Skip to content

Conversation

@akashsonune
Copy link
Member

BREAKING CHANGE: The property SiFormItemControl.errormessageId is now required. All implementations of SiFormItemControl must provide this property to ensure proper accessibility support for error messages.

Describe in detail what your merge request does and why. Add relevant
screenshots and reference related issues via Closes #XY or Related to #XY.


BREAKING CHANGE: The property `SiFormItemControl.errormessageId` is now required. All implementations of `SiFormItemControl` must provide this property to ensure proper accessibility support for error messages.
@akashsonune akashsonune requested review from a team and chintankavathia as code owners January 23, 2026 08:25
@gemini-code-assist
Copy link

Summary of Changes

Hello @akashsonune, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!

This pull request introduces a breaking change by making the errormessageId property mandatory within the SiFormItemControl interface. This change is designed to significantly enhance accessibility by guaranteeing that all form item controls consistently provide an identifier for their associated error messages, which is vital for assistive technologies like screen readers.

Highlights

  • Interface Modification: The errormessageId property in the SiFormItemControl interface has been changed from optional to required, ensuring all implementations provide this crucial accessibility identifier.
  • Directive Implementation: The SiFormlyFormFieldProviderDirective now explicitly implements the errormessageId property, dynamically computing its value based on the field's ID to maintain consistency.
Using Gemini Code Assist

The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.

Invoking Gemini

You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands on the current page.

Feature Command Description
Code Review /gemini review Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state.
Pull Request Summary /gemini summary Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state.
Comment @gemini-code-assist Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in pull request comments and review comments.
Help /gemini help Displays a list of available commands.

Customization

To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.

Limitations & Feedback

Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here.

You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.

Footnotes

  1. Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution.

@akashsonune akashsonune added the breaking-changes Marks issues and PRs that are breaking the API label Jan 23, 2026
@akashsonune akashsonune added this to the 49.0.0 milestone Jan 23, 2026
* This property will be required with v48.
*/
readonly errormessageId?: string | Signal<string | undefined>;
readonly errormessageId: string | Signal<string | undefined>;
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Suggested change
readonly errormessageId: string | Signal<string | undefined>;
readonly errormessageId: string | Signal<string>;

I hope this works as well

Copy link

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Code Review

This pull request makes the errormessageId property on the SiFormItemControl interface required, which is a breaking change. This is a good step towards improving accessibility for form error messages. The change is correctly implemented in SiFormlyFormFieldProviderDirective to satisfy the new interface requirement. However, I've noted an issue with the implementation in SiFormlyFormFieldProviderDirective where it doesn't fully adhere to the contract of SiFormItemControl regarding the assignment of aria-describedby, which is crucial for accessibility. Please see my detailed comment.

readonly field = input.required<FormlyFieldConfig>();

readonly id = computed(() => this.field().id);
readonly errormessageId = computed(() => `${this.field().id}-errormessage`);

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

high

While adding errormessageId is correct to satisfy the updated SiFormItemControl interface, this implementation doesn't fully adhere to the contract defined in the interface's documentation.

The documentation for SiFormItemControl states:

Implementations of {@link SiFormItemControl} must generate this ID and assign it to the aria-describedby attribute of their focusable elements.

This directive only generates the ID. It does not assign it to the aria-describedby attribute of the focusable formly field. This means the accessibility link between the field and its error message is not created for formly fields, which is a significant accessibility issue.

To resolve this, the errormessageId should be propagated to the underlying formly field component, which can then apply it to the aria-describedby attribute. A robust way to do this with signal-based inputs is to use an effect in this directive's constructor to update the field's properties:

import { effect } from '@angular/core';
// ...
constructor() {
  effect(() => {
    const field = this.field();
    field.props ??= {};
    field.props['aria-describedby'] = this.errormessageId();
  });
}

This would require adding a constructor to the directive. The underlying formly field components would also need to be updated to read this property and apply it.

@github-actions
Copy link

Code Coverage

@github-actions
Copy link

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

breaking-changes Marks issues and PRs that are breaking the API

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants