understand what was reverted
• Review the revert commit strategy
• Check related PR ci: make MCP registry publish optional; fix video background; pin AXe 1.1.1 #114 for context
• Provide comprehensive review feedback
• Update comment with final review

---

Review Summary

This PR successfully reverts CI changes that were accidentally committed directly to main, restoring proper branch protection policies. The revert is clean and well-executed.

✅ Strengths

1. Clean Revert Strategy

• Uses proper git revert command (commit c30b502) rather than manual file changes
• Maintains complete commit history and traceability
• No risk of introducing errors through manual edits

2. Clear Intent & Documentation

• Descriptive commit message explains the purpose: "revert: undo accidental direct commit to main (ci polish)"
• PR description clearly states the policy violation and references the proper feature branch PR ci: make MCP registry publish optional; fix video background; pin AXe 1.1.1 #114
• Transparent about the mistake and the corrective action

3. Process Integrity

• Correctly restores main branch to its previous state
• Preserves the development workflow by routing changes through proper feature branch
• Shows commitment to branch protection policies

📋 Technical Analysis

What was reverted:

The original commit (3b21c29) added valuable CI improvements:

• Disabled Go cache to eliminate go.sum warnings
• Added retry logic for MCP registry DNS login (5 attempts with exponential backoff)
• Implemented MCP_STATUS tracking (SUCCESS/FAILED/SKIPPED)
• Added comprehensive publish summary reporting
• Enhanced error handling while maintaining best-effort behavior

Current state verification:

• All changes have been cleanly reverted
• .github/workflows/release.yml restored to previous state
• No orphaned code or partial reverts
• Git history remains clean and linear

🔍 Code Quality Assessment

Revert Quality: Excellent

• Completeness: ✅ Full revert, no partial changes
• Safety: ✅ No manual edits that could introduce bugs
• Traceability: ✅ Clear commit history with proper references
• Atomicity: ✅ Single logical operation across two related commits

No Security Concerns

• Revert operation poses no security risks
• No sensitive data exposure or credential changes
• Restores known-good configuration

No Performance Impact

• Revert removes recent optimizations but returns to stable baseline
• Original performance characteristics restored
• No degradation beyond pre-polish state

📝 Process Recommendations

For Future Prevention:

1. Pre-commit Hooks: Consider adding hooks to prevent direct main commits
2. Branch Protection: Strengthen GitHub branch protection rules if not already maximum
3. CI Validation: Ensure CI checks catch direct main commits

For Feature Branch PR #114:

• The reverted changes appear valuable and should proceed through proper review
• Consider testing the retry logic and status tracking independently
• Verify the go.sum warning fix doesn't break anything else

🎯 Approval Recommendation

✅ RECOMMENDED FOR MERGE

This PR:

• Cleanly resolves the branch policy violation
• Uses best practices for reverting changes
• Maintains code integrity and development workflow
• Includes clear documentation of the corrective action

The revert is technically sound, procedurally correct, and ready for immediate merge to restore branch policy compliance.

---

[pkg-pr-new]

Open in StackBlitz

npm i https://pkg.pr.new/cameroncooke/XcodeBuildMCP/xcodebuildmcp@115

commit: 04e9b26