Skip to content

Conversation

@paperbenni
Copy link
Member

@paperbenni paperbenni commented Jan 28, 2026

⚡ Bolt: Remove blocking XSync from drw_map

💡 What: Removed XSync(drw->dpy, False) from drw_map in drw.c.
🎯 Why: XSync is a blocking call that forces the client to wait for the X server to process requests. In a drawing loop, this causes unnecessary latency and jank, especially under load or network latency.
📊 Impact: Reduced latency for all bar and window drawing operations.
🔬 Measurement: Verify code no longer contains XSync in drw_map.


PR created automatically by Jules for task 1875585114436176726 started by @paperbenni

Summary by Sourcery

Remove a blocking XSync call from the drawing routine to reduce rendering latency and document the change in Bolt’s journal.

Enhancements:

  • Improve drawing performance by eliminating the synchronous X server round-trip in drw_map.

Documentation:

  • Add a Bolt journal entry explaining the impact of XSync in the drawing loop and the rationale for its removal.

Removing `XSync` from `drw_map` in `drw.c` eliminates a blocking round-trip to the X server during every drawing operation (e.g., bar updates). This significantly improves UI responsiveness and reduces latency, as the event loop or `XFlush` handles buffer flushing asynchronously.

Also added `.jules/bolt.md` to document this learning.

Co-authored-by: paperbenni <15818888+paperbenni@users.noreply.github.com>
@google-labs-jules
Copy link
Contributor

👋 Jules, reporting for duty! I'm here to lend a hand with this pull request.

When you start a review, I'll add a 👀 emoji to each comment to let you know I've read it. I'll focus on feedback directed at me and will do my best to stay out of conversations between you and other bots or reviewers to keep the noise down.

I'll push a commit with your requested changes shortly after. Please note there might be a delay between these steps, but rest assured I'm on the job!

For more direct control, you can switch me to Reactive Mode. When this mode is on, I will only act on comments where you specifically mention me with @jules. You can find this option in the Pull Request section of your global Jules UI settings. You can always switch back!

New to Jules? Learn more at jules.google/docs.


For security, I will only act on instructions from the user who triggered this task.

@coderabbitai
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Jan 28, 2026

Important

Review skipped

Auto reviews are disabled on base/target branches other than the default branch.

Please check the settings in the CodeRabbit UI or the .coderabbit.yaml file in this repository. To trigger a single review, invoke the @coderabbitai review command.

You can disable this status message by setting the reviews.review_status to false in the CodeRabbit configuration file.

  • 🔍 Trigger a full review

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.

@sourcery-ai
Copy link

sourcery-ai bot commented Jan 28, 2026

Reviewer's guide (collapsed on small PRs)

Reviewer's Guide

Removes a blocking XSync call from the drw_map drawing routine to avoid forced round-trips to the X server, and adds a Bolt journal note documenting the change and rationale.

Sequence diagram for drw_map drawing without blocking XSync

sequenceDiagram
    participant Client as ClientApp
    participant Drw as Drw
    participant Xlib as Xlib
    participant XServer as XServer

    Client->>Drw: drw_map(drw, win, x, y, w, h)
    Drw->>Xlib: XCopyArea(drw->dpy, drw->drawable, win, drw->gc, x, y, w, h, x, y)
    Xlib-->>Drw: return (request buffered)
    Drw-->>Client: return

    Client->>Xlib: XNextEvent or XFlush
    Xlib->>XServer: send buffered requests
    XServer-->>Xlib: process draw requests
    Xlib-->>Client: events delivered (async)

    rect rgb(240,240,240)
        Note over Client,XServer: No XSync call, no blocking round-trip per drw_map
    end
Loading

File-Level Changes

Change Details Files
Make drw_map non-blocking with respect to X server synchronization.
  • Remove the XSync(drw->dpy, False) call after XCopyArea in the drw_map function so drawing no longer waits for the X server to process requests
drw.c
Document the performance learning about XSync and drawing loops.
  • Add a Bolt journal markdown file explaining why XSync is harmful in tight drawing loops and clarifying that XNextEvent or XFlush will handle flushing asynchronously
.jules/bolt.md

Tips and commands

Interacting with Sourcery

  • Trigger a new review: Comment @sourcery-ai review on the pull request.
  • Continue discussions: Reply directly to Sourcery's review comments.
  • Generate a GitHub issue from a review comment: Ask Sourcery to create an
    issue from a review comment by replying to it. You can also reply to a
    review comment with @sourcery-ai issue to create an issue from it.
  • Generate a pull request title: Write @sourcery-ai anywhere in the pull
    request title to generate a title at any time. You can also comment
    @sourcery-ai title on the pull request to (re-)generate the title at any time.
  • Generate a pull request summary: Write @sourcery-ai summary anywhere in
    the pull request body to generate a PR summary at any time exactly where you
    want it. You can also comment @sourcery-ai summary on the pull request to
    (re-)generate the summary at any time.
  • Generate reviewer's guide: Comment @sourcery-ai guide on the pull
    request to (re-)generate the reviewer's guide at any time.
  • Resolve all Sourcery comments: Comment @sourcery-ai resolve on the
    pull request to resolve all Sourcery comments. Useful if you've already
    addressed all the comments and don't want to see them anymore.
  • Dismiss all Sourcery reviews: Comment @sourcery-ai dismiss on the pull
    request to dismiss all existing Sourcery reviews. Especially useful if you
    want to start fresh with a new review - don't forget to comment
    @sourcery-ai review to trigger a new review!

Customizing Your Experience

Access your dashboard to:

  • Enable or disable review features such as the Sourcery-generated pull request
    summary, the reviewer's guide, and others.
  • Change the review language.
  • Add, remove or edit custom review instructions.
  • Adjust other review settings.

Getting Help

Copy link

@sourcery-ai sourcery-ai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Hey - I've left some high level feedback:

  • If any callers of drw_map were implicitly relying on XSync for ordering or avoiding flicker (e.g., before reading back pixels or interacting with other X operations), consider documenting the asynchronous behavior now or adding explicit syncs at those specific call sites instead of globally in drw_map.
  • Confirm that .jules/bolt.md is intended to live in the main repo and not in a local/ephemeral tooling directory; if it’s tooling-specific metadata, it may be better tracked outside the source tree or added to ignore rules.
Prompt for AI Agents
Please address the comments from this code review:

## Overall Comments
- If any callers of `drw_map` were implicitly relying on `XSync` for ordering or avoiding flicker (e.g., before reading back pixels or interacting with other X operations), consider documenting the asynchronous behavior now or adding explicit syncs at those specific call sites instead of globally in `drw_map`.
- Confirm that `.jules/bolt.md` is intended to live in the main repo and not in a local/ephemeral tooling directory; if it’s tooling-specific metadata, it may be better tracked outside the source tree or added to ignore rules.

Sourcery is free for open source - if you like our reviews please consider sharing them ✨
Help me be more useful! Please click 👍 or 👎 on each comment and I'll use the feedback to improve your reviews.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants