Rewrite What Is Scorecard page for simulation platform positioning#103
Rewrite What Is Scorecard page for simulation platform positioning#103
Conversation
…ioning Replaces "AI evaluation platform" framing with "simulation platform for agent self-improvement" per updated positioning. Rewrites the full page with new problem framing, 4-step simulation workflow, use-case cards, integration section, and updated CTAs. Also updates overview.mdx description, opening paragraph, and card copy for consistency.
Summary of ChangesHello @Rutledge, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed! This pull request rebrands Scorecard's core messaging across key introductory documentation pages. The primary goal is to shift the product's identity from an "AI evaluation platform" to a "simulation platform for AI agent self-improvement," emphasizing its role in accelerating agent development through large-scale simulation and automated feedback. These changes aim to provide a clearer, more impactful narrative for users engaging with the platform's capabilities. Highlights
🧠 New Feature in Public Preview: You can now enable Memory to help Gemini Code Assist learn from your team's feedback. This makes future code reviews more consistent and personalized to your project's style. Click here to enable Memory in your admin console. Changelog
Activity
Using Gemini Code AssistThe full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips. Invoking Gemini You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either
Customization To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a Limitations & Feedback Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here. You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension. Footnotes
|
🖼️ Image Usage Check ✅All 236 images in the repository are being used! No unused images found. Great job keeping the repository clean! 🎉 |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Code Review
This pull request is a comprehensive rewrite of the 'What Is Scorecard?' page to align with the new 'simulation platform' positioning, along with corresponding updates to the 'Overview' page. The changes are well-executed and effectively communicate the new messaging. I've provided a couple of minor suggestions to improve clarity and consistency in the documentation.
- Use "tens of" / "tens of thousands of" instead of "10s" / "10,000s" - Add trailing newline to overview.mdx - Fix broken link in faq.mdx: /features/ab-comparison → /features/a-b-comparison
Cut "What you can do" (duplicates the Steps content) and fold "Built by simulation engineers" into the Get started section as a brief intro line.
Use "beaker" (valid Lucide icon) instead of "flask" to match overview page.
Summary
intro/what-is-scorecard.mdxto align with the new "simulation platform for agent self-improvement" positioning, replacing the old "AI evaluation platform" identityintro/overview.mdxdescription, opening paragraph, card copy, and footer to match the new messagingTest plan
npx mintlify devand verify both pages render correctly<Steps>,<CardGroup>,<Card>,<Tip>, and<Frame>components render properlynpx mintlify broken-links— no new broken links introduced)