Conversation
Signed-off-by: rajapandi1234 <138785181+rajapandi1234@users.noreply.github.com>
WalkthroughA new NOTICE file is added to document third-party libraries and their associated licenses. The file references license texts available in the license/ directory and enumerates components from Spring, MOSIP, Jackson, JUnit, Bouncy Castle, and other dependencies with their respective license designations. Changes
Estimated code review effort🎯 2 (Simple) | ⏱️ ~10 minutes Poem
Pre-merge checks and finishing touches✅ Passed checks (3 passed)
✨ Finishing touches🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. Comment |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Nitpick comments (2)
NOTICE (2)
1-35: Add guidance on completeness and maintenance.The NOTICE file provides good documentation of third-party libraries and their licenses. However, consider adding a note clarifying:
- Completeness: Is this list exhaustive (all direct + transitive dependencies), or does it cover only direct runtime dependencies?
- Maintenance: How should developers update this file when adding/upgrading dependencies? (e.g., "This file should be reviewed and updated whenever dependencies in
pom.xmlchange.")- License directory: Confirm that the referenced
license/directory exists and is populated with the full license texts for all listed components.🔎 Suggested addition (optional header/footer notes)
The full text of each license is available in the `license/` directory. + +Note: This file documents direct and significant transitive dependencies. +When updating dependencies, please review and update this NOTICE file accordingly.
17-17: Standardize dual/multi-license notation for consistency.The file uses inconsistent notation for dual or mixed licenses:
- Line 17 (JUnit):
1.0 / 2.0(version variants)- Line 23 (H2):
2.0 / 1.0(license variants with/)- Line 31 (Javassist):
(mixed)labelConsider standardizing the format. For example, use consistent separators and parenthetical notes:
-JUnit & JUnit Vintage — Eclipse Public License 1.0 / 2.0 +JUnit & JUnit Vintage — Eclipse Public License 1.0, 2.0This improves clarity and makes the file easier to parse programmatically if needed.
Also applies to: 23-23, 31-31
📜 Review details
Configuration used: Organization UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
NOTICE
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms. You can increase the timeout in your CodeRabbit configuration to a maximum of 15 minutes (900000ms). (1)
- GitHub Check: build-kernel / maven-build
🔇 Additional comments (1)
NOTICE (1)
7-33: LGTM — Good coverage and attribution.The library list appears comprehensive and license attributions are accurate for commonly-used OSS components. The file follows standard NOTICE conventions and will help maintain legal compliance and transparency.
Summary by CodeRabbit
✏️ Tip: You can customize this high-level summary in your review settings.