-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 36
Fix Docker 29.x compatibility issues with Traefik - v1.4.2 #817
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
base: v2.13+summer2025
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Fix Docker 29.x compatibility issues with Traefik - v1.4.2 #817
Conversation
Summary of ChangesHello @rquidute, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed! This pull request provides a comprehensive solution to address critical compatibility issues arising from Docker 29.x versions causing Traefik proxy failures. It introduces automated Docker version management across fresh installations and update flows, ensuring that the system always runs with a compatible Docker version. Additionally, it provides dedicated scripts for manual intervention and workaround scenarios, enhancing the overall stability and reliability of the environment. Highlights
Using Gemini Code AssistThe full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips. Invoking Gemini You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either
Customization To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a Limitations & Feedback Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here. You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension. Footnotes
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Code Review
This pull request introduces a robust solution to address compatibility issues with Docker 29.x by automatically downgrading to a compatible 28.x version during installation and updates. The changes include new scripts for the compatibility fix and integrate them into the existing installation and update flows.
My review focuses on ensuring the new scripts are robust and consistent. I've identified a potential issue in 1-install-dependencies.sh where not all Docker-related packages are 'held', which could lead to unintended upgrades and re-introduce the compatibility problem. I've also suggested a minor improvement to a log message in fix-docker-compatibility.sh for better clarity. Overall, the changes are well-structured and effectively address the reported issue.
Co-authored-by: gemini-code-assist[bot] <176961590+gemini-code-assist[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: gemini-code-assist[bot] <176961590+gemini-code-assist[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
What Changed
Fixes Docker 29.x compatibility issues that cause Traefik proxy failures with "client version 1.24 is too old" errors. Implements automatic Docker version management to prevent compatibility issues during installation and updates.
Changes
Fresh Installation Flow Updates:
Update Flow Integration:
New Docker Fix Scripts (Workaround):
Related Issue
#812
Testing
The following scenarios were covered in this PR:
./scripts/fix-docker-workaround.shto workaround the issueworkaround_docker_traefik_issue_v_1_4_2branch version and issue was not thereworkaround_docker_traefik_issue_v_1_4_2branch and issue was not thereDO NOT MERGE SINCE IT'S STILL WAITING FOR THE CCB