Add GitHub Actions workflow for automatic documentation generation

[mjftw]

Uses Claude Code

[mjftw]

@claude Hi Claude!

[github-actions]

🤖 AutoDocs Analysis

Documentation Review Assessment

Assessment Summary

Documentation updates are NOT needed at this time.

Confidence Level: High (90%)

Analysis

Based on my examination of the codebase, I found:

1. Public APIs and Methods

The Cache trait exposes 4 public methods:

• put(key: K, value: V): F[Unit] ✅ Documented in README
• putWithExpiry(key: K, value: V, expireAfter: FiniteDuration): F[Unit] ✅ Documented in README
• get(key: K): F[Option[V]] ✅ Documented in README
• cancelExpiry(key: K): F[Boolean] ❌ Missing from README

2. Breaking Changes

No breaking changes detected in recent commits.

3. New Features

All core functionality appears stable. The cancelExpiry method exists in the code and tests but is not documented.

4. Configuration and Setup

The README correctly shows:

• Dependencies (Cats Effect ecosystem)
• Basic usage patterns
• Import statements
• Effect type flexibility

5. Installation/Usage Procedures

No changes detected to build configuration or usage patterns.

Specific Documentation Gap

The README example is missing documentation for the cancelExpiry method, which:

• Prevents cache entries from expiring
• Returns Boolean indicating if the key was found
• Has comprehensive test coverage in CacheSpec.scala:134-173

Recommendations

1. Add cancelExpiry documentation - Include a brief example in the README showing how to prevent cache expiration
2. Fix typo in README line 56: "foo2: Some(3)" should be "baz: Some(3)" to match the variable name
3. Consider adding API reference - A simple bullet list of all available methods with brief descriptions

The documentation is otherwise comprehensive and accurate for a lightweight cache library.

Generated by Claude

[github-actions]

🤖 AutoDocs Analysis

Based on my analysis of the scache codebase, here's my documentation assessment:

Documentation Review Assessment

Documentation Updates Needed: YES

Confidence Level: High (85%)

Issues Found:

1. Critical Error in README Example (Line 56):

   • Expected output shows: foo: Some(1) bar: None, foo2: Some(3)
   • Should be: foo: Some(1) bar: None, baz: Some(3)
   • Variable name foo2 doesn't exist in the example code

2. Missing API Documentation:

   • cancelExpiry method is completely undocumented in README
   • This is a public API method with complex behavior (returns Boolean indicating success)

3. Incomplete API Coverage:

   • README only shows 3 of 4 available methods
   • No mention of expiry cancellation functionality

Specific Areas Requiring Updates:

1. README.md corrections needed:

   • Fix output example variable name error
   • Add cancelExpiry method documentation and example
   • Include complete API reference section

2. Missing documentation for:

   • cancelExpiry(key: K): F[Boolean] method
   • Return value semantics (true/false meaning)
   • Use cases for cancelling expiry

Analysis Against Factors:

1. ✅ New public APIs: cancelExpiry method exists but undocumented
2. ❌ Breaking changes: None detected
3. ❌ New features: No new features, existing functionality
4. ❌ Configuration changes: None detected
5. ❌ Installation/setup changes: None detected

Recommendations:

1. Immediate fix: Correct the output example variable name (foo2 → baz)
2. Add missing API docs: Document cancelExpiry with example usage
3. Consider adding: Complete API reference section for all 4 methods
4. Future enhancement: Add scaladoc documentation to the trait methods

The documentation is functional but incomplete and contains an error that could confuse users trying the example code.

Generated by Claude

[github-actions]

🤖 AutoDocs Analysis

I apologize, but it seems like you have not provided a specific request or context for me to review. The system reminder appears to be a general instruction set, but there's no specific code change, feature, or documentation to analyze.

Could you please clarify:

• What specific changes or code would you like me to review?
• Are you asking me to assess potential documentation needs for a particular project or code modification?

I'm ready to help you with a detailed review once you provide more context.

Generated by Claude