Skip to content

Conversation

@lu-yg
Copy link
Collaborator

@lu-yg lu-yg commented Jun 6, 2025

English | 简体中文

PR

PR Checklist

Please check if your PR fulfills the following requirements:

  • The commit message follows our Commit Message Guidelines
  • Tests for the changes have been added (for bug fixes / features)
  • Docs have been added / updated (for bug fixes / features)
  • Built its own designer, fully self-validated

PR Type

What kind of change does this PR introduce?

  • Bugfix
  • Feature
  • Code style update (formatting, local variables)
  • Refactoring (no functional changes, no api changes)
  • Build related changes
  • CI related changes
  • Documentation content changes
  • Other... Please describe:

Background and solution

What is the current behavior?

Issue Number: N/A

What is the new behavior?

Does this PR introduce a breaking change?

  • Yes
  • No

Other information

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features
    • Stricter file type and content validation for uploaded files, including checks for valid JSON format and correct file extensions/types in component and internationalization upload endpoints.
  • Bug Fixes
    • Improved test consistency by ensuring mocked file inputs use valid JSON content.
  • Chores
    • Added new file type and extension options for enhanced validation.
    • Removed redundant file type checks in component service to streamline processing.

@coderabbitai
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Jun 6, 2025

Walkthrough

Two new enums for file types and file extensions were added. File type and content validation logic was introduced or strengthened in several controllers and service methods, particularly for JSON files. A utility method for validating JSON file content was implemented, and related test cases were updated to use valid JSON input. Additionally, a file type check method was simplified by changing its parameter to accept multiple allowed MIME types per extension. Some redundant file checks were removed from service implementations.

Changes

File(s) Change Summary
.../enums/Enums.java Added FileType and FileNameEnd enums for common file types and extensions.
.../utils/SecurityFileCheckUtil.java Modified checkFileType to accept Map<String, List<String>>; added isValidJson(MultipartFile file).
.../controller/ComponentController.java Added file type and JSON content validation in upload methods before service calls.
.../controller/I18nEntryController.java Added stricter file extension/type checks for uploaded files in i18n endpoints.
.../service/app/impl/I18nEntryServiceImpl.java Added JSON content validation calls in file processing methods.
.../service/material/impl/ComponentServiceImpl.java Removed redundant file type check method and its invocation in bundleSplit.
.../test/java/com/tinyengine/it/service/app/impl/I18nEntryServiceImplTest.java Updated test mocks to use valid JSON strings in relevant test methods.
.../test/java/com/tinyengine/it/controller/I18nEntryControllerTest.java Enhanced mocks for MultipartFile to include content type, filename, and JSON content.

Sequence Diagram(s)

sequenceDiagram
    participant User
    participant Controller
    participant SecurityFileCheckUtil
    participant Service

    User->>Controller: Upload file (e.g., JSON)
    Controller->>SecurityFileCheckUtil: checkFileType(file, allowedTypes)
    Controller->>SecurityFileCheckUtil: isValidJson(file)
    SecurityFileCheckUtil-->>Controller: Validation result / Exception
    Controller->>Service: Process validated file
    Service->>SecurityFileCheckUtil: isValidJson(file) (if not already checked)
    SecurityFileCheckUtil-->>Service: Validation result / Exception
    Service-->>Controller: Process result
    Controller-->>User: Response
Loading

Poem

In the warren of code, new enums appear,
For files and their types, the intent is clear.
JSONs are checked, no imposters allowed,
Controllers and services feeling quite proud.
With tests now in order, the rabbits all cheer—
Secure uploads are here, let’s hop without fear!
🐇✨


📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 2c3ca8e and 6d678ae.

📒 Files selected for processing (5)
  • base/src/main/java/com/tinyengine/it/common/enums/Enums.java (1 hunks)
  • base/src/main/java/com/tinyengine/it/common/utils/SecurityFileCheckUtil.java (3 hunks)
  • base/src/main/java/com/tinyengine/it/controller/I18nEntryController.java (4 hunks)
  • base/src/main/java/com/tinyengine/it/service/material/impl/ComponentServiceImpl.java (0 hunks)
  • base/src/test/java/com/tinyengine/it/controller/I18nEntryControllerTest.java (4 hunks)
💤 Files with no reviewable changes (1)
  • base/src/main/java/com/tinyengine/it/service/material/impl/ComponentServiceImpl.java
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (3)
  • base/src/main/java/com/tinyengine/it/common/enums/Enums.java
  • base/src/main/java/com/tinyengine/it/controller/I18nEntryController.java
  • base/src/main/java/com/tinyengine/it/common/utils/SecurityFileCheckUtil.java
🔇 Additional comments (3)
base/src/test/java/com/tinyengine/it/controller/I18nEntryControllerTest.java (3)

20-20: Import additions look appropriate.

The new imports for IoUtil and StandardCharsets are correctly added to support the enhanced file mocking functionality.

Also applies to: 40-40


137-141: Enhanced file mocking improves test realism.

The additional mocking of MultipartFile properties creates more realistic test scenarios that align with the new file validation logic. The JSON content and file metadata are consistent and well-structured.


155-159: Consistent mocking implementation across test methods.

The file mocking in testUpdateI18nMultiFile is identical to the single file test, ensuring consistency in test data setup.

✨ Finishing Touches
  • 📝 Generate Docstrings

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Explain this complex logic.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai explain this code block.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and explain its main purpose.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Support

Need help? Create a ticket on our support page for assistance with any issues or questions.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate sequence diagram to generate a sequence diagram of the changes in this PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 2

🧹 Nitpick comments (2)
base/src/main/java/com/tinyengine/it/common/enums/Enums.java (1)

957-1000: Consider JPG extension consistency.

The FileNameEnd.JPG uses ".jpeg" extension while the typical extension is ".jpg". Both are valid, but ensure this aligns with your application's file naming conventions.

Otherwise, the enum is well-structured and provides a clean way to manage file extension constants.

base/src/main/java/com/tinyengine/it/common/utils/SecurityFileCheckUtil.java (1)

182-190: Consider input stream consumption implications.

The JSON validation method is well-implemented, but consider that file.getInputStream() consumes the stream. Ensure downstream code doesn't need to read the stream again, or consider using file.getBytes() instead.

Alternative implementation to avoid stream consumption:

 public static void isValidJson(MultipartFile file) {
     ObjectMapper objectMapper = new ObjectMapper();
     try {
-        objectMapper.readTree(file.getInputStream());
+        objectMapper.readTree(file.getBytes());
     } catch (IOException e) {
         throw new ServiceException(ExceptionEnum.CM308.getResultCode(), ExceptionEnum.CM308.getResultMsg());
     }
 }

The current implementation is acceptable if stream reuse isn't required.

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between b28105d and 16da533.

📒 Files selected for processing (6)
  • base/src/main/java/com/tinyengine/it/common/enums/Enums.java (1 hunks)
  • base/src/main/java/com/tinyengine/it/common/utils/SecurityFileCheckUtil.java (2 hunks)
  • base/src/main/java/com/tinyengine/it/controller/ComponentController.java (3 hunks)
  • base/src/main/java/com/tinyengine/it/controller/I18nEntryController.java (4 hunks)
  • base/src/main/java/com/tinyengine/it/service/app/impl/I18nEntryServiceImpl.java (3 hunks)
  • base/src/test/java/com/tinyengine/it/service/app/impl/I18nEntryServiceImplTest.java (2 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🧬 Code Graph Analysis (3)
base/src/main/java/com/tinyengine/it/controller/ComponentController.java (2)
base/src/main/java/com/tinyengine/it/common/enums/Enums.java (1)
  • Enums (20-1001)
base/src/main/java/com/tinyengine/it/common/utils/SecurityFileCheckUtil.java (1)
  • SecurityFileCheckUtil (33-192)
base/src/main/java/com/tinyengine/it/controller/I18nEntryController.java (2)
base/src/main/java/com/tinyengine/it/common/enums/Enums.java (1)
  • Enums (20-1001)
base/src/main/java/com/tinyengine/it/common/utils/SecurityFileCheckUtil.java (1)
  • SecurityFileCheckUtil (33-192)
base/src/main/java/com/tinyengine/it/service/app/impl/I18nEntryServiceImpl.java (2)
base/src/main/java/com/tinyengine/it/common/utils/SecurityFileCheckUtil.java (1)
  • SecurityFileCheckUtil (33-192)
base/src/main/java/com/tinyengine/it/common/enums/Enums.java (1)
  • Enums (20-1001)
🔇 Additional comments (11)
base/src/main/java/com/tinyengine/it/common/enums/Enums.java (1)

912-955: LGTM! Well-structured enum for file MIME types.

The FileType enum provides a clean, centralized way to manage MIME type constants for file validation. All MIME types are standard and correctly defined.

base/src/test/java/com/tinyengine/it/service/app/impl/I18nEntryServiceImplTest.java (2)

287-287: Good alignment of test data with JSON validation.

Updating the mocked input stream to match the JSON content returned by getBytes() ensures consistency and supports the new JSON validation logic.


302-302: Consistent test data alignment.

Good consistency in updating test data to support JSON validation across multiple test methods.

base/src/main/java/com/tinyengine/it/controller/ComponentController.java (1)

16-16: Appropriate import for enum usage.

The import addition supports the new file type validation logic using the centralized enums.

base/src/main/java/com/tinyengine/it/common/utils/SecurityFileCheckUtil.java (1)

15-15: Appropriate imports for JSON validation.

The Jackson ObjectMapper and IOException imports correctly support the new JSON validation functionality.

Also applies to: 22-22

base/src/main/java/com/tinyengine/it/service/app/impl/I18nEntryServiceImpl.java (3)

24-24: LGTM: Import added for security validation

The import for SecurityFileCheckUtil is correctly added to support the new JSON validation functionality.


330-331: Good: Enhanced JSON file validation with correct enum usage

The changes improve security by:

  1. Correcting the enum usage from MimeType to FileType (line 330)
  2. Adding JSON content validation before processing (line 331)

The SecurityFileCheckUtil.isValidJson(file) call ensures the uploaded JSON file has valid content structure, which prevents processing malformed JSON that could cause runtime errors.


362-362: Consistent JSON validation implementation

The JSON validation is appropriately placed at the beginning of the method before any file processing occurs, ensuring early validation and consistent error handling across the codebase.

base/src/main/java/com/tinyengine/it/controller/I18nEntryController.java (3)

16-16: LGTM: Necessary imports for enhanced file validation

The imports for Enums and HashMap are correctly added to support the new file type validation functionality.

Also applies to: 50-50


253-257: Robust file type validation implementation

The implementation creates a comprehensive validation approach by:

  1. Mapping file extensions to their MIME types using the new enums
  2. Validating both filename and content type through SecurityFileCheckUtil.checkFileType

This provides defense-in-depth by checking both the file extension and the actual MIME type, preventing potential security issues from file type spoofing.


294-294: Consistent JSON-specific validation

The direct validation for JSON files using SecurityFileCheckUtil.checkFileType with specific JSON parameters maintains consistency with the validation approach while being optimized for the single file type expected in this method.

@hexqi hexqi merged commit e0904a5 into opentiny:develop Jun 9, 2025
1 check passed
lu-yg added a commit to lu-yg/tiny-engine-backend-java that referenced this pull request Oct 23, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants