Skip to content

macOS Support#584

Merged
luciusDXL merged 3 commits intoluciusDXL:masterfrom
MacSourcePorts:master
Jan 26, 2026
Merged

macOS Support#584
luciusDXL merged 3 commits intoluciusDXL:masterfrom
MacSourcePorts:master

Conversation

@tomkidd
Copy link
Contributor

@tomkidd tomkidd commented Dec 26, 2025

This PR represents the changes I made to create the build I use on Mac Source Ports

https://www.macsourceports.com/game/swdf

As mentioned in the comments, it's a combination of PR #473 from @apancik, this comment from @gilmorem560 about updating AngelScript, and a couple of additional tweaks.

It might be better to rebase the original PR (I want to make sure credit is given where it's due), and one of the tweaks is App Bundle specific so I'm not sure if that's the best way to handle path names, but in any event here's my contribution upstream.

@apancik
Copy link
Contributor

apancik commented Dec 27, 2025

Given that #473 has been open for about a year, I’m not sure where it sits in the maintainers’ queue.

Just in case, I’ve rebased and force-pushed the PR branch of #473. If you rebase my branch onto yours, we can preserve the history. Then I can close my PR and we can keep this one up. I can do the rebase too, but I’d prefer you do it so GitHub doesn’t end up attributing me as a co-author on your commits.

I tested that flow locally and it worked: everything compiles cleanly.

@luciusDXL
Copy link
Owner

I have been away for a while, I will review this soon. Thanks for the hard work.

@luciusDXL
Copy link
Owner

@tomkidd I merged the previous Mac OS work, so if you can rebase against that I can get this merged as well. :)

This is based on two things.

PR luciusDXL#473 from @apancik
luciusDXL#473

The comment from @gilmorem560 that updated AngelScript code resolves compilation issues on Apple Silicon
luciusDXL#90 (comment)
https://www.angelcode.com/angelscript/

The code changes are sort of like a manual rebase of luciusDXL#473 so perhaps a proper rebase of that and the manual grafting of AngelScript would be a better solution. In any event I want to give credit to the people who really did the work.
clang doesn't like this one instruction on Intel so I commented it out
Necessary to get the engine to work in an App Bundle.
@tomkidd
Copy link
Contributor Author

tomkidd commented Jan 25, 2026

OK, I've rebased it. Thanks.

@luciusDXL luciusDXL merged commit daceeeb into luciusDXL:master Jan 26, 2026
2 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants