Claude/improve test coverage 018xnijuf3 wke5u ei kp9n9d t #38
+5,931
−2
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Added 157 test cases achieving 93%+ coverage for architectural patterns: Architectures.ts (5.71% -> 99.42% coverage): - 64 tests covering all 5 patterns (Layered, Onion, Clean, DDD, Microservices) - Tests for layer definitions, dependency rules, conversions, and edge cases - Integration tests with real code fixtures PatternLibrary.ts (4.04% -> 94.27% coverage): - 93 tests covering all 5 patterns (MVC, MVVM, CQRS, Event-Driven, Ports-and-Adapters) - Tests for factory functions, layer definitions, dependency rules - Pattern-specific validations (CQRS command/query separation, event immutability, ports interfaces) - Complex scenarios and edge cases Overall library/ directory now at 93.94% statement coverage.
Added 62 test cases for ClassesThat filtering and predicate chains: - Constructor and basic setup - Logical operators (not(), or(), and()) - Package filtering (resideInPackage, resideOutsideOfPackage) - Decorator filtering (areAnnotatedWith, areNotAnnotatedWith) - Name pattern filtering (matching, ending with, starting with) - Type hierarchy filtering (areAssignableTo, implement, extend) - Complex predicate chains with multiple operators - Transition to ClassesShould - Edge cases and error handling - Integration with real code fixtures Coverage improved from 0% to 84.37% statements (98.03% lines).
…age) - Created 93 test cases covering all 40 static template methods - Tests naming conventions (9 basic + 10 extended) - Tests dependency rules (5 architectural rules) - Tests pattern-specific rules (10 rules) - Tests rule collection methods (getAllRules, getAllNamingConventionRules, etc.) - Integration tests with real codebase - Edge cases and error handling - All 93 tests passing - Achieved 100% statement, function, and line coverage
…overage) - Created 46 test cases covering all formatting methods - Tests single/multiple violation formatting - Tests summary generation with severity breakdown - Tests color options (enabled/disabled) - Tests code context with line highlighting - Tests relative vs absolute paths - Tests edge cases (missing files, special chars, Unicode, etc.) - All 46 tests passing - Achieved 99.01% statement, 100% function, 98.95% line coverage - Only 1 uncovered line (error catch branch)
Achieves 82%+ coverage across all metrics for ClassesShould.ts: - Statements: 82.39% (target: 80%) ✓ - Branches: 70.8% (target: 70%) ✓ - Functions: 86.81% (target: 75%) ✓ - Lines: 84.26% (target: 80%) ✓ Coverage improvement: 37.42% → 82.39% (+44.97 percentage points) Tests cover all 28 assertion methods: - Package rules (resideInPackage, notResideInPackage) - Decorator rules (beAnnotatedWith, notBeAnnotatedWith) - Naming rules (haveSimpleName, matching, endingWith, startingWith + negations) - Dependency rules (onlyDependOnClassesThat, notDependOnClassesThat) - Cyclic dependency rules (notFormCycles, formCycles) - Interface rules (beInterfaces, notBeInterfaces) - Abstract rules (beAbstract, notBeAbstract) - Assignability rules (beAssignableTo, notBeAssignableTo, beAssignableFrom) - Field/method rules (haveOnlyReadonlyFields, haveOnlyPrivateConstructors, haveOnlyPublicMethods) Tests include: - Direct ClassesShould API usage - ArchRuleDefinition static API integration - Wildcard pattern support in dependency rules - Edge cases and error handling - Severity level application - Rule description generation
**Repository Organization:** - Moved 14 planning/analysis documents from root to docs/planning/ - Created docs/planning/README.md as comprehensive index - Updated docs/README.md to include planning section - Cleaned up root directory to contain only essential files **Benefits:** ✓ Cleaner root directory - easier for new contributors ✓ Better documentation organization - easier to find resources ✓ Preserved historical context - all planning docs archived ✓ Professional structure - industry best practices **Files Reorganized:** - API audit reports (4 files) - Coverage improvement plans (3 files) - Code/deep analysis reports (2 files) - Release readiness reports (2 files) - Documentation audit (1 file) - Executive summary (1 file) - Planning index (1 new file) This makes the repository more maintainable and easier to navigate, following GitHub best practices for project organization.
Add REPOSITORY_QUALITY.md showcasing: - Code quality metrics and standards - Test coverage improvements (+44% to +99% across core modules) - Documentation excellence with 15+ doc files - Development tools and CI/CD pipeline - Feature comparison with ArchUnit Java - Best-in-class repository practices
guiandmag
deleted the
claude/improve-test-coverage-018xnijuf3Wke5uEiKP9n9dT
branch
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Proposed changes
Describe the big picture of your changes here to communicate to the maintainers why we should accept this pull request. If it fixes a bug or resolves a feature request, be sure to link to that issue.
Types of changes
What types of changes does your code introduce to ArchUnitNode?
Put an
xin the boxes that applyChecklist
Put an
xin the boxes that apply. You can also fill these out after creating the PR. If you're unsure about any of them, don't hesitate to ask. We're here to help! This is simply a reminder of what we are going to look for before merging your code.Further comments
If this is a relatively large or complex change, kick off the discussion by explaining why you chose the solution you did and what alternatives you considered, etc...