Skip to content

Unit test generated by RoostGPT #150

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open
Divyeshzb wants to merge 1 commit into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from
Open

Unit test generated by RoostGPT #150

Show file tree
Hide file tree
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
1 commit
Select commit
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
166 changes: 88 additions & 78 deletions pom.xml
View file
Open in desktop
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
@@ -1,89 +1,99 @@
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<project xmlns="http://maven.apache.org/POM/4.0.0" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"
xsi:schemaLocation="http://maven.apache.org/POM/4.0.0 https://maven.apache.org/xsd/maven-4.0.0.xsd">
<modelVersion>4.0.0</modelVersion>
<parent>
<groupId>org.springframework.boot</groupId>
<artifactId>spring-boot-starter-parent</artifactId>
<version>3.0.5</version>
<relativePath/> <!-- lookup parent from repository -->
</parent>
<groupId>com.bootexample4</groupId>
<artifactId>products</artifactId>
<version>0.0.1-SNAPSHOT</version>
<name>products</name>
<description>Demo project for Spring Boot</description>
<properties>
<java.version>17</java.version>
</properties>
<dependencies>
<dependency>
<groupId>org.springframework.boot</groupId>
<artifactId>spring-boot-starter-data-jpa</artifactId>
</dependency>
<!-- mockserver -->
<dependency>
<groupId>org.mock-server</groupId>
<artifactId>mockserver-netty</artifactId>
<version>3.10.8</version>
</dependency>
<dependency>
<groupId>org.mock-server</groupId>
<artifactId>mockserver-client-java</artifactId>
<version>3.10.8</version>
</dependency>
<dependency>
<groupId>org.springframework.boot</groupId>
<artifactId>spring-boot-starter-web</artifactId>
</dependency>

<dependency>
<groupId>com.h2database</groupId>
<artifactId>h2</artifactId>
<scope>runtime</scope>
</dependency>
<dependency>
<groupId>org.springframework.boot</groupId>
<artifactId>spring-boot-starter-test</artifactId>
<scope>test</scope>
</dependency>
<!-- Cucumber Spring Boot Starter -->
<?xml version="1.0"?>
<project xmlns="http://maven.apache.org/POM/4.0.0" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://maven.apache.org/POM/4.0.0 https://maven.apache.org/xsd/maven-4.0.0.xsd">
<modelVersion>4.0.0</modelVersion>
<parent>
<groupId>org.springframework.boot</groupId>
<artifactId>spring-boot-starter-parent</artifactId>
<version>3.0.5</version>
<relativePath/>
<!-- lookup parent from repository -->
</parent>
<groupId>com.bootexample4</groupId>
<artifactId>products</artifactId>
<version>0.0.1-SNAPSHOT</version>
<name>products</name>
<description>Demo project for Spring Boot</description>
<properties>
<java.version>17</java.version>
</properties>
<dependencies>
<dependency>
<groupId>io.cucumber</groupId>
<artifactId>cucumber-spring</artifactId>
<version>7.0.0</version>
<scope>test</scope>
<groupId>org.springframework.boot</groupId>
<artifactId>spring-boot-starter-data-jpa</artifactId>
</dependency>
<!-- mockserver -->
<dependency>
<groupId>org.mock-server</groupId>
<artifactId>mockserver-netty</artifactId>
<version>3.10.8</version>
</dependency>
<dependency>
<groupId>org.mock-server</groupId>
<artifactId>mockserver-client-java</artifactId>
<version>3.10.8</version>
</dependency>
<dependency>
<groupId>org.springframework.boot</groupId>
<artifactId>spring-boot-starter-web</artifactId>
</dependency>
<dependency>
<groupId>com.h2database</groupId>
<artifactId>h2</artifactId>
<scope>runtime</scope>
</dependency>
<dependency>
<groupId>org.springframework.boot</groupId>
<artifactId>spring-boot-starter-test</artifactId>
<scope>test</scope>
</dependency>
<!-- Cucumber Spring Boot Starter -->
<dependency>
<groupId>io.cucumber</groupId>
<artifactId>cucumber-spring</artifactId>
<version>7.0.0</version>
<scope>test</scope>
</dependency>
<!-- Cucumber Java -->
<dependency>
<groupId>io.cucumber</groupId>
<artifactId>cucumber-java</artifactId>
<version>7.0.0</version>
<scope>test</scope>
<groupId>io.cucumber</groupId>
<artifactId>cucumber-java</artifactId>
<version>7.0.0</version>
<scope>test</scope>
</dependency>
<!-- Cucumber JUnit -->
<dependency>
<groupId>io.cucumber</groupId>
<artifactId>cucumber-junit</artifactId>
<version>7.0.0</version>
<scope>test</scope>
<groupId>io.cucumber</groupId>
<artifactId>cucumber-junit</artifactId>
<version>7.0.0</version>
<scope>test</scope>
</dependency>
<!-- AssertJ -->
<dependency>
<groupId>org.assertj</groupId>
<artifactId>assertj-core</artifactId>
<version>3.19.0</version>
<scope>test</scope>
<groupId>org.assertj</groupId>
<artifactId>assertj-core</artifactId>
<version>3.19.0</version>
<scope>test</scope>
</dependency>
<dependency>
<groupId>org.junit.jupiter</groupId>
<artifactId>junit-jupiter-engine</artifactId>
<version>5.7.2</version>
<scope>test</scope>
<!--Dependency added by RoostGPT-->
</dependency>
<dependency>
<groupId>org.junit.vintage</groupId>
<artifactId>junit-vintage-engine</artifactId>
<version>5.2.0</version>
<!--Dependency added by RoostGPT-->
</dependency>
</dependencies>

<build>
<plugins>
<plugin>
<groupId>org.springframework.boot</groupId>
<artifactId>spring-boot-maven-plugin</artifactId>
</plugin>
</plugins>
</build>

</project>
</dependencies>
<build>
<plugins>
<plugin>
<groupId>org.springframework.boot</groupId>
<artifactId>spring-boot-maven-plugin</artifactId>
</plugin>
</plugins>
</build>
</project>
114 changes: 114 additions & 0 deletions src/test/java/com/bootexample4/products/controller/ProductControllerCreateProductTest.java
View file
Open in desktop
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
@@ -0,0 +1,114 @@
// ********RoostGPT********
/*
Test generated by RoostGPT for test java-sample-test using AI Type Azure Open AI and AI Model roostgpt-4-32k

ROOST_METHOD_HASH=createProduct_16b670a647
ROOST_METHOD_SIG_HASH=createProduct_36b748883e

================================VULNERABILITIES================================
Vulnerability: CWE-915: Improperly Controlled Modification of Dynamically-Determined Object Attributes
Issue: The createProduct method doesn't validate or sanitize the product information before saving it to the database, which could lead to various types of attacks, such as SQL Injection or Cross-Site Scripting.
Solution: Implement input validation to ensure that only valid product data can be saved to the database. Furthermore, any text that will be displayed to users should be properly sanitized to prevent HTML or JavaScript injection.

Vulnerability: CWE-352: Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF)
Issue: The controller lacks CSRF protection. An attacker may trick a logged-in user into making an unintended request to your web application which will be treated as legitimate.
Solution: Include CSRF tokens in each state-changing request to ensure that they originate from the correct location. In Spring, you can enable CSRF protection by adding '<csrf/>' inside the '<http>' element in your Spring Security configuration.

Vulnerability: CWE-306: Missing Authentication for Critical Function
Issue: The method createProduct doesn't have any authentication. If your application doesn't require authentication or if the controller doesn't enforce it, unauthenticated users may be able to create product records.
Solution: Use Spring Security or a similar library to protect sensitive endpoints. Make sure that only authenticated and authorized users can create product records.

================================================================================
Scenario 1: Test Create Product using Valid Data

Details:
TestName: testCreateProductWithValidData().
Description: This test is meant to check if a product is created and stored in the repository successfully when valid product data is provided.
Execution:
Arrange: Create a mock product object and a product repository. Mock the save method of the product repository to return the product object.
Act: Call the createProduct method with the mock product as the parameter.
Assert: Verify that the return value from the method is equal to the mock product.
Validation:
We are trying to ensure that the method works correctly when the data is valid. The save method of the product repository should be called and the resulting product should match the mock product which confirms successful creation and saving of the product.

Scenario 2: Test Create Product with Null or Invalid Data

Details:
TestName: testCreateProductWithNullData().
Description: This is meant to test how the method handles incorrect input data. In this scenario, we will use null as the input for the product.
Execution:
Arrange: Mock the product repository, but no product object needs to be created.
Act: Call the createProduct method with null as the parameter.
Assert: Expect an exception to be thrown, which can be verified using the JUnit assertThrows method.
Validation:
This test aims to validate how the method deals with error scenarios, namely providing null data. Since null is not valid data for the creation of a product, the method should fail, and the test verifies this by expecting an exception to be thrown.

Scenario 3: Test Create Product with Product Missing Required Fields

Details:
TestName: testCreateProductWithMissingRequiredFields().
Description: This test will check how the method behaves when a product object with missing fields is provided.
Execution:
Arrange: Create a mock product object with missing required fields and a product repository. Mock the save method of the product repository to throw a DataIntegrityViolationException.
Act: Call the createProduct method with the mock product as a parameter.
Assert: Expect a DataIntegrityViolationException to be thrown, which can be verified using the JUnit assertThrows method.
Validation:
In a scenario where the product object does not have all the required fields, the method should fail due to the violation of the integrity constraints. Therefore, the test validates this by asserting that a DataIntegrityViolationException is thrown.
*/

// ********RoostGPT********
package com.bootexample4.products.controller;

import com.bootexample4.products.model.Product;
import com.bootexample4.products.repository.ProductRepository;
import org.junit.jupiter.api.Test;
import org.mockito.InjectMocks;
import org.mockito.Mock;
import org.springframework.boot.test.context.SpringBootTest;
import org.springframework.dao.DataIntegrityViolationException;

import static org.junit.jupiter.api.Assertions.assertEquals;
import static org.junit.jupiter.api.Assertions.assertThrows;
import static org.mockito.ArgumentMatchers.any;
import static org.mockito.Mockito.when;

@SpringBootTest
public class ProductControllerCreateProductTest {

@InjectMocks
ProductController productController;

@Mock
ProductRepository productRepository;


@Test
public void testCreateProductWithValidData() {
Product testProduct = new Product();
testProduct.setName("Test Product");
testProduct.setDescription("Test Product Description");
testProduct.setPrice(100.0);

when(productRepository.save(any(Product.class))).thenReturn(testProduct);

Product createdProduct = productController.createProduct(testProduct);

assertEquals(testProduct, createdProduct, "The product should be created successfully");
}

@Test
public void testCreateProductWithNullData() {
Product testProduct = null;

assertThrows(IllegalArgumentException.class, () -> productController.createProduct(testProduct), "The method should throw an IllegalArgumentException when the product data is null");
}

@Test
public void testCreateProductWithMissingRequiredFields() {
Product testProduct = new Product();

when(productRepository.save(any(Product.class))).thenThrow(new DataIntegrityViolationException("Missing required fields"));

assertThrows(DataIntegrityViolationException.class, () -> productController.createProduct(testProduct), "The method should throw a DataIntegrityViolationException when the product data is missing required fields");
}
}
63 changes: 63 additions & 0 deletions src/test/java/com/bootexample4/products/controller/ProductControllerDeleteProductTest.java
View file
Open in desktop
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
@@ -0,0 +1,63 @@
// ********RoostGPT********
/*
Test generated by RoostGPT for test java-sample-test using AI Type Azure Open AI and AI Model roostgpt-4-32k

ROOST_METHOD_HASH=deleteProduct_5ea3a876a4
ROOST_METHOD_SIG_HASH=deleteProduct_dcaff736d4

================================VULNERABILITIES================================
Vulnerability: Potential SQL Injection
Issue: If the findById() function of the ProductRepository is implemented wrongly, it can potentially lead to SQL injection.
Solution: Use prepared statements, or parameterized queries, to ensure the id parameter straightly can't be used to perform a SQL injection attack.

Vulnerability: Unnecessary Information Disclosure
Issue: Returning ResponseEntity.notFound().build() discloses that the id provided did not exist in the database.
Solution: Instead of providing explicit information about whether an id was found, return a generic 'Request Processed' message. This will prevent potential attackers from enumerating valid ids.

Vulnerability: Unsafe Object Deletion
Issue: An unauthenticated user may delete objects by guessing id values.
Solution: Implement appropriate authentication and authorization checks before allowing an object deletion operation. This usually implies checking user roles and permissions.

Vulnerability: System Dependencies
Issue: The code relies heavily on the Spring framework. If there are vulnerabilities within the version of Spring that you are using, your system could be at risk.
Solution: Regularly update to the latest version of Spring to ensure that any security patches are adopted. Actively monitor Spring's security advisories.

================================================================================
Scenario 1: Test for successful product deletion

Details:
TestName: testSuccessfulProductDeletion.
Description: This test checks the successful deletion of an existing product item, as matched by its ID.
Execution:
Arrange: Create a mock product and inject it as the return value when productRepository.findById() is called.
Act: Invoke deleteProduct(), passing the mock product's id as the parameter.
Assert: Check that the returned ResponseEntity's status is OK.
Validation:
This verifies that the productRepository.delete() method is working correctly and that the product has been successfully removed. This is crucial for ensuring data integrity and that obsolete products are properly deleted from the database.

Scenario 2: Test for product deletion with non-existent id

Details:
TestName: testProductDeletionWithInvalidId.
Description: This test validates the behavior of deleteProduct() when it is invoked with id parameter pointing to a non-existent product.
Execution:
Arrange: Ensure that no product matches the target id to be passed as the parameter to deleteProduct().
Act: Call deleteProduct(), using the invalid id.
Assert: Check that the returned ResponseEntity's status is 'not found' (404).
Validation:
This checks that the system properly handles attempts at deleting a product that does not exist. It is to prevent system errors or unwanted behavior, ensuring the system is resilient.

Scenario 3: Test for null input to product deletion

Details:
TestName: testNullInputToProductDeletion.
Description: This test is meant to check the system's reaction to null input. For deleteProduct(), the method should not process if the id parameter is null.
Execution:
Arrange: No special preparatory steps needed as we will pass null as the input.
Act: Execute deleteProduct(), passing null as the id parameter.
Assert: Expect an exception to be thrown, since null is an invalid parameter.
Validation:
This checks the system's robustness in handling null input, which will help to prevent null pointer exceptions and promote system stability.
*/

// ********RoostGPT********
Loading