Improve tool discovery prompt and migrate to simulator-management workflow #88
Conversation
|
Caution Review failedThe pull request is closed. WalkthroughThe changes reorganize and expand the iOS simulator tools, moving from a "Simulator Environment Configuration" workflow to a broader "Simulator Management" workflow. New tools for booting, listing, and opening simulators are added. Documentation and workflow metadata are updated, corresponding tests are migrated, import paths are adjusted for consistency, and the old environment workflow and tests are removed. Changes
Sequence Diagram(s)sequenceDiagram
participant User
participant CLI/Docs
participant Simulator Management Workflow
participant Simulator Tools
User->>CLI/Docs: Consults tools and workflows documentation
CLI/Docs->>User: Presents "Simulator Management" options
User->>Simulator Management Workflow: Selects a simulator tool (e.g., boot_sim, list_sims)
Simulator Management Workflow->>Simulator Tools: Invokes selected tool (via proxy module)
Simulator Tools-->>Simulator Management Workflow: Executes operation (boot, list, open, etc.)
Simulator Management Workflow-->>User: Returns result/status
Estimated code review effort🎯 3 (Moderate) | ⏱️ ~18 minutes Possibly related PRs
Poem
Note 🔌 MCP (Model Context Protocol) integration is now available in Early Access!Pro users can now connect to remote MCP servers under the Integrations page to get reviews and chat conversations that understand additional development context. 📜 Recent review detailsConfiguration used: CodeRabbit UI 📒 Files selected for processing (1)
✨ Finishing Touches
🧪 Generate unit tests
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
SupportNeed help? Create a ticket on our support page for assistance with any issues or questions. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
|
Claude finished @cameroncooke's task —— View job PR Review: Improve tool discovery prompt and migrate to simulator-management workflowReview Checklist
✅ Overall AssessmentThis is a well-executed PR that improves the AI-driven tool discovery system and completes a clean workflow migration. The changes demonstrate strong attention to code quality, testing, and documentation consistency. 🌟 Strengths1. Excellent Tool Discovery Improvements
2. Clean Workflow Migration
3. Strong Test Coverage
4. Documentation Accuracy
🔍 Detailed Code Quality AnalysisSecurity Considerations
Error Handling
Code Structure
🐛 Issues Found1. Test Description Inconsistency (Minor)File: describe('simulator-environment workflow metadata', () => {Issue: Test description still references "simulator-environment" instead of "simulator-management" 2. Import Path Extension Consistency (Minor)File: export { default } from '../simulator-shared/boot_sim.ts';Issue: Using 🚀 Performance Considerations
📋 Test Coverage Assessment
💡 Recommendations1. Fix Test Description (Should Fix)Update the test description in - describe('simulator-environment workflow metadata', () => {
+ describe('simulator-management workflow metadata', () => {2. Consider Import Path Consistency (Optional)Consider standardizing import extensions across re-export files to match the project's runtime requirements. 3. Monitor LLM Selection Accuracy (Future)Consider tracking metrics on how often the improved prompt leads to correct workflow selection to validate the improvements. 🎯 ConclusionThis is a high-quality PR that successfully:
The changes are well-thought-out, properly implemented, and ready for merge after addressing the minor test description issue. Recommendation: Approve with the suggested minor fix |
|
cursor review |
![cursor[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/1210556?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
This comment was marked as outdated.
This comment was marked as outdated.
Sorry, something went wrong.
|
Claude finished @cameroncooke's task —— View job PR Review: Improve tool discovery prompt and migrate to simulator-management workflowReview Checklist
✅ Overall AssessmentThis is a well-executed PR that improves the AI-driven tool discovery system and completes a clean workflow migration. The changes demonstrate strong attention to code quality, testing, and documentation consistency. 🌟 Strengths1. Excellent Tool Discovery Improvements
2. Clean Workflow Migration
3. Strong Test Coverage
4. Documentation Accuracy
🔍 Detailed Code Quality AnalysisSecurity Considerations
Error Handling
Code Structure
🐛 Issues Found1. Test Description Inconsistency (Minor)File: describe('simulator-environment workflow metadata', () => {Issue: Test description still references "simulator-environment" instead of "simulator-management" 2. Import Path Extension Consistency (Minor)File: export { default } from '../simulator-shared/boot_sim.ts';Issue: Using 🚀 Performance Considerations
📋 Test Coverage Assessment
💡 Recommendations1. Fix Test Description (Should Fix)Update the test description in - describe('simulator-environment workflow metadata', () => {
+ describe('simulator-management workflow metadata', () => {2. Consider Import Path Consistency (Optional)Consider standardizing import extensions across re-export files to match the project's runtime requirements. 3. Monitor LLM Selection Accuracy (Future)Consider tracking metrics on how often the improved prompt leads to correct workflow selection to validate the improvements. 🎯 ConclusionThis is a high-quality PR that successfully:
The changes are well-thought-out, properly implemented, and ready for merge after addressing the minor test description issue. Recommendation: Approve with the suggested minor fix |
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 2
🔭 Outside diff range comments (1)
src/mcp/tools/simulator-management/set_simulator_location.ts (1)
18-28: Helper signature deviates from the other toolsHere
executorcomes beforeextraValidation, whereas inreset_simulator_location.tsandset_sim_appearance.tsit is the opposite.
The inconsistency forces call-sites to remember three different orders for the same helper pattern and is an unnecessary foot-gun.Refactor all helpers to share the same parameter order:
paramssimctlSubCommandoperationDescriptionsuccessMessagefailureMessagePrefixoperationLogContextexecutorextraValidation?
♻️ Duplicate comments (5)
src/mcp/tools/simulator-management/sim_statusbar.ts (1)
2-4: Runtime resolution risk – see comment inset_simulator_location.tsThe same
.tsextension change applies here. Confirm that the bundler rewrites the path or revert to.jsto avoid “MODULE_NOT_FOUND”.src/mcp/tools/simulator-management/reset_simulator_location.ts (2)
2-5:.tsextension change – same concern as previous filesRe-evaluate the import-path extension; the risk and recommendation mirror the first comment.
18-27: Parameter order inconsistency with sibling toolsThis helper places
extraValidationafterexecutor, opposite toset_simulator_location.ts.
Unify for predictability (see earlier refactor suggestion).src/mcp/tools/simulator-management/set_sim_appearance.ts (2)
2-4:.tsextension change – same concern as previous filesEnsure the bundler rewrites or revert to
.jsto avoid runtime resolution errors.
18-27: Helper signature diverges againHere
extraValidationprecedesexecutorandexecutorhas a default value, adding yet another variant.
Consolidate signatures across the three helpers.
🧹 Nitpick comments (5)
src/mcp/tools/simulator-management/set_simulator_location.ts (1)
36-68: DuplicatedexecuteSimctlCommandAndRespondhelperNearly identical helpers now live in three files (
set_simulator_location,reset_simulator_location,set_sim_appearance).
Extract once intosrc/mcp/tools/simulator-shared/executeSimctl.tsand import it, to reduce maintenance cost and ensure consistent behaviour.src/mcp/tools/simulator-management/sim_statusbar.ts (1)
63-71: Return shape differs between success and failure
isErroris only set on the failure path. Down-stream consumers that rely on this flag must check for both!result.isErrorandresult.success === undefined.Consider always including a boolean success flag, or always setting
isError.src/mcp/tools/simulator-management/boot_sim.ts (1)
1-2: Comment wording mismatch – update for clarityThe code re-exports from
simulator-shared, but the header comment still references “simulator-workspace”. Rename the comment to avoid future confusion.-// Re-export from simulator-workspace to avoid duplication +// Re-export from simulator-shared to avoid duplicationsrc/mcp/tools/simulator-management/__tests__/index.test.ts (2)
1-3: Fix comment to reflect correct workflow name.The comment references "simulator-environment" but should reference "simulator-management" to match the actual workflow being tested.
/** - * Tests for simulator-environment workflow metadata + * Tests for simulator-management workflow metadata */
7-7: Fix describe block name to match workflow.The describe block still references "simulator-environment" but should reference "simulator-management" to accurately describe what's being tested.
-describe('simulator-environment workflow metadata', () => { +describe('simulator-management workflow metadata', () => {
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (17)
docs/TOOLS.md(1 hunks)scripts/tools-cli.js(18 hunks)src/mcp/tools/discovery/discover_tools.ts(3 hunks)src/mcp/tools/simulator-environment/__tests__/index.test.ts(0 hunks)src/mcp/tools/simulator-environment/index.ts(0 hunks)src/mcp/tools/simulator-management/__tests__/index.test.ts(1 hunks)src/mcp/tools/simulator-management/__tests__/reset_simulator_location.test.ts(1 hunks)src/mcp/tools/simulator-management/__tests__/set_sim_appearance.test.ts(1 hunks)src/mcp/tools/simulator-management/__tests__/sim_statusbar.test.ts(1 hunks)src/mcp/tools/simulator-management/boot_sim.ts(1 hunks)src/mcp/tools/simulator-management/index.ts(1 hunks)src/mcp/tools/simulator-management/list_sims.ts(1 hunks)src/mcp/tools/simulator-management/open_sim.ts(1 hunks)src/mcp/tools/simulator-management/reset_simulator_location.ts(1 hunks)src/mcp/tools/simulator-management/set_sim_appearance.ts(1 hunks)src/mcp/tools/simulator-management/set_simulator_location.ts(1 hunks)src/mcp/tools/simulator-management/sim_statusbar.ts(1 hunks)
💤 Files with no reviewable changes (2)
- src/mcp/tools/simulator-environment/index.ts
- src/mcp/tools/simulator-environment/tests/index.test.ts
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Path-based instructions (2)
**/*.{ts,tsx}
📄 CodeRabbit Inference Engine (CLAUDE.md)
All external interactions (like running commands or accessing the file system) must be handled through injectable executors (
CommandExecutor,FileSystemExecutor).
Files:
src/mcp/tools/simulator-management/reset_simulator_location.tssrc/mcp/tools/simulator-management/__tests__/reset_simulator_location.test.tssrc/mcp/tools/simulator-management/sim_statusbar.tssrc/mcp/tools/simulator-management/set_simulator_location.tssrc/mcp/tools/simulator-management/__tests__/sim_statusbar.test.tssrc/mcp/tools/simulator-management/list_sims.tssrc/mcp/tools/simulator-management/__tests__/set_sim_appearance.test.tssrc/mcp/tools/simulator-management/set_sim_appearance.tssrc/mcp/tools/simulator-management/open_sim.tssrc/mcp/tools/simulator-management/index.tssrc/mcp/tools/simulator-management/boot_sim.tssrc/mcp/tools/simulator-management/__tests__/index.test.tssrc/mcp/tools/discovery/discover_tools.ts
**/*.test.{ts,tsx,js,jsx}
📄 CodeRabbit Inference Engine (CLAUDE.md)
**/*.test.{ts,tsx,js,jsx}: Do not usevi.mock(),vi.fn(),vi.spyOn(), etc. in tests; Vitest mocking is completely banned.
Tests should import the core...Logicfunction from a tool file and pass in a mock executor (createMockExecutororcreateMockFileSystemExecutor) to simulate different outcomes.
Files:
src/mcp/tools/simulator-management/__tests__/reset_simulator_location.test.tssrc/mcp/tools/simulator-management/__tests__/sim_statusbar.test.tssrc/mcp/tools/simulator-management/__tests__/set_sim_appearance.test.tssrc/mcp/tools/simulator-management/__tests__/index.test.ts
🧠 Learnings (3)
📚 Learning: 2025-08-06T11:44:09.150Z
Learnt from: CR
PR: cameroncooke/XcodeBuildMCP#0
File: CLAUDE.md:0-0
Timestamp: 2025-08-06T11:44:09.150Z
Learning: Applies to **/*.test.{ts,tsx,js,jsx} : Tests should import the core `...Logic` function from a tool file and pass in a mock executor (`createMockExecutor` or `createMockFileSystemExecutor`) to simulate different outcomes.
Applied to files:
src/mcp/tools/simulator-management/reset_simulator_location.tssrc/mcp/tools/simulator-management/__tests__/reset_simulator_location.test.tssrc/mcp/tools/simulator-management/sim_statusbar.tssrc/mcp/tools/simulator-management/set_simulator_location.tssrc/mcp/tools/simulator-management/__tests__/sim_statusbar.test.tssrc/mcp/tools/simulator-management/__tests__/set_sim_appearance.test.tssrc/mcp/tools/simulator-management/set_sim_appearance.tssrc/mcp/tools/simulator-management/__tests__/index.test.ts
📚 Learning: 2025-08-06T11:44:09.150Z
Learnt from: CR
PR: cameroncooke/XcodeBuildMCP#0
File: CLAUDE.md:0-0
Timestamp: 2025-08-06T11:44:09.150Z
Learning: Applies to **/*.test.{ts,tsx,js,jsx} : Do not use `vi.mock()`, `vi.fn()`, `vi.spyOn()`, etc. in tests; Vitest mocking is completely banned.
Applied to files:
src/mcp/tools/simulator-management/__tests__/reset_simulator_location.test.tssrc/mcp/tools/simulator-management/__tests__/sim_statusbar.test.tssrc/mcp/tools/simulator-management/__tests__/set_sim_appearance.test.tssrc/mcp/tools/simulator-management/__tests__/index.test.ts
📚 Learning: 2025-08-06T11:44:09.150Z
Learnt from: CR
PR: cameroncooke/XcodeBuildMCP#0
File: CLAUDE.md:0-0
Timestamp: 2025-08-06T11:44:09.150Z
Learning: Applies to **/*.{ts,tsx} : All external interactions (like running commands or accessing the file system) must be handled through injectable executors (`CommandExecutor`, `FileSystemExecutor`).
Applied to files:
src/mcp/tools/simulator-management/__tests__/reset_simulator_location.test.tssrc/mcp/tools/simulator-management/sim_statusbar.tssrc/mcp/tools/simulator-management/set_simulator_location.tssrc/mcp/tools/simulator-management/__tests__/sim_statusbar.test.tssrc/mcp/tools/simulator-management/__tests__/set_sim_appearance.test.tssrc/mcp/tools/simulator-management/set_sim_appearance.ts
🧬 Code Graph Analysis (1)
src/mcp/tools/simulator-management/__tests__/index.test.ts (1)
src/mcp/tools/simulator-management/index.ts (1)
workflow(8-16)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms. You can increase the timeout in your CodeRabbit configuration to a maximum of 15 minutes (900000ms). (1)
- GitHub Check: claude-review
🔇 Additional comments (12)
scripts/tools-cli.js (2)
212-214: Use a cross-platform temp path and avoid unescaped shell interpolationHard-coding
/tmp/...limits the CLI to Unix-like hosts and string-concatenatingreloaderooArgs.join(' ')intobash -copens a door for argument-injection if this helper is ever reused with dynamic input.-import fs from 'fs'; +import fs from 'fs'; +import os from 'os'; // ✅ portable temp directory ... -const tempFile = `/tmp/reloaderoo-output-${Date.now()}.json`; -const command = `npx -y reloaderoo@latest inspect ${reloaderooArgs.join(' ')} -- node "${buildPath}"`; +const tempFile = path.join(os.tmpdir(), `reloaderoo-output-${Date.now()}.json`); + +// Spawn without shell-parsing to remove injection surface +const commandArgs = ['-y', 'reloaderoo@latest', 'inspect', ...reloaderooArgs, '--', 'node', buildPath]; +const child = spawn('npx', commandArgs, { stdio: 'inherit' });Benefits
• Works on Windows and any custom$TMPDIR.
• Eliminates need for a shell, so spaces/quotes in arguments are handled safely.
[ suggest_essential_refactor ]
214-214: Confirmnpx -ysupport in all target environmentsThe
-y/--yesswitch requires npm ≥ 7.0 (Node 14 LTS shipped with npm 6). If CI or user machines run an older npm, the CLI will exit with “unknown option” errors.Please verify the minimal Node/npm versions in
.nvmrc,package.json engines, and CI images, or gracefully fall back when the flag is unsupported.src/mcp/tools/simulator-management/__tests__/set_sim_appearance.test.ts (1)
4-4: Unused import removed – good cleanupRemoving
createMockFileSystemExecutoreliminates dead code and keeps the test import list lean. The file now complies with the CLAUDE.md testing rules while retaining only the requiredcreateMockExecutor.src/mcp/tools/simulator-management/__tests__/sim_statusbar.test.ts (1)
9-9: Consolidated import is correct and type-safeMerging the imports and explicitly pulling in
CommandExecutorstrengthens type safety without introducing Vitest mocks, keeping the test compliant with project guidelines.src/mcp/tools/simulator-management/open_sim.ts (1)
1-2: LGTM – simple proxy moduleStraightforward re-export keeps the workflow structure DRY and centralised.
src/mcp/tools/simulator-management/list_sims.ts (1)
1-2: LGTM – simple proxy moduleConsistent with other proxy exports; no issues spotted.
src/mcp/tools/simulator-management/index.ts (1)
8-16: LGTM! Well-structured workflow definition.The workflow metadata is comprehensive and correctly structured. The capabilities list accurately reflects the expanded simulator management toolset, and the description clearly communicates the workflow's purpose.
docs/TOOLS.md (1)
164-172: LGTM! Documentation correctly reflects the workflow expansion.The updated section title "Simulator Management" and the expanded tool list (7 tools) accurately represent the new workflow capabilities. The addition of
boot_sim,list_sims,open_sim, andsim_statusbartools aligns well with the workflow definition.src/mcp/tools/simulator-management/__tests__/index.test.ts (1)
9-51: LGTM! Comprehensive test coverage.The test suite thoroughly validates all required workflow metadata properties and their expected values. The tests correctly verify the workflow structure and align with the workflow definition in the index file.
src/mcp/tools/discovery/discover_tools.ts (3)
86-87: LGTM! Updated example and clear instructions.The updated example using "iPhone 16 simulator" and the explicit instruction to specify .xcworkspace vs .xcodeproj will help users provide more precise task descriptions for better workflow selection.
161-182: Excellent workflow categorization improvement.The restructured selection guide with Primary (project/workspace-based) and Secondary (task-based) workflows provides much clearer guidance. The explicit categorization of "simulator-management" as a secondary workflow aligns perfectly with the new workflow structure and should significantly reduce misclassification.
372-372: LGTM! Updated tool description reflects new prioritization.The revised description clearly communicates the prioritization of project/workspace workflows while explicitly supporting task-based workflows and Swift packages, which aligns with the restructured prompt logic.
| reset_simulator_locationLogic, | ||
| } from '../reset_simulator_location.ts'; | ||
| import { createMockExecutor, createMockFileSystemExecutor } from '../../../../utils/command.js'; | ||
| import { createMockExecutor } from '../../../../utils/command.js'; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Import path now out of sync with implementation
Tests still point to utils/command.js while the implementation shifted to .ts.
This will break TS-node test runs because command.js does not exist in the source tree.
-import { createMockExecutor } from '../../../../utils/command.js';
+import { createMockExecutor } from '../../../../utils/command.ts';📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| import { createMockExecutor } from '../../../../utils/command.js'; | |
| -import { createMockExecutor } from '../../../../utils/command.js'; | |
| +import { createMockExecutor } from '../../../../utils/command.ts'; |
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
In src/mcp/tools/simulator-management/__tests__/reset_simulator_location.test.ts
at line 6, update the import path from '../../../../utils/command.js' to
'../../../../utils/command.ts' to match the current implementation file
extension and ensure compatibility with TS-node test runs.
| import { ToolResponse } from '../../../types/common.ts'; | ||
| import { log, CommandExecutor, getDefaultCommandExecutor } from '../../../utils/index.ts'; | ||
| import { createTypedTool } from '../../../utils/typed-tool-factory.ts'; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Verification agent
🧩 Analysis chain
.ts import extension may break the emitted ESM bundle
The project previously imported internal modules with the .js extension so that, after compilation, Node/ESM could resolve the transpiled files.
Switching to .ts will cause the compiled .js output to keep the .ts suffix in the import statement, which Node cannot resolve at runtime unless the bundler rewrites paths (tsup does not do this by default).
Please verify the bundle or revert to .js:
-import { ToolResponse } from '../../../types/common.ts';
-import { log, CommandExecutor, getDefaultCommandExecutor } from '../../../utils/index.ts';
-import { createTypedTool } from '../../../utils/typed-tool-factory.ts';
+import { ToolResponse } from '../../../types/common.js';
+import { log, CommandExecutor, getDefaultCommandExecutor } from '../../../utils/index.js';
+import { createTypedTool } from '../../../utils/typed-tool-factory.js';🏁 Script executed:
#!/bin/bash
set -e
# Locate tsup configuration
FILE=$(fd tsup.config.ts || true)
if [[ -n "$FILE" ]]; then
echo "Found tsup config at: $FILE"
echo "----- tsup.config.ts (first 200 lines) -----"
sed -n '1,200p' "$FILE"
echo "-------------------------------------------"
else
echo "No tsup.config.ts found"
fi
echo
echo "Searching for tsup usage in package.json"
rg -n '"tsup"' package.json || echo "No tsup reference in package.json"Length of output: 1480
Fix .ts imports to .js for ESM output
Tsup emits ESM modules without rewriting .ts extensions, so Node won’t resolve imports like …/common.ts at runtime. Update your local imports to use .js:
• File: src/mcp/tools/simulator-management/set_simulator_location.ts (lines 2–4)
-import { ToolResponse } from '../../../types/common.ts';
-import { log, CommandExecutor, getDefaultCommandExecutor } from '../../../utils/index.ts';
-import { createTypedTool } from '../../../utils/typed-tool-factory.ts';
+import { ToolResponse } from '../../../types/common.js';
+import { log, CommandExecutor, getDefaultCommandExecutor } from '../../../utils/index.js';
+import { createTypedTool } from '../../../utils/typed-tool-factory.js';📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| import { ToolResponse } from '../../../types/common.ts'; | |
| import { log, CommandExecutor, getDefaultCommandExecutor } from '../../../utils/index.ts'; | |
| import { createTypedTool } from '../../../utils/typed-tool-factory.ts'; | |
| import { ToolResponse } from '../../../types/common.js'; | |
| import { log, CommandExecutor, getDefaultCommandExecutor } from '../../../utils/index.js'; | |
| import { createTypedTool } from '../../../utils/typed-tool-factory.js'; |
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
In src/mcp/tools/simulator-management/set_simulator_location.ts at lines 2 to 4,
the import statements use `.ts` extensions which are not resolved by Node in ESM
output. Change all import paths from `.ts` to `.js` extensions to ensure proper
module resolution at runtime.
|
Claude finished @cameroncooke's task —— View job PR Review: Improve tool discovery prompt and migrate to simulator-management workflowReview Checklist
✅ Overall AssessmentThis is a well-executed PR that improves the AI-driven tool discovery system and completes a clean workflow migration. The changes demonstrate strong attention to code quality, testing, and documentation consistency. 🌟 Strengths1. Excellent Tool Discovery Improvements
2. Clean Workflow Migration
3. Strong Test Coverage
4. Documentation Accuracy
🔍 Detailed Code Quality AnalysisSecurity Considerations
Error Handling
Code Structure
🐛 Issues Found1. Test Description Inconsistency (Minor)File: describe('simulator-environment workflow metadata', () => {Issue: Test description still references "simulator-environment" instead of "simulator-management" 2. Import Path Extension Consistency (Minor)File: export { default } from '../simulator-shared/boot_sim.ts';Issue: Using 🚀 Performance Considerations
📋 Test Coverage Assessment
💡 Recommendations1. Fix Test Description (Should Fix)Update the test description in - describe('simulator-environment workflow metadata', () => {
+ describe('simulator-management workflow metadata', () => {2. Consider Import Path Consistency (Optional)Consider standardizing import extensions across re-export files to match the project's runtime requirements. 3. Monitor LLM Selection Accuracy (Future)Consider tracking metrics on how often the improved prompt leads to correct workflow selection to validate the improvements. 🎯 ConclusionThis is a high-quality PR that successfully:
The changes are well-thought-out, properly implemented, and ready for merge after addressing the minor test description issue. Recommendation: Approve with the suggested minor fix |
1 participant
Summary
Details
Build/Tests
Addresses: #87
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Bug Fixes
Documentation
Tests
Chores