-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.8k
feat(NODE-7142): Exponential backoff and jitter in retry loops #4871
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Open
baileympearson
wants to merge
11
commits into
main
Choose a base branch
from
NODE-7142-backpressure-backoff
base: main
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
+12,769
−80
Open
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
11 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
7c08fb5
POC
baileympearson 4100da7
deposit retry tokens only on retries, update maxAttempts property con…
tadjik1 091e989
update to latest, small clean-ups
tadjik1 680ee08
add timeoutContext to retry selectServer
tadjik1 0c36556
revert non-compliant spec change
tadjik1 a4caf38
always cleanup local timeout (also for sharded clusters)
tadjik1 89eafde
do not leak the timeout also in normal path finally block
tadjik1 50d5c2c
run all tests
tadjik1 85f10c3
define constants
tadjik1 b048983
export TokenBucket
tadjik1 adcdc4f
retry batching commands only on retryable errors
tadjik1 File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
Some generated files are not rendered by default. Learn more about how customized files appear on GitHub.
Oops, something went wrong.
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
| Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
@@ -87,6 +87,7 @@ export { | |||||
| MongoWriteConcernError, | ||||||
| WriteConcernErrorResult | ||||||
| } from './error'; | ||||||
| export { TokenBucket } from './token_bucket'; | ||||||
|
Contributor
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Suggested change
Not a strong opinion but if this isn't public API then it need not be exported (if we do change this can we move it below line 176) |
||||||
| export { | ||||||
| AbstractCursor, | ||||||
| // Actual driver classes exported | ||||||
|
|
||||||
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This will consequently transition the transaction into
TRANSACTION_IN_PROGRESSstate (as .empty has no error and no success labels).There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Do we have coverage for this through the spec tests or is there a bespoke node test to write for this?