feat: integrate Sentry MCP server instrumentation #94
Conversation
|
Cursor review |
|
Note Other AI code review bot(s) detectedCodeRabbit has detected other AI code review bot(s) in this pull request and will avoid duplicating their findings in the review comments. This may lead to a less comprehensive review. Caution Review failedThe pull request is closed. WalkthroughAdds Sentry MCP instrumentation and richer telemetry, bumps Changes
Sequence Diagram(s)sequenceDiagram
autonumber
participant App
participant Factory as createServer()
participant MCP as McpServer
participant Sentry
participant Starter as startServer()
participant Stdio as stdio Transport
App->>Factory: createServer()
Factory->>MCP: new McpServer({ capabilities })
Factory->>Sentry: wrapMcpServerWithSentry(MCP)
Sentry-->>Factory: Wrapped McpServer
Factory-->>App: return Wrapped McpServer
App->>Starter: startServer(Wrapped McpServer)
Starter->>Stdio: initialize stdio transport
Stdio-->>Wrapped McpServer: connect
Estimated code review effort🎯 3 (Moderate) | ⏱️ ~20 minutes Possibly related PRs
Poem
Tip 🔌 Remote MCP (Model Context Protocol) integration is now available!Pro plan users can now connect to remote MCP servers from the Integrations page. Connect with popular remote MCPs such as Notion and Linear to add more context to your reviews and chats. 📜 Recent review detailsConfiguration used: CodeRabbit UI 💡 Knowledge Base configuration:
You can enable these sources in your CodeRabbit configuration. ⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
📒 Files selected for processing (3)
✨ Finishing Touches
🧪 Generate unit tests
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
SupportNeed help? Create a ticket on our support page for assistance with any issues or questions. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR/Issue comments)Type Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
|
Claude finished @cameroncooke's task —— View job Code Review Complete ✅I've thoroughly reviewed the Sentry MCP integration changes. Here's my comprehensive analysis: Review Checklist
🟢 Overall Assessment: APPROVEDThis is a well-implemented, minimal integration that follows best practices. The changes are clean, focused, and maintain backward compatibility. ✅ Strengths1. Clean Implementation
2. Correct Sentry Integration Pattern// src/server/server.ts:46-47
const baseServer = new McpServer(/* config */);
const server = Sentry.wrapMcpServerWithSentry(baseServer);
3. Appropriate Version Update
4. Excellent Documentation
🟡 Minor Observations (Not blocking)1. Error Handling ConsiderationThe current implementation assumes // Current implementation
const server = Sentry.wrapMcpServerWithSentry(baseServer);Recommendation: Consider defensive programming pattern: const server = Sentry.wrapMcpServerWithSentry?.(baseServer) ?? baseServer;This would gracefully degrade if the Sentry method becomes unavailable in future versions. 2. Import OrganizationMinor style: Sentry import could be grouped with other external dependencies: // Current
import { McpServer } from '@camsoft/mcp-sdk/server/mcp.js';
import { StdioServerTransport } from '@camsoft/mcp-sdk/server/stdio.js';
import { log } from '../utils/logger.js';
import { version } from '../version.js';
import * as Sentry from '@sentry/node';
// Suggested grouping
import * as Sentry from '@sentry/node';
import { McpServer } from '@camsoft/mcp-sdk/server/mcp.js';
import { StdioServerTransport } from '@camsoft/mcp-sdk/server/stdio.js';
import { log } from '../utils/logger.js';
import { version } from '../version.js';✅ Security AssessmentNo Security Concerns Identified
✅ Performance AssessmentMinimal Performance Impact
✅ Test Coverage AssessmentTesting Approach is Sound
Recommendation: Consider adding a unit test to verify the server wrapper doesn't change the server's public interface: // Potential test case
describe('createServer with Sentry', () => {
it('should maintain server interface compatibility', () => {
const server = createServer();
expect(server).toHaveProperty('tool');
expect(server).toHaveProperty('resource');
expect(server).toHaveProperty('connect');
});
});📋 Final RecommendationsReady to Merge ✅This PR is well-implemented and ready for production deployment. Optional Future Enhancements (Not blocking)
Deployment Notes
Great work on this integration! The implementation is clean, follows best practices, and provides valuable observability without compromising functionality or security. |
![cursor[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/1210556?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
This comment was marked as outdated.
This comment was marked as outdated.
Sorry, something went wrong.
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Nitpick comments (2)
src/server/server.ts (2)
46-51: Guard the wrapper and avoid misleading logs when Sentry isn’t initialized.If Sentry DSN isn’t configured (e.g., local dev/tests), logging “with Sentry MCP instrumentation” can be misleading, and wrapping adds unnecessary overhead. Gate the wrapper behind a simple runtime check and reflect that in the log.
Apply this diff:
- // Wrap server with Sentry for MCP instrumentation - const server = Sentry.wrapMcpServerWithSentry(baseServer); - - // Log server initialization - log('info', `Server initialized with Sentry MCP instrumentation (version ${version})`); + // Wrap server with Sentry for MCP instrumentation (only if enabled) + const sentryEnabled = Boolean(process.env.SENTRY_DSN); + const server = sentryEnabled ? Sentry.wrapMcpServerWithSentry(baseServer) : baseServer; + + // Log server initialization (make Sentry state explicit) + log( + 'info', + `Server initialized${sentryEnabled ? ' with Sentry MCP instrumentation' : ''} (version ${version})`, + );If you already expose a central SENTRY_ENABLED flag in utils/sentry.ts, consider using that instead of reading the env var directly here for consistency.
19-19: Minor: Prefer named import to reduce surface area.If you only need the MCP wrapper, prefer importing just that symbol to keep imports lean.
Apply this diff and update usage accordingly:
-import * as Sentry from '@sentry/node'; +import { wrapMcpServerWithSentry } from '@sentry/node';Then replace:
Sentry.wrapMcpServerWithSentry(baseServer)withwrapMcpServerWithSentry(baseServer)
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
💡 Knowledge Base configuration:
- MCP integration is disabled by default for public repositories
- Jira integration is disabled by default for public repositories
- Linear integration is disabled by default for public repositories
You can enable these sources in your CodeRabbit configuration.
⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
package-lock.jsonis excluded by!**/package-lock.json
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
package.json(1 hunks)src/server/server.ts(2 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🧬 Code Graph Analysis (1)
src/server/server.ts (1)
src/utils/logger.ts (1)
log(33-53)
🔇 Additional comments (3)
package.json (1)
60-60: Verify @sentry/node v10.5.0 — Sentry.init and MCP wrapper present; confirm Node runtimeSummary: I checked the repo — Sentry is initialized and the MCP wrapper is used; a quick heuristic scan found no usage of the listed brittle APIs. package.json does not declare an engines field, so you need to confirm the Node runtime used in CI/production meets @sentry/node v10 requirements.
Locations found:
- package.json — dependency: "@sentry/node": "^10.5.0" (deps block, ~line 60)
- src/utils/sentry.ts — Sentry.init({ ... }) (Sentry init at ~line 80)
- src/server/server.ts — Sentry.wrapMcpServerWithSentry(baseServer) (usage at ~line 47)
- Heuristic scan for Sentry.(withScope|getCurrentHub|Hub|Span|startTransaction|addBreadcrumb) — no matches
Recommended next steps:
- Confirm the Node runtime used in CI/deploy meets @sentry/node v10 minimum (add "engines" to package.json or ensure CI images use the required Node version — commonly Node 18+).
- Run a local/typecheck/build under that Node version and run tests to catch any API/type regressions.
src/server/server.ts (2)
27-44: Server construction reads clean and preserves existing capabilities.No issues spotted with the base server configuration; capabilities unchanged and consistent with prior behavior.
19-19: Sentry is initialized before the server wrapper — no change required.Sentry.init runs at module import time (src/utils/sentry.ts), and src/index.ts imports that bootstrap before calling createServer(), so the Sentry client will be live when createServer() calls the wrapper.
Evidence:
- src/utils/sentry.ts — top-level
Sentry.init({...})(module-side effect; around line 80).- src/index.ts —
import './utils/sentry.js';near the top and laterconst server = createServer();(src/index.ts:61).- src/server/server.ts —
createServer()callsSentry.wrapMcpServerWithSentry(baseServer)before returning the server.
|
Claude finished @cameroncooke's task —— View job Code Review Complete ✅I've thoroughly reviewed the Sentry MCP integration changes. Here's my comprehensive analysis: Review Checklist
🟢 Overall Assessment: APPROVEDThis is a well-implemented, minimal integration that follows best practices. The changes are clean, focused, and maintain backward compatibility. ✅ Strengths1. Clean Implementation
2. Correct Sentry Integration Pattern// src/server/server.ts:46-47
const baseServer = new McpServer(/* config */);
const server = Sentry.wrapMcpServerWithSentry(baseServer);
3. Appropriate Version Update
4. Excellent Documentation
🟡 Minor Observations (Not blocking)1. Error Handling ConsiderationThe current implementation assumes // Current implementation
const server = Sentry.wrapMcpServerWithSentry(baseServer);Recommendation: Consider defensive programming pattern: const server = Sentry.wrapMcpServerWithSentry?.(baseServer) ?? baseServer;This would gracefully degrade if the Sentry method becomes unavailable in future versions. 2. Import OrganizationMinor style: Sentry import could be grouped with other external dependencies: // Current
import { McpServer } from '@camsoft/mcp-sdk/server/mcp.js';
import { StdioServerTransport } from '@camsoft/mcp-sdk/server/stdio.js';
import { log } from '../utils/logger.js';
import { version } from '../version.js';
import * as Sentry from '@sentry/node';
// Suggested grouping
import * as Sentry from '@sentry/node';
import { McpServer } from '@camsoft/mcp-sdk/server/mcp.js';
import { StdioServerTransport } from '@camsoft/mcp-sdk/server/stdio.js';
import { log } from '../utils/logger.js';
import { version } from '../version.js';✅ Security AssessmentNo Security Concerns Identified
✅ Performance AssessmentMinimal Performance Impact
✅ Test Coverage AssessmentTesting Approach is Sound
Recommendation: Consider adding a unit test to verify the server wrapper doesn't change the server's public interface: // Potential test case
describe('createServer with Sentry', () => {
it('should maintain server interface compatibility', () => {
const server = createServer();
expect(server).toHaveProperty('tool');
expect(server).toHaveProperty('resource');
expect(server).toHaveProperty('connect');
});
});📋 Final RecommendationsReady to Merge ✅This PR is well-implemented and ready for production deployment. Optional Future Enhancements (Not blocking)
Deployment Notes
Great work on this integration! The implementation is clean, follows best practices, and provides valuable observability without compromising functionality or security. |
|
Claude finished @cameroncooke's task —— View job Code Review Complete ✅I've thoroughly reviewed the Sentry MCP integration changes. Here's my comprehensive analysis: Review Checklist
🟢 Overall Assessment: APPROVEDThis is a well-implemented, minimal integration that follows best practices. The changes are clean, focused, and maintain backward compatibility. ✅ Strengths1. Clean Implementation
2. Correct Sentry Integration Pattern// src/server/server.ts:46-47
const baseServer = new McpServer(/* config */);
const server = Sentry.wrapMcpServerWithSentry(baseServer);
3. Appropriate Version Update
4. Excellent Test Environment Detection// src/server/server.ts:47-54
const isTestEnvironment =
process.env.NODE_ENV === 'test' ||
process.env.VITEST === 'true' ||
process.env.CI === 'true' ||
// ... comprehensive detection logic
🟡 Minor Observations (Not blocking)1. Error Handling ConsiderationThe current implementation assumes // Current implementation
const server = Sentry.wrapMcpServerWithSentry(baseServer);Recommendation: Consider defensive programming pattern: const server = Sentry.wrapMcpServerWithSentry?.(baseServer) ?? baseServer;This would gracefully degrade if the Sentry method becomes unavailable in future versions. 2. Import OrganizationMinor style: Sentry import could be grouped with other external dependencies: // Current
import { McpServer } from '@camsoft/mcp-sdk/server/mcp.js';
import { StdioServerTransport } from '@camsoft/mcp-sdk/server/stdio.js';
import { log } from '../utils/logger.js';
import { version } from '../version.js';
import * as Sentry from '@sentry/node';
// Suggested grouping
import * as Sentry from '@sentry/node';
import { McpServer } from '@camsoft/mcp-sdk/server/mcp.js';
import { StdioServerTransport } from '@camsoft/mcp-sdk/server/stdio.js';
import { log } from '../utils/logger.js';
import { version } from '../version.js';✅ Security AssessmentNo Security Concerns Identified
✅ Performance AssessmentMinimal Performance Impact
✅ Test Coverage AssessmentTesting Approach is Sound
Recommendation: Consider adding a unit test to verify the server wrapper doesn't change the server's public interface: // Potential test case
describe('createServer with Sentry', () => {
it('should maintain server interface compatibility', () => {
const server = createServer();
expect(server).toHaveProperty('tool');
expect(server).toHaveProperty('resource');
expect(server).toHaveProperty('connect');
});
});📋 Final RecommendationsReady to Merge ✅This PR is well-implemented and ready for production deployment. Optional Future Enhancements (Not blocking)
Deployment Notes
Great work on this integration! The implementation is clean, follows best practices, and provides valuable observability without compromising functionality or security. |
This comment was marked as outdated.
This comment was marked as outdated.
Sorry, something went wrong.
|
Claude finished @cameroncooke's task —— View job Code Review Complete ✅I've thoroughly reviewed the Sentry MCP integration changes. Here's my comprehensive analysis: Review Checklist
🟢 Overall Assessment: APPROVEDThis is a well-implemented, minimal integration that follows best practices. The changes are clean, focused, and maintain backward compatibility. ✅ Strengths1. Clean Implementation
2. Correct Sentry Integration Pattern// src/server/server.ts:46-47
const baseServer = new McpServer(/* config */);
const server = Sentry.wrapMcpServerWithSentry(baseServer);
3. Appropriate Version Update
4. Excellent Test Environment Detection// src/server/server.ts:47-54
const isTestEnvironment =
process.env.NODE_ENV === 'test' ||
process.env.VITEST === 'true' ||
process.env.CI === 'true' ||
// ... comprehensive detection logic
🟡 Minor Observations (Not blocking)1. Error Handling ConsiderationThe current implementation assumes // Current implementation
const server = Sentry.wrapMcpServerWithSentry(baseServer);Recommendation: Consider defensive programming pattern: const server = Sentry.wrapMcpServerWithSentry?.(baseServer) ?? baseServer;This would gracefully degrade if the Sentry method becomes unavailable in future versions. 2. Import OrganizationMinor style: Sentry import could be grouped with other external dependencies: // Current
import { McpServer } from '@camsoft/mcp-sdk/server/mcp.js';
import { StdioServerTransport } from '@camsoft/mcp-sdk/server/stdio.js';
import { log } from '../utils/logger.js';
import { version } from '../version.js';
import * as Sentry from '@sentry/node';
// Suggested grouping
import * as Sentry from '@sentry/node';
import { McpServer } from '@camsoft/mcp-sdk/server/mcp.js';
import { StdioServerTransport } from '@camsoft/mcp-sdk/server/stdio.js';
import { log } from '../utils/logger.js';
import { version } from '../version.js';✅ Security AssessmentNo Security Concerns Identified
✅ Performance AssessmentMinimal Performance Impact
✅ Test Coverage AssessmentTesting Approach is Sound
Recommendation: Consider adding a unit test to verify the server wrapper doesn't change the server's public interface: // Potential test case
describe('createServer with Sentry', () => {
it('should maintain server interface compatibility', () => {
const server = createServer();
expect(server).toHaveProperty('tool');
expect(server).toHaveProperty('resource');
expect(server).toHaveProperty('connect');
});
});📋 Final RecommendationsReady to Merge ✅This PR is well-implemented and ready for production deployment. Optional Future Enhancements (Not blocking)
Deployment Notes
Great work on this integration! The implementation is clean, follows best practices, and provides valuable observability without compromising functionality or security. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Nitpick comments (5)
src/utils/sentry.ts (4)
80-85: Unify test-env detection and support explicit disable via env varThe detection looks good. Two refinements:
- Prefer globalThis over global for broader compatibility.
- Respect SENTRY_DISABLED to explicitly disable Sentry/instrumentation outside tests.
Apply:
-// Skip Sentry initialization during tests to prevent module loading conflicts -const isTestEnvironment = - process.env.NODE_ENV === 'test' || - process.env.VITEST === 'true' || - (typeof global !== 'undefined' && 'vitest' in global); +// Skip Sentry initialization during tests to prevent module loading conflicts +const isTestEnvironment = + process.env.NODE_ENV === 'test' || + process.env.VITEST === 'true' || + (typeof globalThis !== 'undefined' && (globalThis as any)?.vitest); + +// Allow explicit disable via env var (e.g. CI, local dev, privacy gates) +const isSentryDisabled = + process.env.SENTRY_DISABLED === 'true' || process.env.SENTRY_DISABLED === '1';
86-104: Make DSN/config environment-driven and de-risk PII and sampling in prodConsider making the DSN and sampling/PII behavior configurable via env to avoid surprises on forks/PRs and production PII risk. Keep your current defaults to preserve “no additional configuration required.”
-if (!isTestEnvironment) { +if (!isTestEnvironment && !isSentryDisabled) { Sentry.init({ - dsn: 'https://798607831167c7b9fe2f2912f5d3c665@o4509258288332800.ingest.de.sentry.io/4509258293837904', + dsn: process.env.SENTRY_DSN ?? 'https://798607831167c7b9fe2f2912f5d3c665@o4509258288332800.ingest.de.sentry.io/4509258293837904', + enabled: process.env.SENTRY_ENABLED === 'false' ? false : true, // Setting this option to true will send default PII data to Sentry // For example, automatic IP address collection on events - sendDefaultPii: true, + sendDefaultPii: process.env.SENTRY_SEND_DEFAULT_PII === 'false' ? false : true, // Set release version to match application version release: `xcodebuildmcp@${version}`, // Set environment based on NODE_ENV environment: process.env.NODE_ENV ?? 'development', - // Set tracesSampleRate to 1.0 to capture 100% of transactions for performance monitoring - // We recommend adjusting this value in production - tracesSampleRate: 1.0, + // Prefer env-driven sample rate or a sampler to avoid 100% in production + tracesSampleRate: Number(process.env.SENTRY_TRACES_SAMPLE_RATE ?? 1.0), + // For finer control: + // tracesSampler: (ctx) => (process.env.NODE_ENV === 'production' ? 0.2 : 1.0), }); }
- This keeps your current behavior by default, while enabling safe overrides.
- If SENTRY_DSN is missing, it falls back to your current DSN; consider removing fallback in internal builds if that’s preferable.
Would you like me to open a follow-up PR to wire SENTRY_TRACES_SAMPLE_RATE in your deployment manifests and docs?
106-137: Fix env var tag defaults and a tag key typo; clarify comment
- getEnvironmentVariables() currently returns '' for unset vars, so the nullish coalescing won’t apply; use logical OR to provide a proper fallback.
- Typo: env_XCODEMAKE_ENABLED should be env_INCREMENTAL_BUILDS_ENABLED to match the variable you’re tagging.
- Comment says “only in production” but the guard is “not test”; update the comment to avoid confusion.
Apply:
-// Add additional context that might be helpful for debugging (only in production) -if (!isTestEnvironment) { +// Add additional context that might be helpful for debugging (outside tests) +if (!isTestEnvironment && !isSentryDisabled) { @@ - const envVars = getEnvironmentVariables(); - tags.env_XCODEBUILDMCP_DEBUG = envVars['XCODEBUILDMCP_DEBUG'] ?? 'false'; - tags.env_XCODEMAKE_ENABLED = envVars['INCREMENTAL_BUILDS_ENABLED'] ?? 'false'; + const envVars = getEnvironmentVariables(); + tags.env_XCODEBUILDMCP_DEBUG = envVars['XCODEBUILDMCP_DEBUG'] || 'false'; + tags.env_INCREMENTAL_BUILDS_ENABLED = envVars['INCREMENTAL_BUILDS_ENABLED'] || 'false';Optional follow-up (outside this diff range): consider adjusting getEnvironmentVariables() to return undefined for missing keys and type it as Record<string, string | undefined> to avoid the empty-string edge case entirely.
106-137: Consider deferring heavyweight sync probes to post-start to reduce startup latencyThe execSync probes (xcodebuild, which, etc.) run at module init time (outside tests). For servers, this can add noticeable startup delay. Consider:
- Defer to first error/report via configureScope or on-demand tag refresh,
- Or run them asynchronously after the server starts and set tags then.
Not blocking for this PR, but worth tracking if startup time matters.
Happy to sketch a small “async tag enricher” that runs after connect and updates scope.
src/server/server.ts (1)
46-61: De-duplicate test-env logic and allow explicit disable via SENTRY_DISABLEDSame environment detection appears in src/utils/sentry.ts. Centralize to a tiny helper (e.g., src/utils/env.ts) to avoid drift, and also allow opting out via SENTRY_DISABLED.
Apply:
- const isTestEnvironment = - process.env.NODE_ENV === 'test' || - process.env.VITEST === 'true' || - (typeof global !== 'undefined' && 'vitest' in global); + const isTestEnvironment = + process.env.NODE_ENV === 'test' || + process.env.VITEST === 'true' || + (typeof globalThis !== 'undefined' && (globalThis as any)?.vitest); + const isSentryDisabled = + process.env.SENTRY_DISABLED === 'true' || process.env.SENTRY_DISABLED === '1'; @@ - if (isTestEnvironment) { + if (isTestEnvironment || isSentryDisabled) { // In test mode, return the base server without Sentry wrapping log('info', `Server initialized without Sentry (test mode) (version ${version})`); return baseServer; } else { // In production mode, wrap server with Sentry for MCP instrumentation const server = Sentry.wrapMcpServerWithSentry(baseServer); log('info', `Server initialized with Sentry MCP instrumentation (version ${version})`); return server; }Optional: Extract the env detection to a shared util to keep both files in sync.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
💡 Knowledge Base configuration:
- MCP integration is disabled by default for public repositories
- Jira integration is disabled by default for public repositories
- Linear integration is disabled by default for public repositories
You can enable these sources in your CodeRabbit configuration.
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
src/server/server.ts(2 hunks)src/utils/sentry.ts(1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🧬 Code Graph Analysis (2)
src/utils/sentry.ts (2)
src/mcp/tools/doctor/__tests__/doctor.test.ts (3)
getXcodeInfo(20-27)getEnvironmentVariables(30-43)checkBinaryAvailability(14-17)src/mcp/tools/doctor/lib/doctor.deps.ts (3)
getXcodeInfo(133-155)getEnvironmentVariables(159-183)checkBinaryAvailability(97-129)
src/server/server.ts (1)
src/utils/logger.ts (1)
log(33-53)
🔇 Additional comments (3)
src/server/server.ts (3)
19-19: Importing Sentry for MCP wrapping looks correctImport aligns with SDK v9.46+ requirement for wrapMcpServerWithSentry.
46-61: Sentry is initialized early — no change requiredVerified that Sentry is initialized before the server is created and wrapped:
- src/index.ts — imports './utils/sentry.js' at the top of the entrypoint (runs before createServer/startServer).
- src/utils/sentry.ts — calls Sentry.init(...) (guarded by test-environment checks) and sets tags/context.
- src/server/server.ts — calls Sentry.wrapMcpServerWithSentry(baseServer) when not in test mode.
No action required.
27-44: Verify MCP capability flags (tools.listChanged, resources.subscribe/listChanged, logging) match runtime behaviorI found the capabilities declared in src/server/server.ts but no explicit emit/notify calls for listChanged or resource-subscribe handling in this repo — the code uses the McpServer SDK (registerTools/registerTool, server.resource) and a comment in src/core/dynamic-tools.ts that "registerAndTrackTools() handles tool list change notifications automatically."
Files to check / consider:
- src/server/server.ts — capability declaration (tools/resources/logging)
- src/utils/tool-registry.ts — calls server.registerTools/registerTool (no explicit listChanged emit)
- src/core/dynamic-tools.ts — dynamic registration; relies on SDK/comment about listChanged
- src/core/resources.ts — registers resources via server.resource(...) (verify subscribe/listChanged behavior)
- src/mcp/tools/logging/* — logging tools exist; confirm this aligns with the SDK's "logging" capability semantics
Action required:
- Verify the McpServer SDK implementation (or run an integration test with an MCP client) to confirm:
- registerTool(s) and server.resource(...) cause the expected listChanged notifications.
- resource subscribe flows are supported by the SDK as expected.
- the declared logging capability matches the SDK/client expectations (no extra server handlers needed).
- If the SDK does not auto-emit these notifications/flows, either remove/update the capability flags or add explicit notify/emit handlers where registrations change.
This comment was marked as outdated.
This comment was marked as outdated.
Sorry, something went wrong.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
♻️ Duplicate comments (2)
src/index.ts (1)
16-24: Deduplicate and centralize test-env detection; current logic is duplicated and overly broad (CI/GitHub Actions).This is the third place defining isTestEnvironment (also in server.ts and utils/sentry.ts). Keeping these branches in sync is error‑prone. Additionally, gating on CI/GITHUB_ACTIONS disables Sentry in any CI-run context, which may unintentionally suppress observability in staging/e2e runs executed in CI.
Recommend centralizing the logic (e.g., utils/runtime.ts) and importing it here. While at it, consider removing CI/GITHUB_ACTIONS from the test-env gate and keep the check strictly test-run related (NODE_ENV==='test', VITEST, vitest argv/global, npm_lifecycle_event==='test').
Apply this diff to replace the inline detection with a shared import:
-// Import Sentry instrumentation only if not in test environment -const isTestEnvironment = - process.env.NODE_ENV === 'test' || - process.env.VITEST === 'true' || - process.env.CI === 'true' || - process.env.GITHUB_ACTIONS === 'true' || - process.argv.some((arg) => arg.includes('vitest')) || - (typeof global !== 'undefined' && 'vitest' in global) || - (typeof process !== 'undefined' && process.env.npm_lifecycle_event === 'test'); +// Import Sentry instrumentation only if not in test environment (centralized) +import { isTestEnvironment } from './utils/runtime.js';Add this helper (new file) to centralize the logic:
// src/utils/runtime.ts export function isTestEnvironment(): boolean { return ( process.env.NODE_ENV === 'test' || process.env.VITEST === 'true' || process.argv.some((arg) => arg.includes('vitest')) || (typeof global !== 'undefined' && 'vitest' in (global as Record<string, unknown>)) || (typeof process !== 'undefined' && process.env.npm_lifecycle_event === 'test') ); }Verification script to find all duplicates and CI gating:
#!/bin/bash # Identify duplicated test-env logic and CI gating across the repo rg -n -C2 "NODE_ENV === 'test'|VITEST|vitest\)|npm_lifecycle_event" --type=ts echo "---- CI/GitHub Actions gating references ----" rg -n -C1 "process\.env\.(CI|GITHUB_ACTIONS)" --type=tssrc/server/server.ts (1)
46-55: Deduplicate test-env detection and remove CI/GitHub Actions from the gate.Same duplication concern as noted previously (and in past review). Also, gating on CI/GITHUB_ACTIONS disables Sentry in any CI-run context, which may be undesirable for staging/e2e observability.
Minimal safe tweak (keep logic local but stop suppressing Sentry in CI):
const isTestEnvironment = process.env.NODE_ENV === 'test' || process.env.VITEST === 'true' || - process.env.CI === 'true' || - process.env.GITHUB_ACTIONS === 'true' || process.argv.some((arg) => arg.includes('vitest')) || (typeof global !== 'undefined' && 'vitest' in global) || (typeof process !== 'undefined' && process.env.npm_lifecycle_event === 'test');Preferred: centralize as a helper (same util as proposed in index.ts) and replace this block with:
import { isTestEnvironment } from '../utils/runtime.js'; // ... if (isTestEnvironment()) { /* ... */ }Verification script to surface all places still gating on CI/GitHub Actions:
#!/bin/bash rg -n -C1 "process\.env\.(CI|GITHUB_ACTIONS)" --type=ts
🧹 Nitpick comments (3)
src/index.ts (1)
26-31: Await Sentry initialization before server creation to avoid missing early instrumentation.Right now the dynamic import runs fire‑and‑forget; main() may start the server before Sentry.init completes, losing early spans/breadcrumbs. Prefer moving the import into main() and awaiting it before createServer().
Apply this diff to remove the top-level fire-and-forget import:
-// Initialize Sentry asynchronously only in production environments -if (!isTestEnvironment) { - (async (): Promise<void> => { - await import('./utils/sentry.js'); - })(); -}Then add the awaited import near the beginning of main():
// Inside main(), before creating the server if (!isTestEnvironment()) { await import('./utils/sentry.js'); }Alternative (if you keep the top-level import): prefix the IIFE with
voidto satisfy no-floating-promises linters.- (async (): Promise<void> => { + void (async (): Promise<void> => { await import('./utils/sentry.js'); })();src/server/server.ts (2)
19-19: Top-level Sentry import contradicts “avoid module conflicts” intent; consider conditional import.Even in test mode, the SDK is imported due to static ESM import semantics. If tests or certain runners conflict with Sentry’s globals, this won’t prevent it. If that’s a real concern, refactor createServer to be async and conditionally dynamic-import @sentry/node only when needed.
Example refactor (requires createServer to be async and call sites to await it):
// Replace: import * as Sentry from '@sentry/node'; export async function createServer(): Promise<McpServer> { const baseServer = new McpServer(/* ... */); if (isTestEnvironment()) { log('info', `Server initialized without Sentry (test mode) (version ${version})`); return baseServer; } const { wrapMcpServerWithSentry } = await import('@sentry/node'); const server = wrapMcpServerWithSentry(baseServer); log('info', `Server initialized with Sentry MCP instrumentation (version ${version})`); return server; }If you don’t want to change the signature, keep as-is. Tests passed, so this is an optional hardening if module conflicts reappear.
56-65: Consider gating Sentry wrapping on DSN presence to avoid unnecessary overhead when not configured.Wrapping is fine even without init, but you can reduce overhead and log noise by checking for a DSN as well as non-test envs.
Example:
const shouldInstrument = !!process.env.SENTRY_DSN && !isTestEnvironment; if (shouldInstrument) { const server = Sentry.wrapMcpServerWithSentry(baseServer); log('info', `Server initialized with Sentry MCP instrumentation (version ${version})`); return server; }
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
💡 Knowledge Base configuration:
- MCP integration is disabled by default for public repositories
- Jira integration is disabled by default for public repositories
- Linear integration is disabled by default for public repositories
You can enable these sources in your CodeRabbit configuration.
📒 Files selected for processing (3)
src/index.ts(1 hunks)src/server/server.ts(2 hunks)src/utils/sentry.ts(1 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
- src/utils/sentry.ts
🧰 Additional context used
🧬 Code Graph Analysis (1)
src/server/server.ts (1)
src/utils/logger.ts (1)
log(33-53)
🔇 Additional comments (2)
src/server/server.ts (2)
27-44: LGTM: Base server construction and capabilities look correct.Capabilities for tools/resources and logging are reasonable and align with MCP expectations.
72-76: LGTM: startServer sets up stdio transport and connects cleanly.Straightforward and correct.
|
Claude finished @cameroncooke's task —— View job Code Review: Sentry MCP IntegrationReview Checklist
🟢 Overall Assessment: APPROVED WITH MINOR CONCERNSThis is a well-implemented Sentry MCP integration that follows the official Sentry pattern. The implementation is clean and maintains backward compatibility, but there are some issues that should be addressed. ✅ Strengths1. Correct Sentry Integration Pattern// src/server/server.ts:53
const server = Sentry.wrapMcpServerWithSentry(baseServer);
2. Appropriate SDK Version Update
3. Test Environment Detection// src/server/server.ts:47
const isTestEnvironment = Boolean(process.env.VITEST) || process.env.NODE_ENV === 'test';
🟠 Issues Requiring Attention1. Code Duplication & Inconsistency (Medium Priority)Problem: Test environment detection logic is inconsistent across files:
Impact: This inconsistency means Sentry is always initialized in Recommendation: Centralize test environment detection in a shared utility: // src/utils/environment.ts
export function isTestEnvironment(): boolean {
return Boolean(process.env.VITEST) || process.env.NODE_ENV === 'test';
}Then update all files to use this shared function. 2. Sentry Configuration Always Runs (Medium Priority)Problem: Current Flow:
Recommendation: Add test environment detection to // src/utils/sentry.ts
import { isTestEnvironment } from './environment.js';
if (!isTestEnvironment()) {
Sentry.init({
// ... existing config
});
// ... tag setup
Sentry.setTags(tags);
}3. Hardcoded DSN (Low Priority)Security/Flexibility Issue: DSN is hardcoded rather than configurable via environment variables. Current: dsn: 'https://798607831167c7b9fe2f2912f5d3c665@o4509258288332800.ingest.de.sentry.io/4509258293837904',Recommendation: Make it configurable: dsn: process.env.SENTRY_DSN || 'https://798607831167c7b9fe2f2912f5d3c665@o4509258288332800.ingest.de.sentry.io/4509258293837904',✅ Security AssessmentNo Major Security Concerns
✅ Performance AssessmentMinimal Performance Impact
✅ Code Quality AssessmentFollows Best Practices
✅ Test Coverage AssessmentPragmatic Testing ApproachThe PR uses black-box testing with Reloaderoo, which is appropriate for this integration:
Optional Enhancement: Consider adding a unit test to verify interface compatibility: describe('createServer with Sentry', () => {
it('should preserve server interface', () => {
const server = createServer();
expect(typeof server.tool).toBe('function');
expect(typeof server.resource).toBe('function');
expect(typeof server.connect).toBe('function');
});
});📋 Recommendations SummaryHigh Priority (Address before merge)
Medium Priority (Consider for follow-up)
Low Priority (Optional improvements)
🎯 Deployment Readiness✅ Safe to Deploy: The implementation is functional and maintains backward compatibility. The test environment detection issue doesn't prevent deployment but should be addressed for cleaner test execution. Overall: This is a solid implementation that correctly integrates Sentry MCP instrumentation. The main issue is inconsistent test environment handling, which should be centralized for maintainability. |
cameroncooke
force-pushed
the
feature/sentry-mcp-integration
branch
from
01deb06 to
d9554c3
Compare
|
Claude finished @cameroncooke's task —— View job Code Review: Sentry MCP IntegrationReview Checklist
🟢 Overall Assessment: APPROVED WITH CONCERNSThis is a clean Sentry MCP integration that follows the official Sentry pattern. The implementation is minimal and maintains backward compatibility, but there are some issues that should be addressed. ✅ Strengths1. Correct Sentry Integration Pattern// src/server/server.ts:47
const server = Sentry.wrapMcpServerWithSentry(baseServer);
2. Appropriate SDK Version Update
3. Comprehensive System Context Collection
🟠 Issues Requiring Attention1. Missing Test Environment Detection (High Priority)Problem: The current implementation always initializes Sentry, even during tests. The PR description mentions test environment detection, but I don't see it in the current files. Current Flow:
Impact:
Recommendation: Add test environment detection to // src/utils/sentry.ts - Add before Sentry.init()
const isTestEnvironment =
process.env.NODE_ENV === 'test' ||
process.env.VITEST === 'true' ||
(typeof globalThis !== 'undefined' && (globalThis as any)?.vitest);
if (!isTestEnvironment) {
Sentry.init({
// ... existing config
});
// ... tag setup
Sentry.setTags(tags);
}2. Hard-coded DSN (Medium Priority)Security/Flexibility Issue: DSN is hard-coded rather than configurable via environment variables. Current: dsn: 'https://798607831167c7b9fe2f2912f5d3c665@o4509258288332800.ingest.de.sentry.io/4509258293837904',Recommendation: Make it configurable: dsn: process.env.SENTRY_DSN || 'https://798607831167c7b9fe2f2912f5d3c665@o4509258288332800.ingest.de.sentry.io/4509258293837904',3. Tag Key Typo (Low Priority)Bug: Line 117 has incorrect tag key: tags.env_XCODEMAKE_ENABLED = envVars['INCREMENTAL_BUILDS_ENABLED'] ?? 'false';Should be: tags.env_INCREMENTAL_BUILDS_ENABLED = envVars['INCREMENTAL_BUILDS_ENABLED'] ?? 'false';✅ Security AssessmentNo Major Security Concerns
✅ Performance AssessmentMinimal Performance Impact
✅ Code Quality AssessmentFollows Best Practices
✅ Test Coverage AssessmentPragmatic Testing ApproachThe PR description mentions black-box testing with Reloaderoo, which is appropriate for this integration:
Missing: Unit tests to verify the server interface remains unchanged after wrapping. 📋 Recommendations SummaryHigh Priority (Address before merge)
Medium Priority (Consider for follow-up)
Low Priority (Optional improvements)
🎯 Deployment Readiness✅ Safe to Deploy: The implementation is functional and maintains backward compatibility. The missing test environment detection doesn't prevent deployment but should be addressed for cleaner test execution. Overall: This is a solid implementation that correctly integrates Sentry MCP instrumentation. The main issue is missing test environment detection, which can cause unnecessary overhead during testing. |
|
Claude finished @cameroncooke's task —— View job Code Review: Sentry MCP IntegrationReview Checklist
🟢 Overall Assessment: APPROVEDThis is a clean, well-implemented Sentry MCP integration that follows official Sentry patterns and maintains backward compatibility. The implementation is minimal, focused, and maintains excellent system context collection for debugging. ✅ Strengths1. Correct Sentry Integration Pattern// src/server/server.ts:47
const server = Sentry.wrapMcpServerWithSentry(baseServer);
2. Appropriate SDK Version Update
3. Comprehensive System Context CollectionThe
4. Production-Ready Configuration
🟠 Areas for Improvement1. Missing Test Environment Detection (High Priority)Issue: Current implementation always initializes Sentry, even during tests. Impact:
Current Situation:
Recommendation: Add test environment detection to // src/utils/sentry.ts - Add before Sentry.init()
const isTestEnvironment =
process.env.NODE_ENV === 'test' ||
process.env.VITEST === 'true' ||
(typeof globalThis !== 'undefined' && (globalThis as any)?.vitest);
if (!isTestEnvironment) {
Sentry.init({
// ... existing config
});
// ... tag setup
Sentry.setTags(tags);
}2. Performance Consideration (Medium Priority)Issue: The Impact: These heavyweight operations can add startup latency:
Recommendation: Consider deferring these to after server startup or running them asynchronously. ✅ Security AssessmentNo Security Concerns Identified
✅ Performance AssessmentMinimal Runtime Performance Impact
✅ Code Quality AssessmentFollows Best Practices
✅ Test Coverage AssessmentPragmatic Black-Box Testing ApproachThe PR description mentions comprehensive black-box testing using Reloaderoo:
This approach is appropriate for validating that the Sentry wrapper doesn't break existing functionality. 📋 Recommendations SummaryHigh Priority (Should address before merge)
Medium Priority (Consider for follow-up)
Low Priority (Optional improvements)
🎯 Deployment Readiness✅ Safe to Deploy: The implementation is functional and maintains backward compatibility. The missing test environment detection doesn't prevent deployment but should be addressed for cleaner test execution. 🎉 Final VerdictThis is a well-executed Sentry MCP integration that provides valuable observability enhancements while maintaining clean, minimal code changes. The main issue is the missing test environment detection, which is straightforward to fix. Great work on following the official Sentry integration patterns! |
This comment was marked as outdated.
This comment was marked as outdated.
Sorry, something went wrong.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🔭 Outside diff range comments (1)
src/utils/sentry.ts (1)
109-124: Avoid tagging env var values (PII/secret leakage + high cardinality); use contexts insteadTurning env vars into tags can leak PII/secrets (HOME, USER, PATH, tokens) and creates high-cardinality tags, degrading Sentry utility. Prefer structured contexts and a small allowlist of stable tags.
Apply this diff:
const tags: Record<string, string> = { nodeVersion: process.version, platform: process.platform, arch: process.arch, axeAvailable: axeAvailable.available ? 'true' : 'false', axeVersion: axeAvailable.version ?? 'Unknown', miseAvailable: miseAvailable.available ? 'true' : 'false', miseVersion: miseAvailable.version ?? 'Unknown', - ...Object.fromEntries(Object.entries(envVars).map(([k, v]) => [`env_${k}`, v ?? ''])), + // Intentionally avoid tagging env values to prevent PII leakage and high-cardinality tags xcodeVersion: xcodeInfo.version ?? 'Unknown', xcodePath: xcodeInfo.path ?? 'Unknown', }; Sentry.setTags(tags); + +// Provide richer context without inflating tag cardinality +Sentry.setContext('env', envVars); +Sentry.setContext('xcode', { + version: xcodeInfo.version, + path: xcodeInfo.path, + selectedXcode: xcodeInfo.selectedXcode, +});Optional: If you still want a few env-derived tags, use a strict allowlist (e.g., NODE_ENV, INCREMENTAL_BUILDS_ENABLED, SENTRY_DISABLED) and never include PATH/HOME/USER or secrets.
🧹 Nitpick comments (3)
src/utils/sentry.ts (3)
97-97: Confirm environment default; consider SENTRY_ENVIRONMENT and a safer defaultDefaulting to 'production' when NODE_ENV is unset can mislabel events. Prefer SENTRY_ENVIRONMENT first and a 'development' fallback.
- environment: process.env.NODE_ENV ?? 'production', + environment: process.env.SENTRY_ENVIRONMENT || process.env.NODE_ENV || 'development',Please confirm this aligns with your deployment conventions.
104-108: Defer expensive system probes unless telemetry is enabledTop-level execSync calls run on every import (including tests/CI) and can slow startup or fail unnecessarily. Gate these behind “telemetry enabled”.
-const axeAvailable = checkBinaryAvailability('axe'); -const miseAvailable = checkBinaryAvailability('mise'); -const envVars = getEnvironmentVariables(); -const xcodeInfo = getXcodeInfo(); +const telemetryEnabled = process.env.SENTRY_DISABLED !== 'true' && !!process.env.SENTRY_DSN; +const axeAvailable = telemetryEnabled ? checkBinaryAvailability('axe') : { available: false }; +const miseAvailable = telemetryEnabled ? checkBinaryAvailability('mise') : { available: false }; +const envVars = telemetryEnabled ? getEnvironmentVariables() : {}; +const xcodeInfo = telemetryEnabled + ? getXcodeInfo() + : { version: 'Unknown', path: 'Unknown', selectedXcode: 'Unknown' };
48-52: Redact obvious secrets from XCODEBUILDMCP_ envs*Even namespaced envs can contain tokens/keys. Redact common secret patterns at collection time.
- Object.keys(process.env).forEach((key) => { - if (key.startsWith('XCODEBUILDMCP_')) { - envVars[key] = process.env[key] ?? ''; - } - }); + Object.keys(process.env).forEach((key) => { + if (key.startsWith('XCODEBUILDMCP_')) { + const val = process.env[key] ?? ''; + // redact obvious secrets to avoid accidental leakage + envVars[key] = /(TOKEN|KEY|SECRET|PASSWORD|DSN)$/i.test(key) ? '[redacted]' : val; + } + });Follow-up: consider applying similar redaction to the initial allowlist (PATH/HOME/USER typically should not be sent as tags; contexts are safer and can still be redacted).
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
💡 Knowledge Base configuration:
- MCP integration is disabled by default for public repositories
- Jira integration is disabled by default for public repositories
- Linear integration is disabled by default for public repositories
You can enable these sources in your CodeRabbit configuration.
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
src/utils/sentry.ts(3 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🧬 Code Graph Analysis (1)
src/utils/sentry.ts (2)
src/mcp/tools/doctor/__tests__/doctor.test.ts (3)
checkBinaryAvailability(14-17)getEnvironmentVariables(30-43)getXcodeInfo(20-27)src/mcp/tools/doctor/lib/doctor.deps.ts (3)
checkBinaryAvailability(97-129)getEnvironmentVariables(159-183)getXcodeInfo(133-155)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms. You can increase the timeout in your CodeRabbit configuration to a maximum of 15 minutes (900000ms). (2)
- GitHub Check: Cursor Bugbot
- GitHub Check: claude-review
🔇 Additional comments (1)
src/utils/sentry.ts (1)
114-117: LGTM: Adding tool availability/version tags improves triageCapturing axe/mise availability and versions will help quickly diagnose environment-related failures.
| dsn: | ||
| process.env.SENTRY_DSN ?? | ||
| 'https://798607831167c7b9fe2f2912f5d3c665@o4509258288332800.ingest.de.sentry.io/4509258293837904', | ||
|
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Remove hard-coded DSN fallback; rely on env and honor SENTRY_DISABLED
Falling back to a hard-coded DSN can unintentionally exfiltrate telemetry from user machines and breaks the “graceful degradation when Sentry is not configured” promise. Disable Sentry when DSN is absent/empty and respect SENTRY_DISABLED.
Apply this diff:
- dsn:
- process.env.SENTRY_DSN ??
- 'https://798607831167c7b9fe2f2912f5d3c665@o4509258288332800.ingest.de.sentry.io/4509258293837904',
+ // Disable SDK when DSN is unset/empty; never hard-code a fallback DSN
+ dsn: process.env.SENTRY_DSN || '',
+ enabled: process.env.SENTRY_DISABLED !== 'true',📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| dsn: | |
| process.env.SENTRY_DSN ?? | |
| 'https://798607831167c7b9fe2f2912f5d3c665@o4509258288332800.ingest.de.sentry.io/4509258293837904', | |
| // Disable SDK when DSN is unset/empty; never hard-code a fallback DSN | |
| dsn: process.env.SENTRY_DSN || '', | |
| enabled: process.env.SENTRY_DISABLED !== 'true', |
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
In src/utils/sentry.ts around lines 85 to 88, remove the hard-coded Sentry DSN
fallback and make initialization rely solely on environment configuration: set
the DSN to undefined when process.env.SENTRY_DSN is missing or an empty string
(e.g., trim and check length) and add/respect a SENTRY_DISABLED flag so Sentry
is disabled if SENTRY_DISABLED is truthy or no DSN is provided; ensure the
enabled/config flag uses a boolean expression like: enabled =
!truthyEnv(SENTRY_DISABLED) && Boolean(trimmed SENTRY_DSN), so telemetry is not
sent from machines without explicit configuration.
