Add documentation for native gRPC compatibility vs transport #2819
+347
−3
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Users report
grpcurlfailing with "unknown service" errors when usinggrpc.NewTransport(). The gRPC transport uses gRPC as a communication layer (like NATS or RabbitMQ) but doesn't provide native gRPC interoperability. Native gRPC clients require the gRPC server/client packages instead.Changes
guides/grpc-compatibility.md: Documents transport vs server/client distinction, when to use each, complete examples, and common error solutionstransport.md: Added warning section clarifying transport ≠ native gRPC compatibilityplugins.md: Added Server/Client to interfaces list with gRPC exampleguides/comparison.md: Fixed gRPC integration example to show both server and clientCorrect Usage
go-micro.dev/v5/transport/grpcgo-micro.dev/v5/server/grpcgo-micro.dev/v5/client/grpcOriginal prompt
✨ Let Copilot coding agent set things up for you — coding agent works faster and does higher quality work when set up for your repo.