Rebarified

[nisbus]

Hi,

This is a minor change, basically just rebarifying erlog so it can be used as a rebar dependency.

Added rebar.config, rebar and erlog.app.src for enabling others to use erlog as a rebar dependency.
Changed the Makefile to use rebar.

[rvirding]

I will pull this later. It is good you attacked Makefile, the old one was pretty bad. I would like to make it so it uses rebar if it can find rebar, else uses erlc. The lfe Makefile does this but there is probably a better way to do it.

[nisbus]

I think the convention is to include rebar with the repo (I'm not so sure I
like that myself) so it is a part of the branch there so it will always
find it.

On Sun, Feb 17, 2013 at 4:07 PM, Robert Virding notifications@github.comwrote:

I will pull this later. It is good you attacked Makefile, the old one was
pretty bad. I would like to make it so it uses rebar if it can find rebar,
else uses erlc. The lfe Makefile does this but there is probably a better
way to do it.

—
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHubhttps://github.com//pull/2#issuecomment-13688104.

[rvirding]

Looking back over old stuff and saw this. The reason why I never pulled it was because it didn't have the option of using either rebar or normal make if there was no rebar. I don't see rebar as the answer. :-)

[zkessin]

My branch has a makefile that handles both cases, so maybe we should just close this PR?