Skip to content

Comments

WIP: CNTRLPLANE-2699: adding network policies for operator and operands#645

Open
dusk125 wants to merge 1 commit intoopenshift:mainfrom
dusk125:network-policy
Open

WIP: CNTRLPLANE-2699: adding network policies for operator and operands#645
dusk125 wants to merge 1 commit intoopenshift:mainfrom
dusk125:network-policy

Conversation

@dusk125
Copy link

@dusk125 dusk125 commented Feb 5, 2026

Adds NetworkPolicy resources for both operator and operand namespaces:

  • Operator namespace (openshift-apiserver-operator): Default-deny with allow rules for DNS, API server access, and metrics ingress
  • Operand namespace (openshift-apiserver): Default-deny with allow rules for DNS, kube-apiserver access, etcd access (port 2379), and ingress on port 8443

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the jira/valid-reference Indicates that this PR references a valid Jira ticket of any type. label Feb 5, 2026
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

openshift-ci-robot commented Feb 5, 2026

@dusk125: This pull request references CNTRLPLANE-2699 which is a valid jira issue.

Warning: The referenced jira issue has an invalid target version for the target branch this PR targets: expected the story to target the "4.22.0" version, but no target version was set.

Details

In response to this:

Adds NetworkPolicy resources for both operator and operand namespaces:

  • Operator namespace (openshift-apiserver-operator): Default-deny with allow rules for DNS, API server access, and metrics ingress
  • Operand namespace (openshift-apiserver): Default-deny with allow rules for DNS, kube-apiserver access, etcd access (port 2379), and ingress on port 8443

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the do-not-merge/work-in-progress Indicates that a PR should not merge because it is a work in progress. label Feb 5, 2026
@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot requested review from benluddy and dgrisonnet February 5, 2026 18:50
@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Feb 5, 2026

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: dusk125
Once this PR has been reviewed and has the lgtm label, please assign benluddy for approval. For more information see the Code Review Process.

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

Details Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Feb 5, 2026

@dusk125: The following test failed, say /retest to rerun all failed tests or /retest-required to rerun all mandatory failed tests:

Test name Commit Details Required Rerun command
ci/prow/e2e-aws-ovn 29983f6 link true /test e2e-aws-ovn

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard.

Details

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

do-not-merge/work-in-progress Indicates that a PR should not merge because it is a work in progress. jira/valid-reference Indicates that this PR references a valid Jira ticket of any type.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants