Open
Conversation
The package repository has been archived by the author in favour of `rehype-mermaid`. Signed-off-by: Ugo Baroncini <ugobaroncini@gmail.com>
|
Hi! It seems some of the things asked in the template are missing? Please edit your post to fill out everything.
You won’t get any more notifications from me, but I’ll keep on updating this comment, and remove it when done! If you need it, here’s the original template<!--
Please check the needed checkboxes ([ ] -> [x]).
Leave the comments as they are: they do not show on GitHub.
Please try to limit the scope,
provide a general description of the changes,
and remember it’s up to you to convince us to land it.
We are excited about pull requests.
Thank you!
-->
### Initial checklist
* [ ] I read the support docs <!-- https://github.com/remarkjs/.github/blob/main/support.md -->
* [ ] I read the contributing guide <!-- https://github.com/remarkjs/.github/blob/main/contributing.md -->
* [ ] I agree to follow the code of conduct <!-- https://github.com/remarkjs/.github/blob/main/code-of-conduct.md -->
* [ ] I searched issues and discussions and couldn’t find anything or linked relevant results below <!-- https://github.com/search?q=user%3Aremarkjs&type=issues and https://github.com/orgs/remarkjs/discussions -->
* [ ] I made sure the docs are up to date
* [ ] I included tests (or that’s not needed)
### Description of changes
TODO
<!--do not edit: pr-->
Thanks, |
Codecov ReportAll modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #1439 +/- ##
=========================================
Coverage 100.00% 100.00%
=========================================
Files 6 6
Lines 138 138
=========================================
Hits 138 138 ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. 🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
|
JounQin
approved these changes
Apr 16, 2025
remcohaszing
requested changes
Apr 16, 2025
Member
remcohaszing
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The plugin is deprecated, not broken. I suggest we remove it from the list instead.
Member
|
if it is no longer suggested for use, then it is better to remove it from the list of suggestions. So 👍 to Remco’s suggestion. @pastacolsugo, can you instead remove it? |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
The package repository has been archived by the author in favour of
rehype-mermaid.Initial checklist
Description of changes
Changed plugin status in the list