|
Claude finished @cameroncooke's task —— View job Code Review: Sentry MCP IntegrationReview Checklist
🟢 Overall Assessment: APPROVED WITH CONCERNSThis is a clean Sentry MCP integration that follows the official Sentry pattern. The implementation is minimal and maintains backward compatibility, but there are some important issues that should be addressed. ✅ Strengths1. Correct Sentry Integration Pattern// src/server/server.ts:47
const server = Sentry.wrapMcpServerWithSentry(baseServer);
2. Appropriate SDK Version Update
3. Comprehensive System Context CollectionThe
4. Production-Ready Configuration
🔴 Critical Issues Requiring Attention1. Missing Test Environment Detection (High Priority)Issue: Current implementation always initializes Sentry, even during tests. Impact:
Current Situation:
Recommendation: Add test environment detection to // src/utils/sentry.ts - Add before Sentry.init()
const isTestEnvironment =
process.env.NODE_ENV === 'test' ||
process.env.VITEST === 'true' ||
(typeof globalThis !== 'undefined' && (globalThis as any)?.vitest);
if (!isTestEnvironment) {
Sentry.init({
// ... existing config
});
// ... tag setup
Sentry.setTags(tags);
}2. Hard-coded DSN Security Risk (High Priority)Issue: DSN is hard-coded with fallback, potentially exposing telemetry from user machines. Current: dsn: process.env.SENTRY_DSN ?? 'https://798607831167c7b9fe2f2912f5d3c665@o4509258288332800.ingest.de.sentry.io/4509258293837904',Security Risk: This breaks the "graceful degradation when Sentry is not configured" promise and could send telemetry without explicit user consent. Recommendation: Remove hard-coded fallback: dsn: process.env.SENTRY_DSN || '',
enabled: process.env.SENTRY_DSN ? true : false,3. Environment Configuration Issue (Medium Priority)Issue: Environment defaults to 'production' instead of 'development' when Current: environment: 'production', // Line 97Impact: Development issues could trigger production alerts and lead to incorrect data categorization. Recommendation: environment: process.env.NODE_ENV || 'development',🟡 Medium Priority Issues4. PII and High-Cardinality Tag ConcernsIssue: Environment variables are automatically tagged, potentially exposing PII and creating high-cardinality tags. Current: ...Object.fromEntries(Object.entries(envVars).map(([k, v]) => [`env_${k}`, v ?? ''])),Security Risk: Variables like Recommendation: Use structured contexts instead: // Replace environment variable tags with contexts
Sentry.setContext('env', envVars);
Sentry.setContext('xcode', {
version: xcodeInfo.version,
path: xcodeInfo.path,
});5. Performance ConsiderationIssue: The Impact: These heavyweight operations can add startup latency:
Recommendation: Consider deferring these to after server startup or running them asynchronously. ✅ Security AssessmentAreas of Concern
Good Security Practices
✅ Performance AssessmentRuntime Performance ✅
Startup Performance
|
Update Sentry integration to use wrapMcpServerWithSentry for enhanced observability of MCP protocol operations including tool executions, resource access, and client connections. * Update @sentry/node from v9.15.0 to v10.5.0 for MCP support * Wrap MCP server with Sentry.wrapMcpServerWithSentry() * Maintain existing Sentry configuration and system context * Enable automatic tracing of all MCP operations * Preserve compatibility with existing error tracking
cameroncooke
force-pushed
the
feature/sentry-mcp-integration
branch
from
e3fa38e to
c5ddc19
Compare
|
Claude finished @cameroncooke's task —— View job Code Review: Sentry MCP IntegrationReview Checklist
🟢 Overall Assessment: APPROVED WITH CONCERNSThis is a clean Sentry MCP integration that follows the official Sentry pattern. The implementation is minimal and maintains backward compatibility, but there are some important issues that should be addressed. ✅ Strengths1. Correct Sentry Integration Pattern// src/server/server.ts:47
const server = Sentry.wrapMcpServerWithSentry(baseServer);
2. Appropriate SDK Version Update
3. Comprehensive System Context CollectionThe
4. Production-Ready Configuration
🔴 Critical Issues Requiring Attention1. Missing Test Environment Detection (High Priority)Issue: Current implementation always initializes Sentry, even during tests. Impact:
Current Situation:
Recommendation: Add test environment detection to // src/utils/sentry.ts - Add before Sentry.init()
const isTestEnvironment =
process.env.NODE_ENV === 'test' ||
process.env.VITEST === 'true' ||
(typeof globalThis !== 'undefined' && (globalThis as any)?.vitest);
if (!isTestEnvironment) {
Sentry.init({
// ... existing config
});
// ... tag setup
Sentry.setTags(tags);
}2. Hard-coded DSN Security Risk (High Priority)Issue: DSN is hard-coded with fallback, potentially exposing telemetry from user machines. Current: dsn: process.env.SENTRY_DSN ?? 'https://798607831167c7b9fe2f2912f5d3c665@o4509258288332800.ingest.de.sentry.io/4509258293837904',Security Risk: This breaks the "graceful degradation when Sentry is not configured" promise and could send telemetry without explicit user consent. Recommendation: Remove hard-coded fallback: dsn: process.env.SENTRY_DSN || '',
enabled: process.env.SENTRY_DSN ? true : false,3. Environment Configuration Issue (Medium Priority)Issue: Environment defaults to 'production' instead of 'development' when Current: environment: 'production', // Line 97Impact: Development issues could trigger production alerts and lead to incorrect data categorization. Recommendation: environment: process.env.NODE_ENV || 'development',🟡 Medium Priority Issues4. PII and High-Cardinality Tag ConcernsIssue: Environment variables are automatically tagged, potentially exposing PII and creating high-cardinality tags. Current: ...Object.fromEntries(Object.entries(envVars).map(([k, v]) => [`env_${k}`, v ?? ''])),Security Risk: Variables like Recommendation: Use structured contexts instead: // Replace environment variable tags with contexts
Sentry.setContext('env', envVars);
Sentry.setContext('xcode', {
version: xcodeInfo.version,
path: xcodeInfo.path,
});5. Performance ConsiderationIssue: The Impact: These heavyweight operations can add startup latency:
Recommendation: Consider deferring these to after server startup or running them asynchronously. ✅ Security AssessmentAreas of Concern
Good Security Practices
✅ Performance AssessmentRuntime Performance ✅
Startup Performance
|
| axeVersion: axeAvailable.version ?? 'Unknown', | ||
| miseAvailable: miseAvailable.available ? 'true' : 'false', | ||
| miseVersion: miseAvailable.version ?? 'Unknown', | ||
| ...Object.fromEntries(Object.entries(envVars).map(([k, v]) => [`env_${k}`, v ?? ''])), |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Bug: Sentry Tag Renaming Breaks Existing Dashboards
The Sentry tag for the INCREMENTAL_BUILDS_ENABLED environment variable changed from env_XCODEMAKE_ENABLED to env_INCREMENTAL_BUILDS_ENABLED. This breaking change in tag naming, caused by the new generic environment variable mapping, could affect existing Sentry dashboards and alerts.
1 participant
Summary
Integrates Sentry's Model Context Protocol (MCP) server instrumentation to provide enhanced observability for all MCP operations including tool executions, resource access, and client connections.
Background/Details
Implementation Requirements
Technical Context
src/utils/sentry.tswith environment detectionsrc/server/server.tsneeds instrumentation wrapperSolution
1. Sentry SDK Update
@sentry/nodedependency from^9.15.0to^10.5.02. MCP Server Instrumentation
Sentry.wrapMcpServerWithSentry()insrc/server/server.ts3. Configuration Reuse
Key Implementation Details
Testing
Validation Method
Comprehensive black-box testing using Reloaderoo inspect commands to validate MCP integration:
Tools Tested Successfully
Sentry Data Flow Validation
Quality Assurance
All mandatory quality checks passed:
npm run build- No errorsnpm run typecheck- Zero TypeScript errorsnpm run lint- All rules passednpm run format:check- Properly formattednpm run test- All tests passingTest Coverage
Notes
Benefits Achieved
Deployment Considerations
Future Enhancements
Technical Debt
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Chores