feat:add support to store multiple commands in NFC card

[ignasiduelo]

This adds support to store multiple commands in NFC card in text feld separated by line breaks, allowing things like storing a room change in a card and then playing an album from a particular track, such as:

room:Den
spotify:playlist:5B8etHA3kzgOZ5Pdz2FAVe
command:trackseek/2

[ryanolf]

Hi @ignasiduelo, thanks for the PR! I think this feature sounds reasonable, but I'm not sure it adds much over what you can already do, which is have each command in its own record. Each card can have multiple records. What lead you to do this instead of using multiple records?

[ignasiduelo]

Ah you're totally right.
I was using another tool that only read the first text record, so I went this route. But yep, you're right it makes no sense.

[ryanolf]

I think making cards compatible between different implementations is compelling. I’d rather you not have to reprogram your cards. I don’t really see a downside to parsing each line as a command. I’ll take a look when I’m back on my computer.

…

On Fri, Nov 8, 2024 at 5:12 PM Ignasi Duelo ***@***.***> wrote: Closed #18 <#18>. — Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub <#18 (comment)>, or unsubscribe <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AAJSBSSF2W6D3NFH6JFKY4DZ7TWGHAVCNFSM6AAAAABRNRLFV6VHI2DSMVQWIX3LMV45UABCJFZXG5LFIV3GK3TUJZXXI2LGNFRWC5DJN5XDWMJVGIZDANRWGU2TKNA> . You are receiving this because you commented.Message ID: ***@***.***>

[ryanolf]

What is the other tool that works this way? I wonder if there are other commands or differences we want to consider.

…

On Fri, Nov 8, 2024 at 6:53 PM Ryan Olf ***@***.***> wrote: I think making cards compatible between different implementations is compelling. I’d rather you not have to reprogram your cards. I don’t really see a downside to parsing each line as a command. I’ll take a look when I’m back on my computer. On Fri, Nov 8, 2024 at 5:12 PM Ignasi Duelo ***@***.***> wrote: > Closed #18 <#18>. > > — > Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub > <#18 (comment)>, > or unsubscribe > <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AAJSBSSF2W6D3NFH6JFKY4DZ7TWGHAVCNFSM6AAAAABRNRLFV6VHI2DSMVQWIX3LMV45UABCJFZXG5LFIV3GK3TUJZXXI2LGNFRWC5DJN5XDWMJVGIZDANRWGU2TKNA> > . > You are receiving this because you commented.Message ID: > ***@***.***> >

[ryanolf]

If you can fix the one redundant call, this seems fine to merge.

[ryanolf]

I think this call is redundant (in the case of a single line) and an error (in the event of multiple lines.