Conversation
to omit the timestamp and thus produce reproducible compression output which has a chance to match the original
this can help to get closer to identical files after applying deltas
|
I'd like to stall this for a moment. There's a licensing question: The change looks good. On Sun, Oct 4, 2015 at 9:56 AM, Bernhard M. Wiedemann <
|
|
I happen to know a bit about open-source licensing and remember that for example there is no public-domain in Germany, so licensing under the CC0 license ( https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ ) would be the closest you could get. But for some reason few people do that for code and rather chose the MIT, X11 or BSD (2- or 3-clause) license if they wanted to be very permissive or GPLv2 or GPLv3+ if they want other people to contribute back. |
|
any update on this? |
|
Hi, |
|
I rebased my branch ontop of your release3_0_apl branch. Want to re-open this PR or should I open a new one? |
|
moved to #255 |
one bugfix
and three commits that help to get closer to identical compressed files after applying deltas