Skip to content

Comments

OWNERS: add everettraven as reviewer/approver add ibihim as approver#842

Open
everettraven wants to merge 1 commit intoopenshift:masterfrom
everettraven:chore/update-owners
Open

OWNERS: add everettraven as reviewer/approver add ibihim as approver#842
everettraven wants to merge 1 commit intoopenshift:masterfrom
everettraven:chore/update-owners

Conversation

@everettraven
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

Signed-off-by: Bryce Palmer <bpalmer@redhat.com>
@coderabbitai
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Feb 17, 2026

No actionable comments were generated in the recent review. 🎉


Walkthrough

The change adds a new reviewer/approver (everettraven) to the OWNERS file, expanding the team with code review and approval permissions while maintaining existing reviewers and approvers.

Changes

Cohort / File(s) Summary
OWNERS configuration
OWNERS
Added everettraven to reviewers and approvers lists.

Estimated code review effort

🎯 1 (Trivial) | ⏱️ ~3 minutes

✨ Finishing touches
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
  • Create PR with unit tests
  • Post copyable unit tests in a comment

Tip

Issue Planner is now in beta. Read the docs and try it out! Share your feedback on Discord.


Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot requested review from ibihim and liouk February 17, 2026 19:48
@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Feb 17, 2026

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: everettraven
Once this PR has been reviewed and has the lgtm label, please assign liouk for approval. For more information see the Code Review Process.

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

Details Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Feb 17, 2026

@everettraven: The following tests failed, say /retest to rerun all failed tests or /retest-required to rerun all mandatory failed tests:

Test name Commit Details Required Rerun command
ci/prow/e2e-aws-operator-parallel-ote e7b629e link false /test e2e-aws-operator-parallel-ote
ci/prow/e2e-oidc e7b629e link true /test e2e-oidc
ci/prow/e2e-aws-operator-encryption-serial-ote-1of2 e7b629e link false /test e2e-aws-operator-encryption-serial-ote-1of2
ci/prow/e2e-operator e7b629e link true /test e2e-operator
ci/prow/e2e-aws-operator-encryption-perf-serial-ote-1of2 e7b629e link false /test e2e-aws-operator-encryption-perf-serial-ote-1of2
ci/prow/e2e-aws-operator-encryption-perf-serial-ote-2of2 e7b629e link false /test e2e-aws-operator-encryption-perf-serial-ote-2of2
ci/prow/e2e-aws-operator-encryption-rotation-serial-ote-1of2 e7b629e link false /test e2e-aws-operator-encryption-rotation-serial-ote-1of2
ci/prow/e2e-aws-operator-encryption-kms-serial-ote-2of2 e7b629e link false /test e2e-aws-operator-encryption-kms-serial-ote-2of2
ci/prow/e2e-console-login e7b629e link true /test e2e-console-login
ci/prow/e2e-aws-operator-encryption-serial-ote-2of2 e7b629e link false /test e2e-aws-operator-encryption-serial-ote-2of2
ci/prow/e2e-agnostic e7b629e link true /test e2e-agnostic
ci/prow/e2e-aws-operator-encryption-rotation-serial-ote-2of2 e7b629e link false /test e2e-aws-operator-encryption-rotation-serial-ote-2of2
ci/prow/e2e-aws-operator-serial-ote e7b629e link false /test e2e-aws-operator-serial-ote
ci/prow/e2e-aws-operator-encryption-kms-serial-ote-1of2 e7b629e link false /test e2e-aws-operator-encryption-kms-serial-ote-1of2
ci/prow/e2e-agnostic-upgrade e7b629e link true /test e2e-agnostic-upgrade

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard.

Details

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant