feat: Support advanced search filters (time range, tags, type, importance) #209
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This PR implements advanced search filtering capabilities, addressing Issue #140.
🚀 Features
src/powermem/utils/filter_parser.pyto translate high-level API filters into storage-compatible queries.start_timeandend_timefilters (mapped tocreated_atrange queries).tagsfiltering (list or single value).typefilter to internalcategoryfield.importancethreshold filtering.PySeekDBVectorStore, enabling these features for the new backend.🛠 Implementation Details
start_timeinto operator-based queries (e.g.,{'': ...}) compatible with vector databases like Chroma/SeekDB.PySeekDBVectorStoreimplementation to utilize this parser in bothsearch()andlist()methods.✅ AI Contribution Details
SearchRequestmodel and identified that the service layer already supports passing filters, isolating the work to the storage/utility layer.Ready for review! 🔍