DO NOT MERGE: Use llamastack model identifier, not provider resource id, to refer to a model

[bparees]

No description provided.

[bparees]

this change needs to be coordinated with lightspeed-core/lightspeed-stack#368

[bparees]

@eyevana i'm not sure what the merge process is for this repo, but we need to make sure this doesn't actually merge until we resolve some conversations and resolve/merge the changes in lightspeed-core/lightspeed-stack#368

[eyevana]

@bparees yes, I'm holding off until I get the green-light from you. @jrobertboos correct me if I'm wrong, but the merge process is pretty informal right? Do you communicate with anyone/team when fixes are applied in the main branch?

[bparees]

github issue for the upstream llamastack behavior aspects of this:
llamastack/llama-stack#3116

[jrobertboos]

Hi @eyevana and @bparees, sorry for the delayed response I have been out backpacking since Saturday :). Yea the merge process for this repo is really informal, I don't really have to communicate with anyone about patches or fixes, for larger changes I will often times let the LCORE team take a look or demo the new feature/change.

[bparees]

i've opened https://issues.redhat.com/browse/LCORE-600 to track resolving this behavior.