added different check ups for bustype #425
Open
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
paulapreuss
approved these changes
Jan 5, 2026
paulapreuss
left a comment
paulapreuss
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Great! I tested it and it seems to be working well now. Thanks for getting to the bottom of this 💪
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
It looks like first time connections did not get the correct color, because drawflow gives new nodes an extra wrap of a "data" array around data, which made the lookup bus.data.bustype result to null.
I added a little helper function, that just checks different ways that bustype could be stored.