-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.9k
Java: add more Spring RestTemplate request forgery sinks #20930
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merged
owen-mc
merged 6 commits into
github:main
from
owen-mc:java/spring-rest-template-request-forgery-sinks
Jan 15, 2026
+478
−145
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
6 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
969b0cf
Add SSRF sinks for `uriVariables` arguments of more methods on Spring…
owen-mc 42c955e
Add change note
owen-mc 8debe49
Correct mistake in qldoc
owen-mc 89546cb
Fix qldoc inaccuracies
owen-mc 9f2a7f7
Apply suggestion from @owen-mc
owen-mc 97e0b4e
Use parameter name to only select correct overloads
owen-mc File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
4 changes: 4 additions & 0 deletions
4
java/ql/lib/change-notes/2025-11-27-spring-rest-template-request-forgery-sinks.md
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
| Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
|---|---|---|
| @@ -0,0 +1,4 @@ | ||
| --- | ||
| category: minorAnalysis | ||
| --- | ||
| * URI template variables of all Spring `RestTemplate` methods are now considered as request forgery sinks. Previously only the `getForObject` method was considered. This may lead to more alerts for the query `java/ssrf`. |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
patchForObject?uriVariablesparameter. Is that intended?Another approach could be to declare something like
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
patchForObjectis in the list of method names, and it is tested. I'm not sure what you mean. But it's probably irrelevant, because of the next point.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Ups, sorry - didn't see it in the list.