Masking changes to hail_size plugin

[lambert-p]

Description
After a scientific assurance review (EPPT-2792: Hail Size - Science Assurance) it was shown that the EPP workflow for hail size is not consistent with the parameter it is replacing (shown in GPP display). As a result, this suggests that something is going wrong within the EPP workflow, potentially due to a missing or misconfigured processing step.

To ensure consistency and reliability across platforms, it is recommended that the EPP workflow be reviewed in detail, with particular attention paid to the hail_size IMPROVER plugin.

The problem needs to be identified and the workflow adjusted so we can ensure that the science has been implemented correctly and thus we can scientifically assure that the diagnostics produced from EPP Workflows match the diagnostics we are replacing.

User Story

As a scientist I would like the hail size workflow design reviewed.

Currently the hail size output from the EPP workflow is not consistent with the GPP display.

I would like the hail size EPP workflow to be investigated, identifying where there may be gaps or errors in the workflow design that is causing the inconsistencies between the workflow and GPP display output.

After the issue has been identified the workflow should be updated so the output is consistent with the GPP display, this can then be scientifically assured.

Testing:

• Ran tests and they passed OK
• Added new tests for the new feature(s)

[github-actions]

In order to maintain a backlog of relevant PRs, we automatically label them as stale after 60 days of inactivity.

If this PR is still important to you, then please comment on this PR and the stale label will be removed.

Otherwise this PR will be automatically closed in 30 days time.