Skip to content

Conversation

@stanpinteTheSignallingCompany
Copy link
Member

Dear Sylvain,

please find attached my first change proposal, following an internal review of the doc.

feel free to contact me to discuss any of these changes.

Very kind regards

Stan

@MERCEmentre
Copy link
Contributor

@sbaro @stanpinte Regarding Optional / Mandatory requirements, I agree with Sylvain: we should focus on minimal mandatory requirements, i.e. bullet 3/ in Sylvain's description.

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Maybe "understandable" should be replaced by "translatable", but the feature is useful to have. It is coherent to the response you made to David on the fact that if we use a DSL, it could be used to produce C, Ada, Matlab, Scade...

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I agree this is very useful, with "translatable". --> That forces the formal model to have open interfaces, so that it can be transformed to other formats.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants