Backport 6893 for v6.x (buffer: improve creation performance)#7349
Closed
RReverser wants to merge 1 commit intonodejs:v6.xfrom
RReverser:buffer-slice-perf
Closed
Backport 6893 for v6.x (buffer: improve creation performance)#7349RReverser wants to merge 1 commit intonodejs:v6.xfrom RReverser:buffer-slice-perf
RReverser wants to merge 1 commit intonodejs:v6.xfrom
RReverser:buffer-slice-perf
Conversation
Improves performance of allocating unsafe buffers, creating buffers from an existing ArrayBuffer and creating .slice(...) from existing Buffer by avoiding deoptimizing change of prototype after Uint8Array allocation in favor of ES6 native subclassing. This is done through an internal ES6 class that extends Uint8Array and is used for allocations, but the regular Buffer function is exposed, so calling Buffer(...) with or without `new` continues to work as usual and prototype chains are also preserved. Performance wins for .slice are +120% (2.2x), and, consequently, for unsafe allocations up to +95% (1.9x) for small buffers, and for safe allocations (zero-filled) up to +30% (1.3x). PR-URL: #6893 Reviewed-By: Anna Henningsen <anna@addaleax.net> Reviewed-By: Сковорода Никита Андреевич <chalkerx@gmail.com>
nodejs-github-bot
added
buffer
Contributor
|
cc @nodejs/buffer |
Contributor
Contributor
|
LGTM |
Member
Author
|
Merging today if no objections. |
RReverser
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jun 25, 2016
Improves performance of allocating unsafe buffers, creating buffers from an existing ArrayBuffer and creating .slice(...) from existing Buffer by avoiding deoptimizing change of prototype after Uint8Array allocation in favor of ES6 native subclassing. This is done through an internal ES6 class that extends Uint8Array and is used for allocations, but the regular Buffer function is exposed, so calling Buffer(...) with or without `new` continues to work as usual and prototype chains are also preserved. Performance wins for .slice are +120% (2.2x), and, consequently, for unsafe allocations up to +95% (1.9x) for small buffers, and for safe allocations (zero-filled) up to +30% (1.3x). PR-URL: #7349 Ref: #6893 Reviewed-By: Anna Henningsen <anna@addaleax.net> Reviewed-By: Сковорода Никита Андреевич <chalkerx@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Trevor Norris <trev.norris@gmail.com>
Member
Author
|
Landed in ac8e1bf |
3 tasks
Merged
Merged
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
5 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Checklist
make -j4 test(UNIX) orvcbuild test nosign(Windows) passesAffected core subsystem(s)
buffer
Description of change
This is a backport of #6893 for v6.x as per @evanlucas' request. Applied almost cleanly.