Kuttl test to cover an edge deployment scenario#495
Kuttl test to cover an edge deployment scenario#495fmount wants to merge 1 commit intoopenstack-k8s-operators:mainfrom
Conversation
|
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: fmount The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. The pull request process is described here DetailsNeeds approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
|
The failure is expected until #494 lands. |
|
For the same reason, kuttl is failing and it should pass after rebasing on top of #494 |
6c44626 to
82d7669
Compare
This patch introduces a kuttl test that is supposed to cover an Edge use case deployment. It asserts that the required resources exist and the Pods are available. This change also updates the Edge sample to make sure it reflects the right type. Signed-off-by: Francesco Pantano <fpantano@redhat.com>
efdf1aa to
c54d3e7
Compare
| default: | ||
| customServiceConfig: | | ||
| [DEFAULT] | ||
| enabled_backends=default_backend:rbd,az1:rbd,az2:rbd |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I have to review the samples config because this is not going to work w/o a ceph Pod deployed by in the kuttl context
|
/retest |
|
@fmount: The following tests failed, say
Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard. DetailsInstructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. I understand the commands that are listed here. |
This patch introduces a kuttl test that is supposed to cover an
Edgeuse case deployment. Itassertsthat the required resources exist and thePodsare available. This change also updates theEdgesample to make sure it reflects the righttype.