Skip to content

Conversation

@Ocheretovich
Copy link

@Ocheretovich Ocheretovich commented Dec 28, 2025

This PR includes two small, independent cleanups:

  • Remove an outdated TODO comment in version resolution logic
  • Make the proof roundtrip test robust when testdata is missing

No functional changes.

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Chores

    • Removed obsolete comments from internal utilities.
  • Tests

    • Updated test configuration to conditionally skip tests when required test data is unavailable.

✏️ Tip: You can customize this high-level summary in your review settings.

@coderabbitai
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Dec 28, 2025

📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

Removed a two-line TODO comment from a coordinator version utility and marked two test_roundtrip tests in the zkp crate with #[ignore = "..."], causing them to be skipped when testdata is not present; no production APIs changed.

Changes

Cohort / File(s) Summary
Comment cleanup
coordinator/internal/utils/version.go
Removed a two-line TODO comment above Version; no code, logic, or behavior changes.
Test annotations
crates/libzkp/src/proofs.rs
Added #[ignore = "requires testdata directory with chunk-proof.json, batch-proof.json, bundle-proof.json"] to two test_roundtrip test functions to skip them when testdata is unavailable; only test behavior changed.

Estimated code review effort

🎯 2 (Simple) | ⏱️ ~10 minutes

Poem

A rabbit nibbles at a TODO leaf,
Two tests now nap when testdata’s brief,
Quiet changes, no public shout,
Codepad tidy, hop about. 🐇✨

Pre-merge checks and finishing touches

❌ Failed checks (1 warning)
Check name Status Explanation Resolution
Description check ⚠️ Warning The description lacks required sections from the template, including checkboxes for PR type (feat/fix/chore/etc), deployment tag versioning, and breaking change label. Add the PR type checkbox selection, deployment tag versioning checkbox, and breaking change label checkbox as specified in the template.
✅ Passed checks (2 passed)
Check name Status Explanation
Title check ✅ Passed The title accurately reflects both main changes: removing an outdated TODO comment and stabilizing the proof roundtrip test by adding ignore conditions.
Docstring Coverage ✅ Passed Docstring coverage is 100.00% which is sufficient. The required threshold is 80.00%.
✨ Finishing touches
  • 📝 Generate docstrings

📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: defaults

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 408389d and 19d814a.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • crates/libzkp/src/proofs.rs
🔇 Additional comments (1)
crates/libzkp/src/proofs.rs (1)

223-223: Good solution to address the silent skip concern.

The #[ignore] attribute makes the test skip explicit and documents the required testdata files. This directly addresses the past review comment about silent test skips hiding coverage gaps.

Note that ignored tests don't run by default—if roundtrip coverage is important, ensure your CI is configured to run ignored tests with cargo test -- --ignored or cargo test -- --include-ignored.


Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

📜 Review details

Configuration used: defaults

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between e88ba1c and 408389d.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • crates/libzkp/src/proofs.rs

@Ocheretovich Ocheretovich changed the title chore: remove outdated TODO comment in version resolution chore: remove outdated TODO and stabilize proof roundtrip test Dec 28, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant