Skip to content

Conversation

@wendyyang
Copy link
Contributor

@wendyyang wendyyang commented Jan 27, 2026

Closes #5479

Changes proposed in this pull request

  • remove retention instruction validation

Instructions for Reviewers

[All PRs] - Confirm PR template filled
[Feature Branches] - Review code
[Production Merges to main]
    - Check story numbers included
    - Check for debug code
    - Check version

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Jan 27, 2026

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 87.34%. Comparing base (181fa9f) to head (3ff6ea0).

Additional details and impacted files
@@             Coverage Diff             @@
##           develop    #5502      +/-   ##
===========================================
- Coverage    87.40%   87.34%   -0.06%     
===========================================
  Files         1457     1457              
  Lines        32705    32693      -12     
  Branches      3423     3418       -5     
===========================================
- Hits         28586    28556      -30     
- Misses        4104     4122      +18     
  Partials        15       15              

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
  • 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Y26-019 - Different retention instructions for different tubes in same manifest

3 participants