Replace identical data test with precise delta validation test#160
Open
x86girl wants to merge 1 commit intolightspeed-core:mainfrom
Open
Conversation
Replaced test_compare_score_distributions_identical_data with test_compare_score_distributions_precise_delta to provide more meaningful validation. The new test validates behavior with a precise 0.001 mean difference instead of identical values, using reasonable floating-point tolerance (1e-6) and verifying mean calculations, relative change percentage, and that statistical tests correctly report non-significance for small differences with small sample sizes. This change improves test coverage by validating real-world scenarios where differences are measurable but not statistically significant, rather than testing the trivial case of identical data where difference is exactly zero.
Contributor
WalkthroughA test method in the evaluation comparison test suite was renamed from Changes
Estimated code review effort🎯 2 (Simple) | ⏱️ ~8 minutes 🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 4✅ Passed checks (4 passed)
✏️ Tip: You can configure your own custom pre-merge checks in the settings. ✨ Finishing touches
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
Tip Issue Planner is now in beta. Read the docs and try it out! Share your feedback on Discord. Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. Comment |
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
Contributor
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🤖 Fix all issues with AI agents
In `@tests/script/test_compare_evaluations.py`:
- Around line 197-205: The docstring for the test of
_compare_score_distributions claims it verifies that small mean differences are
not statistically significant, but the test body never asserts on the
statistical results; either update the test to assert non-significance (e.g.,
check result["tests"]["t_test"]["significant"] and
result["tests"]["mann_whitney_u"]["significant"] are False and optionally assert
the relative change percentage in result["summary"]["relative_change"]) or
simplify the docstring to only describe what is actually asserted; modify the
test function that calls _compare_score_distributions to add the explicit
significance assertions (and any relative change assertion) or remove the
leftover task-like sentence ("Add relative change percentage") from the
docstring so they match.
Comment on lines
+197
to
+205
| """ | ||
| Test _compare_score_distributions with a precise mean difference of 0.001. | ||
|
|
||
| Validates that small differences are calculated correctly but not detected | ||
| as statistically significant with small sample sizes. This test ensures | ||
| the implementation correctly handles: | ||
| 1. Accurate calculation of mean differences | ||
| 2. Add relative change percentage | ||
| """ |
Contributor
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Docstring is inconsistent with actual assertions.
The docstring states the test "Validates that small differences are … not detected as statistically significant with small sample sizes," but the test body never asserts on the statistical test results (e.g., result["tests"]["t_test"]["significant"] or result["tests"]["mann_whitney_u"]["significant"]). The PR objectives also list verifying "that statistical tests report non-significance" as a goal.
Additionally, item "2. Add relative change percentage" reads like a leftover task-list entry rather than a description of what the test validates.
Consider either adding assertions for non-significance or trimming the docstring to match what is actually tested.
Suggested additions
assert (
abs(result["relative_change"] - expected_rel_change) < 0.01
), f"Relative change mismatch. Expected {expected_rel_change:.4f}%, got {result['relative_change']:.4f}%"
+
+ # Verify small delta is not statistically significant with small sample size
+ if "t_test" in result["tests"]:
+ assert result["tests"]["t_test"]["significant"] is False, (
+ "T-test should not detect significance for a 0.001 mean difference with n=5"
+ )
+ if "mann_whitney_u" in result["tests"]:
+ assert result["tests"]["mann_whitney_u"]["significant"] is False, (
+ "Mann-Whitney U should not detect significance for a 0.001 mean difference with n=5"
+ )And fix the docstring:
"""
Test _compare_score_distributions with a precise mean difference of 0.001.
Validates that small differences are calculated correctly but not detected
as statistically significant with small sample sizes. This test ensures
the implementation correctly handles:
1. Accurate calculation of mean differences
- 2. Add relative change percentage
+ 2. Relative change percentage computation
+ 3. Non-significance of statistical tests for tiny deltas
"""🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
In `@tests/script/test_compare_evaluations.py` around lines 197 - 205, The
docstring for the test of _compare_score_distributions claims it verifies that
small mean differences are not statistically significant, but the test body
never asserts on the statistical results; either update the test to assert
non-significance (e.g., check result["tests"]["t_test"]["significant"] and
result["tests"]["mann_whitney_u"]["significant"] are False and optionally assert
the relative change percentage in result["summary"]["relative_change"]) or
simplify the docstring to only describe what is actually asserted; modify the
test function that calls _compare_score_distributions to add the explicit
significance assertions (and any relative change assertion) or remove the
leftover task-like sentence ("Add relative change percentage") from the
docstring so they match.
Member
VladimirKadlec
left a comment
VladimirKadlec
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Thank you, good catch! One small suggestion :-)
Comment on lines
+215
to
+220
| # Use reasonable tolerance for floating point comparisons | ||
| tolerance = 1e-6 | ||
|
|
||
| assert ( | ||
| abs(result["run1_stats"]["mean"] - expected_mean1) < tolerance | ||
| ), f"Baseline mean mismatch. Expected {expected_mean1}, got {result['run1_stats']['mean']}" |
Member
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I suggest using pytest.approx
Suggested change
| # Use reasonable tolerance for floating point comparisons | |
| tolerance = 1e-6 | |
| assert ( | |
| abs(result["run1_stats"]["mean"] - expected_mean1) < tolerance | |
| ), f"Baseline mean mismatch. Expected {expected_mean1}, got {result['run1_stats']['mean']}" | |
| assert ( | |
| result["run1_stats"]["mean"] == pytest.approx(expected_mean1) | |
| ), f"Baseline mean mismatch. Expected {expected_mean1}, got {result['run1_stats']['mean']}" |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Replaced test_compare_score_distributions_identical_data with test_compare_score_distributions_precise_delta to provide more meaningful validation.
The new test validates behavior with a precise 0.001 mean difference instead of identical values, using reasonable floating-point tolerance (1e-6) and verifying mean calculations,
relative change percentage, and that statistical tests correctly report non-significance for small differences with small sample sizes.
This change improves test coverage by validating real-world scenarios where differences are measurable but not statistically significant,
rather than testing the trivial case of identical data where difference is exactly zero.
Description
Type of change
Tools used to create PR
Identify any AI code assistants used in this PR (for transparency and review context)
Related Tickets & Documents
Checklist before requesting a review
Testing
Summary by CodeRabbit