Skip to content

Comments

attempt to get coderabbitai to review drafts#2802

Merged
rrayst merged 1 commit intomasterfrom
full-coderabbitai-config
Feb 20, 2026
Merged

attempt to get coderabbitai to review drafts#2802
rrayst merged 1 commit intomasterfrom
full-coderabbitai-config

Conversation

@rrayst
Copy link
Member

@rrayst rrayst commented Feb 18, 2026

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features
    • Expanded configuration options for code reviews, including incremental reviews and auto-pause settings.
    • Added support for configuring multiple tools, linters, formatters, and CI check integrations.
    • Introduced new sections for finishing touches, pre-merge checks, and knowledge base management.
    • Added integration options and policy configurations for enhanced code guidance and issue handling.

@coderabbitai
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Feb 18, 2026

Warning

Ignoring CodeRabbit configuration file changes. For security, only the configuration from the base branch is applied for open source repositories.

📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

This pull request expands the .coderabbit.yaml configuration file, replacing a single legacy auto_review flag with a comprehensive auto_review block and introducing multiple new top-level configuration sections including finishing_touches, pre_merge_checks, tools, chat, knowledge_base, code_generation, and issue_enrichment with numerous nested options and defaults.

Changes

Cohort / File(s) Summary
Configuration Expansion
.coderabbit.yaml
Replaces legacy single-flag auto_review with structured block containing multiple control options; adds 7 new top-level sections (finishing_touches, pre_merge_checks, tools, chat, knowledge_base, code_generation, issue_enrichment) with nested tool toggles, integration settings (jira, linear), and policy configuration knobs.

Estimated code review effort

🎯 3 (Moderate) | ⏱️ ~20 minutes

Possibly related PRs

Suggested reviewers

  • predic8

Poem

🐰 Configuration blooms in structured delight,
New sections emerge, shining so bright,
Tools and integrations in harmony align,
Defaults now richer, oh how they shine!
CodeRabbit hops through configs with glee ✨

🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 2 | ❌ 1

❌ Failed checks (1 warning)

Check name Status Explanation Resolution
Title check ⚠️ Warning The PR title mentions getting CodeRabbitAI to review drafts, but the actual change is a comprehensive expansion of the .coderabbit.yaml configuration file with 218+ lines of new configuration options across multiple sections (finishing_touches, pre_merge_checks, tools, chat, etc.), which is much broader than just the draft review feature. Update the title to reflect the actual scope of changes, such as 'Expand .coderabbit.yaml configuration with comprehensive review and tooling settings' or similar to accurately represent the multi-section configuration expansion.
✅ Passed checks (2 passed)
Check name Status Explanation
Description Check ✅ Passed Check skipped - CodeRabbit’s high-level summary is enabled.
Docstring Coverage ✅ Passed No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check.

✏️ Tip: You can configure your own custom pre-merge checks in the settings.

✨ Finishing Touches
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
  • Create PR with unit tests
  • Post copyable unit tests in a comment
  • Commit unit tests in branch full-coderabbitai-config

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
.coderabbit.yaml (1)

1-220: Consider trimming to only non-default values.

Nearly every value in this file matches the schema default. Explicitly listing ~220 lines of defaults creates maintenance overhead — if CodeRabbit updates a default upstream, this pinned config will silently shadow it. A minimal config achieving the same goal would be:

# yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json
reviews:
  auto_review:
    drafts: true

All other values would automatically inherit their schema defaults. If the intent is to lock in current defaults as a snapshot, consider adding a comment at the top explaining that rationale.

🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
Verify each finding against the current code and only fix it if needed.

In @.coderabbit.yaml around lines 1 - 220, The YAML currently enumerates nearly
all schema defaults, causing maintenance burden and accidental shadowing; trim
the file to only non-default customizations by removing redundant fields and
keep just the explicit overrides (e.g., preserve reviews.auto_review.drafts:
true or any other intentional settings) so the rest inherits upstream defaults
from the schema; if you intend this file as a snapshot of defaults, add a
top-of-file comment stating that the file purposely pins current defaults for
auditing rather than overriding behavior.
🤖 Prompt for all review comments with AI agents
Verify each finding against the current code and only fix it if needed.

Nitpick comments:
In @.coderabbit.yaml:
- Around line 1-220: The YAML currently enumerates nearly all schema defaults,
causing maintenance burden and accidental shadowing; trim the file to only
non-default customizations by removing redundant fields and keep just the
explicit overrides (e.g., preserve reviews.auto_review.drafts: true or any other
intentional settings) so the rest inherits upstream defaults from the schema; if
you intend this file as a snapshot of defaults, add a top-of-file comment
stating that the file purposely pins current defaults for auditing rather than
overriding behavior.

@rrayst rrayst merged commit 1c76aa7 into master Feb 20, 2026
5 checks passed
@rrayst rrayst deleted the full-coderabbitai-config branch February 20, 2026 11:50
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants