Skip to content

Conversation

Copy link

Copilot AI commented May 19, 2025

This PR fixes the inconsistency in the sub-models documentation where the example showed a sub-model with order 2 ({ PLATFORM, CPUS, RAM, HDD } @ 2), but the explanation and diagram that followed referenced using PICT with order 3 (/o:3).

The inconsistency made the documentation confusing and could lead readers to misunderstand how sub-models function, as noted in issue #95.

Changes made:

  • Updated all references to /o:3 in the explanation to /o:2 to match the example
  • Updated the diagram to show order = 2 instead of order = 3
  • Updated the statistics about test case counts to reflect the correct numbers with /o:2 (approximately 40 test cases with sub-model vs. 17 without)

These changes make the documentation consistent and clearer for readers to understand the impact of using sub-models with PICT.

Fixes #95.


💡 You can make Copilot smarter by setting up custom instructions, customizing its development environment and configuring Model Context Protocol (MCP) servers. Learn more Copilot coding agent tips in the docs.

Co-authored-by: jaccz <9115223+jaccz@users.noreply.github.com>
Copilot AI changed the title [WIP] Documentation on sub-models Fix documentation inconsistency in sub-models example May 19, 2025
Copilot AI requested a review from jaccz May 19, 2025 17:40
Copilot finished work on behalf of jaccz May 19, 2025 17:40
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Documentation on sub-models

2 participants