Skip to content

Comments

Revert "OCPBUGS-76286: openshift-enterprise-base: remove subscription-manager, dbus, systemd"#222

Open
sdodson wants to merge 1 commit intomasterfrom
revert-221-OCPBUGS-76286
Open

Revert "OCPBUGS-76286: openshift-enterprise-base: remove subscription-manager, dbus, systemd"#222
sdodson wants to merge 1 commit intomasterfrom
revert-221-OCPBUGS-76286

Conversation

@sdodson
Copy link
Member

@sdodson sdodson commented Feb 20, 2026

Reverts #221

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added jira/valid-reference Indicates that this PR references a valid Jira ticket of any type. jira/invalid-bug Indicates that a referenced Jira bug is invalid for the branch this PR is targeting. labels Feb 20, 2026
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

@sdodson: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-76286, which is invalid:

  • expected the bug to be in one of the following states: NEW, ASSIGNED, POST, but it is MODIFIED instead

Comment /jira refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Jira bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

The bug has been updated to refer to the pull request using the external bug tracker.

Details

In response to this:

Reverts #221

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

@sdodson
Copy link
Member Author

sdodson commented Feb 20, 2026

/hold
Unhold just if this is necessary

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. label Feb 20, 2026
@sdodson sdodson added jira/valid-bug Indicates that a referenced Jira bug is valid for the branch this PR is targeting. and removed do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. jira/invalid-bug Indicates that a referenced Jira bug is invalid for the branch this PR is targeting. labels Feb 20, 2026
@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot requested review from csrwng and sjenning February 20, 2026 18:30
@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Feb 20, 2026

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: sdodson

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Details Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Feb 20, 2026
@sdodson sdodson added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Feb 20, 2026
@sdodson
Copy link
Member Author

sdodson commented Feb 20, 2026

/verified by CI

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the verified Signifies that the PR passed pre-merge verification criteria label Feb 20, 2026
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

@sdodson: This PR has been marked as verified by CI.

Details

In response to this:

/verified by CI

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

@sdodson sdodson added the acknowledge-critical-fixes-only Indicates if the issuer of the label is OK with the policy. label Feb 20, 2026
@sdodson
Copy link
Member Author

sdodson commented Feb 20, 2026

/tide refresh

@sdodson
Copy link
Member Author

sdodson commented Feb 20, 2026

/override ci/prow/e2e-aws ci/prow/e2e-aws-upgrade ci/prow/e2e-metal-ipi-ovn-ipv6
These jobs aren't smart enough to rebuild everything anyway so don't worry about it

@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Feb 20, 2026

@sdodson: Overrode contexts on behalf of sdodson: ci/prow/e2e-aws, ci/prow/e2e-aws-upgrade, ci/prow/e2e-metal-ipi-ovn-ipv6

Details

In response to this:

/override ci/prow/e2e-aws ci/prow/e2e-aws-upgrade ci/prow/e2e-metal-ipi-ovn-ipv6
These jobs aren't smart enough to rebuild everything anyway so don't worry about it

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

@sdodson
Copy link
Member Author

sdodson commented Feb 20, 2026

/close

@sdodson
Copy link
Member Author

sdodson commented Feb 20, 2026

/hold

@sdodson sdodson closed this Feb 20, 2026
@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. label Feb 20, 2026
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

@sdodson: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-76286. The bug has been updated to no longer refer to the pull request using the external bug tracker.

Details

In response to this:

Reverts #221

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Feb 20, 2026

@sdodson: Closed this PR.

Details

In response to this:

/close

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

@sdodson
Copy link
Member Author

sdodson commented Feb 20, 2026

Sigh, i hadn't realized that when clicking around I had cleared the hold.

@sdodson sdodson reopened this Feb 20, 2026
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

@sdodson: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-76286, which is invalid:

  • expected the bug to be in one of the following states: NEW, ASSIGNED, POST, but it is MODIFIED instead

Comment /jira refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Jira bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

The bug has been updated to refer to the pull request using the external bug tracker.

Retaining the jira/valid-bug label as it was manually added.

Details

In response to this:

Reverts #221

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

@sdodson sdodson closed this Feb 20, 2026
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

@sdodson: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-76286. The bug has been updated to no longer refer to the pull request using the external bug tracker.

Details

In response to this:

Reverts #221

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

@sdodson sdodson reopened this Feb 20, 2026
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

@sdodson: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-76286, which is invalid:

  • expected the bug to be in one of the following states: NEW, ASSIGNED, POST, but it is MODIFIED instead

Comment /jira refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Jira bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

The bug has been updated to refer to the pull request using the external bug tracker.

Retaining the jira/valid-bug label as it was manually added.

Details

In response to this:

Reverts #221

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

@sdodson
Copy link
Member Author

sdodson commented Feb 20, 2026

/override ci/prow/e2e-aws ci/prow/e2e-aws-upgrade ci/prow/e2e-metal-ipi-ovn-ipv6

@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Feb 20, 2026

@sdodson: Overrode contexts on behalf of sdodson: ci/prow/e2e-aws, ci/prow/e2e-aws-upgrade, ci/prow/e2e-metal-ipi-ovn-ipv6

Details

In response to this:

/override ci/prow/e2e-aws ci/prow/e2e-aws-upgrade ci/prow/e2e-metal-ipi-ovn-ipv6

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Feb 20, 2026

@sdodson: all tests passed!

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard.

Details

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

acknowledge-critical-fixes-only Indicates if the issuer of the label is OK with the policy. approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. jira/valid-bug Indicates that a referenced Jira bug is valid for the branch this PR is targeting. jira/valid-reference Indicates that this PR references a valid Jira ticket of any type. lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. verified Signifies that the PR passed pre-merge verification criteria

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants