feat: add runtime type checking #50
Conversation
|
The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎
|
|
Important Review skippedDraft detected. Please check the settings in the CodeRabbit UI or the You can disable this status message by setting the WalkthroughThe pull request introduces several updates across multiple files, primarily focusing on improving TypeScript configurations, simplifying function signatures, and enhancing query handling. Key changes include adjustments to the Changes
Possibly related PRs
Poem
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 20
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (39)
packages/queries/src/types/Cardinality.ts (2)
12-12: LGTM: Cardinality type definition is correct. Consider updating the comment.The new
Cardinalitytype definition correctly usesStatic<typeof CardinalitySchema>, ensuring consistency between the runtime schema and the TypeScript type. This approach is more maintainable as it automatically reflects any changes made to the schema.Consider updating the comment above the type definition to reflect the new implementation:
/** * The cardinality of a query. + * Derived from CardinalitySchema for runtime type checking. */
1-12: Summary: Excellent implementation of runtime type checking for Cardinality.The changes in this file successfully introduce runtime type checking for the
Cardinalitytype using the@sinclair/typeboxlibrary. The implementation includes:
- A well-defined
CardinalitySchemausingt.Unionandt.Literal.- A
Cardinalitytype derived from the schema usingStatic<typeof CardinalitySchema>.These changes align perfectly with the PR objective of adding runtime type checking. They enhance type safety and validation in the SynthQL project, particularly for the cardinality feature. The use of
@sinclair/typeboxprovides a robust and maintainable solution for runtime validation.As you continue to implement runtime type checking across the project, consider the following:
- Consistency: Ensure that this pattern is followed consistently for other types that require runtime validation.
- Performance: Be mindful of the performance impact of runtime type checking, especially in performance-critical paths.
- Error Handling: Implement proper error handling for cases where runtime type checks fail.
- Testing: Add unit tests to verify that the runtime type checking behaves as expected.
packages/queries/src/types/AnyQuery.ts (1)
Line range hint
1-18: Ensure comprehensive documentation and testing for the new type systemGiven the significant changes to the type system and the introduction of runtime type checking:
- Update the project documentation to reflect these changes, explaining the new type system and its benefits.
- Provide examples of how to use the new
AnyTableandAnyQuerytypes in the context of runtime type checking.- Implement comprehensive tests to ensure that the runtime type checking correctly validates data types and catches potential errors.
- Consider updating the blog post at https://synthql.dev/blog/rfc-runtime-validation to include concrete examples of how these changes improve the SynthQL framework.
These steps will help ensure a smooth transition to the new type system and provide clarity for users of the SynthQL framework.
packages/queries/src/col.ts (3)
Line range hint
9-11: Consider using more specific types instead ofanyThe use of
as anytype assertions in the function may hinder type safety. Consider using more specific types or leveraging TypeScript's type inference capabilities to maintain better type safety throughout the codebase.Here's a suggested refactoring to improve type safety:
type TableName = string; type ColumnName = string; interface RefObject { table: TableName; column: ColumnName; } export function col<DB>(ref: ColumnReference<DB>): RefOp<DB> { const parts = ref.split('.'); if (parts.length === 2) { return { $ref: { table: parts[0] as TableName, column: parts[1] as ColumnName, }, }; } if (parts.length === 3) { return { $ref: { table: `${parts[0]}.${parts[1]}` as TableName, column: parts[2] as ColumnName, }, }; } throw new Error(`Invalid column reference: ${ref}`); }This approach introduces more specific types and reduces the use of
any, improving type safety while maintaining the function's logic.Also applies to: 17-19
Line range hint
22-22: Enhance error message with expected formatThe current error message for invalid column references could be more informative by including the expected format.
Consider updating the error message to provide more context:
throw new Error(`Invalid column reference: ${ref}. Expected format: "table.column" or "schema.table.column"`);This change would make it easier for developers to understand and correct invalid inputs.
Action Required: Assess Impact of Removing
opProperty onisRefOp.ts
packages/queries/src/validators/isRefOp.tsuses theop.$refproperty, which may be affected by the removal ofop: '='incol.ts.🔗 Analysis chain
Line range hint
4-24: Verify the impact of removingop: '='propertyThe removal of the
op: '='property from the$refobject simplifies its structure. This change might be related to the introduction of runtime type checking mentioned in the PR objectives.Please ensure that this change doesn't break any existing functionality that might depend on the presence of the
opproperty. Also, confirm that this aligns with the runtime type checking implementation described in the referenced blog post (https://synthql.dev/blog/rfc-runtime-validation).🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for usages of the 'op' property in $ref objects rg --type typescript '$ref.*op'Length of output: 68
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for usages of the 'op' property in $ref objects within TypeScript files rg --type ts '\$ref\..*op'Length of output: 142
packages/queries/src/validators/validateNestedQueriesHaveAValidRefOp.ts (1)
Line range hint
11-24: LGTM: Function logic remains valid, minor improvement suggestedThe function's internal logic remains unchanged and appears to be compatible with the new
Omit<AnyQuery, 'schema'>type. It correctly accesses the 'include' and 'where' properties, which should be present in the new type.For improved clarity and type safety, consider adding a type assertion or using optional chaining for the 'include' property:
const nestedQueries = Object.values(query.include ?? {});This change ensures that even if 'include' is undefined, the function will still work as expected.
packages/queries/src/types/Where.ts (1)
6-6: LGTM: WhereSchema correctly implements runtime type checking.The new
WhereSchemaexport correctly implements a runtime type checking schema for theWheretype, aligning with the PR objective. It usest.Recordto define a record type with string keys andWhereClauseSchemavalues, which accurately represents the structure of theWheretype.Consider adding a brief comment above the
WhereSchemaexport to explain its purpose and relationship to theWheretype. This would enhance code readability and maintainability. For example:// Runtime type checking schema for the Where type export const WhereSchema = t.Record(t.String(), WhereClauseSchema);packages/react/src/synthqlQueryKey.ts (2)
17-20: LGTM! Consider adding a brief comment explaining the type parameter change.The simplification of the
synthqlQueryKeyfunction signature by removingDBandTTabletype parameters aligns well with the PR objective of adding runtime type checking. This change maintains backwards compatibility while potentially making the function more flexible and easier to use.Consider adding a brief comment above the function to explain the rationale behind removing the
DBandTTabletype parameters. This would help future maintainers understand the design decision.+// TQuery extends Query without DB and TTable for simplified runtime type checking export function synthqlQueryKey<TQuery extends Query>( query: TQuery, opts?: SynthqlQueryOptions, ): SynthqlQueryKey<TQuery> {
28-30: Great improvement! Consider adding a comment for clarity.The addition of the type predicate
key is SynthqlQueryKeyin theisSynthqlQueryKeyfunction signature is an excellent improvement. It enhances type safety by allowing TypeScript to narrow the type ofkeywhen the function returns true, which aligns perfectly with the PR objective of adding runtime type checking.For improved clarity, consider adding a brief comment explaining the purpose of the type predicate:
+// Type predicate to narrow the type of 'key' to SynthqlQueryKey when the function returns true export function isSynthqlQueryKey( key: QueryKey | SynthqlQueryKey, ): key is SynthqlQueryKey {packages/queries/src/QueryBuilderError.ts (1)
4-10: Remove redundant assignment and approve constructor changes.The constructor changes look good overall, aligning with the PR objective of adding runtime type checking. However, there's a minor optimization we can make:
- The explicit assignment
this.type = type;on line 9 is redundant, astypeis already declared as a public parameter in the constructor.Consider removing the redundant assignment:
constructor( public type: string, public message: string, ) { super(message); - this.type = type; Error.captureStackTrace(this, QueryBuilderError); }packages/queries/package.json (2)
29-29: LGTM! Consider refining the watch pattern.The new
build:watchscript is a good addition for development workflow, allowing automatic rebuilds on file changes.Consider refining the watch pattern to be more specific to this package:
-"build:watch": "nodemon -x \"yarn typecheck && yarn build\" -e \"ts\" -w \"packages/**/*\"", +"build:watch": "nodemon -x \"yarn typecheck && yarn build\" -e \"ts\" -w \"src/**/*\"",This change would make the script watch only the
srcdirectory of the current package, potentially reducing unnecessary rebuilds.
33-34: LGTM! Consider the performance impact of runtime type checking.The addition of
@sinclair/typeboxaligns well with the PR objective of implementing runtime type checking.Note that as a production dependency, this will increase the bundle size and may have a performance impact at runtime. Ensure that the benefits of runtime type checking outweigh any potential performance costs in your use case.
packages/backend/src/tests/e2e/payments.test.ts (1)
Line range hint
20-20: Consider addressing the skipped test.The test is currently skipped due to a TODO comment about fixing the payment_date format. To ensure comprehensive validation of the runtime type checking changes:
- Consider prioritizing the resolution of the payment_date format issue.
- Once resolved, remove the
.skipto enable the test.Would you like assistance in addressing the payment_date format issue or creating a GitHub issue to track this task?
packages/react/src/useSynthqlExamples.test.tsx (1)
Line range hint
53-53: Consider increasing the test timeout.The current test timeout is set to 1000ms (1 second). While this might be sufficient in most cases, it could lead to flaky tests in slower environments or when the network is congested. Consider increasing the timeout to a more generous value, such as 5000ms (5 seconds), to reduce the likelihood of false negatives due to timeout issues.
You can increase the timeout by modifying the last line of the test:
- }, 1000); + }, 5000);packages/queries/src/types/ColumnValue.ts (3)
1-13: LGTM! Consider adding a type annotation forPrimitiveSchema.The import and definition of
PrimitiveSchemalook good. It covers a comprehensive range of primitive types, which is excellent for type checking.Consider adding a type annotation to
PrimitiveSchemafor improved readability:-const PrimitiveSchema = t.Union([ +const PrimitiveSchema: t.TUnion<t.TSchema[]> = t.Union([ t.String(), t.Number(), t.Boolean(), t.Null(), t.Undefined(), t.BigInt(), t.Date(), ]);
15-18: LGTM! Consider adding a type annotation forColumnValueSchema.The definition and export of
ColumnValueSchemalook good. It appropriately allows for both primitive values and arrays of primitive values, which should cover most column value scenarios.Consider adding a type annotation to
ColumnValueSchemafor improved readability:-export const ColumnValueSchema = t.Union([ +export const ColumnValueSchema: t.TUnion<t.TSchema[]> = t.Union([ PrimitiveSchema, t.Array(PrimitiveSchema), ]);
Line range hint
20-65: Consider integrating new schemas with existing type definitions.While the new
PrimitiveSchemaandColumnValueSchemaprovide excellent runtime type checking, they are not integrated with the existingColumnValueandColumnTypetype definitions. This might lead to inconsistencies between runtime and compile-time type checking.Consider refactoring the
ColumnValueandColumnTypetypes to use the new schemas. Here's a suggestion:
- Define a TypeScript type that corresponds to
ColumnValueSchema:type ColumnValueType = t.Static<typeof ColumnValueSchema>;
- Use this type in the
ColumnValueandColumnTypedefinitions:export type ColumnValue< DB, TTable extends Table<DB>, TColumn extends Column<DB, TTable>, > = DB[TTable] extends { columns: infer TColumnDef } ? ColumnType<TColumnDef, TColumn> : never; export type ColumnType<TColumnDef, TColumn extends keyof TColumnDef> = // Case 1: Check if nullable is false TColumnDef[TColumn] extends { type: infer TNotNullableType; nullable: false; } ? TNotNullableType & ColumnValueType : // Case 2: Check if nullable is boolean TColumnDef[TColumn] extends { type: infer TNullableType; nullable: boolean; } ? (TNullableType & ColumnValueType) | null : // Case 3: Return never if nullable is not boolean never;This integration ensures consistency between runtime and compile-time type checking.
packages/backend/src/tests/propertyBased/properties/cardinalityMaybe.test.ts (2)
Line range hint
1-7: Consider grouping imports for better organization.While the change in import order doesn't affect functionality, it's generally a good practice to group imports by their source. Consider reorganizing the imports as follows:
- Third-party imports (e.g., '@fast-check/vitest', '@synthql/queries', 'vitest')
- Local imports (e.g., '../../generated', '../../queryEngine', etc.)
This organization improves readability and makes it easier to distinguish between external dependencies and local modules.
Line range hint
31-31: Consider using a more specific type instead ofas any.The use of
as anyin the type assertion bypasses TypeScript's type checking, which can lead to potential runtime errors. This doesn't align well with the PR's objective of adding runtime type checking.Consider using a more specific type for
result. If the exact type is unknown, you could useunknowninstead ofany, which would require explicit type checking before use:const result: unknown = queryResult;This approach maintains type safety while allowing for runtime type checking, which aligns better with the PR's objectives.
packages/queries/src/util/hashQuery.ts (2)
3-8: Update function comment to reflect new signatureThe comment above the
hashQueryfunction is now outdated. It should be updated to reflect the changes in the function signature and explain why 'hash' and 'schema' are omitted.Consider updating the comment as follows:
/** * Hashes a query into a stable hash string. * This function excludes 'hash' and 'schema' properties from the input query. * @param query - The query object to hash, excluding 'hash' and 'schema' properties * @returns A stable hash string representation of the query */
Line range hint
28-72: Consider reviewing unchanged helper functionsWhile not directly related to the changes in this PR, there are a few points to consider about the helper functions:
The comments indicate that some functions are copied from external sources. Ensure that proper attribution and licensing are in place for these borrowed implementations.
The
djb2Hashfunction, while simple and fast, is not cryptographically secure and may have a higher collision rate compared to more modern hash functions. If the hash is used for security-sensitive purposes or if collision resistance is crucial, consider using a more robust hashing algorithm.If you decide to change the hashing algorithm, ensure that it doesn't break existing functionality or stored hashes. You might want to consider a gradual migration strategy if a change is necessary.
packages/backend/src/tests/propertyBased/properties/cardinalityOne.test.ts (1)
Line range hint
1-62: Summary of changes and potential impactThe changes in this file primarily involve simplifying type assertions for
typedQueryand removing the unusedQueryimport. These modifications appear to be part of a broader effort to streamline type handling in the codebase.While the changes look good and should lead to cleaner code, it's crucial to ensure that:
- Type inference is working correctly throughout this file.
- These changes don't negatively impact type checking in the broader codebase.
- The runtime behavior of the tests remains unchanged.
Consider running a comprehensive type check across the entire project to verify that these changes haven't introduced any type-related issues elsewhere. Additionally, ensure that all tests still pass after these modifications.
packages/backend/src/execution/executors/QueryProviderExecutor/convertWhereToQueryProviderInput.test.ts (1)
Line range hint
1-68: Overall assessment: Changes align with PR objectivesThe modifications in this file, specifically the removal of type parameters from
convertWhereToQueryProviderInputfunction calls, are consistent with the PR objective of adding runtime type checking. These changes simplify the test code and improve readability while maintaining the overall structure and logic of the tests.As you continue to implement runtime type checking:
- Ensure that runtime checks are comprehensive and cover all edge cases.
- Consider adding performance benchmarks to measure any potential impact of runtime type checking on execution time.
- Update documentation to reflect the new runtime type checking behavior, especially if it changes how developers should use the
convertWhereToQueryProviderInputfunction.packages/backend/src/execution/executors/PgExecutor/queryBuilder/createAugmentedQuery.ts (1)
3-4: Consider reverting the import statement reordering.The reordering of import statements for
ColumnRefandTableRefdoesn't seem to follow any specific pattern or convention. Unless there's a particular reason for this change, it might be better to revert it to reduce noise in the diff and maintain consistency with the rest of the codebase.packages/introspect/src/e2e.test.ts (1)
1-1: Approved: Import statement reorganizationMoving the 'prettier' import to the top of the file improves code organization. However, this change doesn't seem directly related to the PR's objective of adding runtime type checking.
Consider grouping all imports together for consistency, unless there's a specific reason to keep 'prettier' separate.
packages/backend/src/tests/benchmarks/bench.test.ts (1)
Line range hint
1-89: Consider addressing the PR objectiveWhile the import reorganization improves code quality, this file doesn't directly address the PR objective of adding runtime type checking. Consider the following suggestions:
- If runtime type checking is relevant to these benchmark tests, update the tests to include scenarios that validate the new type checking functionality.
- If this file doesn't require changes for runtime type checking, ensure that other files in the PR implement the feature as described in the referenced blog post (https://synthql.dev/blog/rfc-runtime-validation).
packages/backend/src/tests/propertyBased/arbitraries/ArbitraryQueryBuilder.ts (1)
Line range hint
1-158: Summary: Good progress on runtime type checking implementationOverall, the changes in this file are consistent with the PR's objective of adding runtime type checking to the SynthQL project. The modifications primarily involve:
- Changing return types to more generic versions (e.g.,
Query['select']instead ofSelect<DB, TTable>).- Adding a
schemaproperty withAny()type in thebuildmethod.These changes enhance type flexibility and lay the groundwork for runtime type checking. However, there are a couple of points to consider for future improvements:
- The use of
Any()for theschemaproperty might be too permissive. Consider implementing more specific runtime type checks for the schema in the future.- The
arbWheremethod currently returns an empty object. It might be beneficial to implement more complex where conditions in the future to test a wider range of scenarios.As you continue to develop this feature, consider the following:
- Implement more specific runtime type checks for different properties of the
Queryobject.- Develop a strategy for handling potential runtime type errors that may occur during query execution.
- Create comprehensive tests to ensure that the runtime type checking behaves as expected across various scenarios.
packages/cli/src/e2e.test.ts (1)
1-5: LGTM, but consider adopting a consistent import ordering strategy.The reordering of imports doesn't affect the functionality, but it's generally a good practice to have a consistent import order throughout the project. Consider adopting a specific strategy (e.g., alphabetical, grouped by source type) and applying it across all files.
packages/backend/src/QueryEngine.ts (1)
Line range hint
1-194: Consider adding explicit runtime type checks.While the type-related modifications align with the PR objective of adding runtime type checking, I noticed that no explicit runtime type checks have been added to the method implementations. To fully achieve the PR objective, consider adding runtime type validations within the methods, especially in
executeandcompile.For example, you could add checks like:
if (!isValidQuery(query)) { throw new SynthqlError('Invalid query structure'); }This would enhance the robustness of the code and catch type-related issues at runtime.
packages/queries/src/query.test.ts (1)
165-196: LGTM: New test case for complex query structure.This new test case is a valuable addition as it verifies the behavior of complex queries involving multiple includes (store, address, and staff). It enhances the test coverage for more intricate query scenarios.
Consider adding a descriptive name for this test case to improve readability and make its purpose clear. For example:
test('Complex query: Store with address and staff', () => { // ... (existing test code) });packages/backend/src/query/iterateQuery.test.ts (2)
197-197: LGTM! Consider expanding schema tests.The addition of the
schemaproperty to the test case is a good start for incorporating runtime type checking. It aligns well with the PR objective.To further improve test coverage:
- Consider adding test cases with non-empty schema objects to validate different schema configurations.
- Include tests that specifically target the runtime type checking functionality once implemented.
Example of a more comprehensive test case:
{ input: { from: 'film', select: { title: true, release_year: true }, where: { film_id: 1 }, schema: { title: { type: 'string', maxLength: 255 }, release_year: { type: 'number', minimum: 1900, maximum: 2100 } } }, expected: [ { query: { from: 'film', select: { title: true, release_year: true }, where: { film_id: 1 }, schema: { title: { type: 'string', maxLength: 255 }, release_year: { type: 'number', minimum: 1900, maximum: 2100 } } }, insertionPath: [], }, ], }This will ensure that the
iterateQueryfunction correctly handles and propagates schema information.Also applies to: 205-205
Line range hint
1-218: Overall assessment: Good progress, consider expanding testsThe changes in this file successfully introduce the
schemaproperty to the test suite, which is a crucial step towards implementing runtime type checking. The modifications are minimal yet impactful, maintaining the integrity of existing tests while paving the way for more comprehensive schema validation.To further strengthen the implementation of runtime type checking:
- Gradually introduce more complex schema definitions in the test cases to cover various scenarios.
- Consider adding specific tests for schema validation once the runtime type checking functionality is fully implemented.
- Ensure that all existing query types and structures are covered with appropriate schema definitions in the test suite.
These steps will help ensure robust testing of the new runtime type checking feature across different query scenarios.
packages/backend/src/execution/execute.test.ts (1)
Line range hint
220-280: Summary: Consistent removal of explicit type parameters fromexecutecallsThe changes in this file consistently remove explicit type parameters from all
executefunction calls. This modification aligns with the PR objective of adding runtime type checking and simplifies the code by relying more on TypeScript's type inference capabilities.While these changes are positive, they necessitate careful verification of type inference to maintain type safety. Consider the following recommendations:
- Thoroughly test the modified
executecalls with various query structures to ensure type inference works correctly in all scenarios.- Consider adding a few strategic type assertions in complex cases to serve as both verification and documentation of expected types.
- If not already in place, implement comprehensive unit tests that cover edge cases and complex query structures to catch any potential type-related issues early.
- Document the reliance on type inference in the project's contribution guidelines or relevant documentation to ensure future contributors are aware of this approach.
These steps will help maintain the benefits of the simplified code while ensuring robust type safety throughout the project.
packages/react/src/useSynthql.test.tsx (1)
331-333: LGTM: Nested data test cases updated correctly with a suggestion.All test cases for fetching nested data have been properly updated to use the new
renderSynthqlQuerysignature. The changes are consistent and maintain the existing test coverage while adapting to the new implementation. The use of thereturnLastOnlyoption in some cases is noteworthy.Suggestion: Consider adding a comment explaining the significance of the
returnLastOnlyoption in the test cases where it's used. This would improve the test suite's documentation and help other developers understand when and why this option should be used.Also applies to: 399-402, 483-486, 581-584
packages/queries/src/schema/getTableSchema.ts (1)
54-54: Enhance error message with unsupported type informationIncluding the actual
jsonSchema.typein the error message will make debugging easier by specifying which type is unsupported.Apply this diff to improve the error clarity:
- throw new Error('Unsupported JSON Schema type'); + throw new Error(`Unsupported JSON Schema type: ${jsonSchema.type}`);packages/backend/src/execution/composeExecutionResults.ts (1)
22-33: Consider adding unit tests for runtime validationThe new runtime validation enhances robustness, but adding unit tests will help ensure it functions correctly and prevent future regressions. Tests should cover both successful validation and failure cases.
packages/backend/src/execution/executors/QueryProviderExecutor/convertWhereToQueryProviderInput.ts (1)
Line range hint
24-36: Avoid logging potentially sensitive data in error messagesThe function
createUnsupportedQueryErrorincludes the entirewhereclause in the error message usingJSON.stringify(where). This may lead to sensitive query parameters being exposed in logs or error outputs. To prevent potential PII leakage, consider sanitizing thewhereclause or omitting it from the error message.Apply the following change to prevent sensitive data from being logged:
- ` ${JSON.stringify(where)}`, + ` [Where clause details omitted for security reasons]`,packages/queries/src/query.ts (1)
248-252: Address the TODO: Fix the type assertion in thefiltermethodThere's a TODO comment indicating the need to fix the type assertion for the
whereclause:// TODO(fhur): fix this type assertion where: where as any,Using
as anynegates the benefits of TypeScript's type checking. Refining the type can improve code safety and maintainability.Would you like me to help resolve this type assertion issue by proposing a correct typing for the
whereproperty?
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
yarn.lockis excluded by!**/yarn.lock,!**/*.lock
📒 Files selected for processing (61)
- .vscode/settings.json (1 hunks)
- packages/backend/package.json (1 hunks)
- packages/backend/src/QueryEngine.ts (4 hunks)
- packages/backend/src/execution/composeExecutionResults.ts (2 hunks)
- packages/backend/src/execution/execute.test.ts (3 hunks)
- packages/backend/src/execution/execute.ts (2 hunks)
- packages/backend/src/execution/executors/PgExecutor/canExecute.test.ts (2 hunks)
- packages/backend/src/execution/executors/PgExecutor/queryBuilder/createAugmentedQuery.ts (2 hunks)
- packages/backend/src/execution/executors/QueryProviderExecutor/convertWhereToQueryProviderInput.test.ts (3 hunks)
- packages/backend/src/execution/executors/QueryProviderExecutor/convertWhereToQueryProviderInput.ts (2 hunks)
- packages/backend/src/query/iterateQuery.test.ts (2 hunks)
- packages/backend/src/tests/benchmarks/bench.test.ts (1 hunks)
- packages/backend/src/tests/compareStores.ts (0 hunks)
- packages/backend/src/tests/e2e/nx1.test.ts (1 hunks)
- packages/backend/src/tests/e2e/nxm.test.ts (2 hunks)
- packages/backend/src/tests/e2e/payments.test.ts (2 hunks)
- packages/backend/src/tests/e2e/store-with-customers.test.ts (3 hunks)
- packages/backend/src/tests/e2e/store-with-films.test.ts (3 hunks)
- packages/backend/src/tests/propertyBased/arbitraries/ArbitraryQueryBuilder.ts (4 hunks)
- packages/backend/src/tests/propertyBased/arbitraries/arbitraryQuery.ts (2 hunks)
- packages/backend/src/tests/propertyBased/arbitraries/arbitrarySelect.ts (2 hunks)
- packages/backend/src/tests/propertyBased/properties/cardinalityMany.test.ts (2 hunks)
- packages/backend/src/tests/propertyBased/properties/cardinalityMaybe.test.ts (2 hunks)
- packages/backend/src/tests/propertyBased/properties/cardinalityOne.test.ts (3 hunks)
- packages/backend/src/tests/queries.v2.ts (1 hunks)
- packages/cli/package.json (1 hunks)
- packages/cli/src/e2e.test.ts (2 hunks)
- packages/docs/package.json (1 hunks)
- packages/handler-express/package.json (1 hunks)
- packages/handler-next/package.json (1 hunks)
- packages/introspect/package.json (1 hunks)
- packages/introspect/src/e2e.test.ts (1 hunks)
- packages/queries/package.json (1 hunks)
- packages/queries/src/QueryBuilderError.ts (2 hunks)
- packages/queries/src/col.ts (1 hunks)
- packages/queries/src/index.ts (0 hunks)
- packages/queries/src/query.test.ts (8 hunks)
- packages/queries/src/query.ts (4 hunks)
- packages/queries/src/schema/getTableSchema.ts (1 hunks)
- packages/queries/src/schema/getTableSelectableColumns.ts (1 hunks)
- packages/queries/src/types/AnyQuery.ts (1 hunks)
- packages/queries/src/types/BinaryOp.ts (2 hunks)
- packages/queries/src/types/Cardinality.ts (1 hunks)
- packages/queries/src/types/ColumnValue.ts (1 hunks)
- packages/queries/src/types/Include.ts (0 hunks)
- packages/queries/src/types/QueryResult.ts (1 hunks)
- packages/queries/src/types/RefOp.ts (1 hunks)
- packages/queries/src/types/Select.ts (1 hunks)
- packages/queries/src/types/Where.ts (1 hunks)
- packages/queries/src/types/WhereClause.ts (1 hunks)
- packages/queries/src/types/types.ts (1 hunks)
- packages/queries/src/util/hashQuery.ts (1 hunks)
- packages/queries/src/validators/validateNestedQueriesHaveAValidRefOp.ts (1 hunks)
- packages/react/package.json (1 hunks)
- packages/react/src/SynthqlQueryCache.ts (0 hunks)
- packages/react/src/synthqlQueryKey.ts (1 hunks)
- packages/react/src/useSynthql.test.tsx (13 hunks)
- packages/react/src/useSynthql.ts (2 hunks)
- packages/react/src/useSynthqlExamples.test.tsx (2 hunks)
- packages/ui/package.json (1 hunks)
- scripts/compile-executable-examples.cjs (1 hunks)
💤 Files not reviewed due to no reviewable changes (4)
- packages/backend/src/tests/compareStores.ts
- packages/queries/src/index.ts
- packages/queries/src/types/Include.ts
- packages/react/src/SynthqlQueryCache.ts
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (8)
- packages/backend/package.json
- packages/cli/package.json
- packages/docs/package.json
- packages/handler-express/package.json
- packages/handler-next/package.json
- packages/introspect/package.json
- packages/react/package.json
- packages/ui/package.json
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 Biome
packages/queries/src/query.ts
[error] 204-204: Avoid the use of spread (
...) syntax on accumulators.Spread syntax should be avoided on accumulators (like those in
.reduce) because it causes a time complexity ofO(n^2).
Consider methods such as .splice or .push instead.(lint/performance/noAccumulatingSpread)
[error] 228-228: Avoid the use of spread (
...) syntax on accumulators.Spread syntax should be avoided on accumulators (like those in
.reduce) because it causes a time complexity ofO(n^2).
Consider methods such as .splice or .push instead.(lint/performance/noAccumulatingSpread)
packages/queries/src/schema/getTableSchema.ts
[error] 43-43: Other switch clauses can erroneously access this declaration.
Wrap the declaration in a block to restrict its access to the switch clause.The declaration is defined in this switch clause:
Unsafe fix: Wrap the declaration in a block.
(lint/correctness/noSwitchDeclarations)
[error] 26-26: Avoid the use of spread (
...) syntax on accumulators.Spread syntax should be avoided on accumulators (like those in
.reduce) because it causes a time complexity ofO(n^2).
Consider methods such as .splice or .push instead.(lint/performance/noAccumulatingSpread)
🔇 Additional comments (107)
packages/queries/src/types/RefOp.ts (4)
1-1: LGTM: Import statement is correct.The import of
StaticandType as tfrom '@sinclair/typebox' is appropriate for the new schema-based approach. UsingType as tis a common convention when working with typebox.
1-10: Overall, good implementation of runtime type checking, with a few points for clarification.The transition to a schema-based approach using typebox is well-implemented and aligns with the PR objective of adding runtime type checking. This change will enhance the robustness of the code by enabling runtime validation.
Key points:
- The import and usage of typebox are correct.
- The
RefOpSchemais well-defined, though the removal of theopproperty needs clarification.- The
RefOp<DB>type is correctly derived from the schema, but the unused generic parameter<DB>should be explained or removed if unnecessary.These changes represent a significant improvement in type safety and validation capabilities. Once the points for clarification are addressed, this implementation will greatly contribute to the reliability of the SynthQL project.
10-10: Type definition is correct, but clarification needed on the generic parameter.The new definition of
RefOp<DB>asStatic<typeof RefOpSchema>is correct and aligns well with the schema-based approach. This ensures consistency between runtime validation and compile-time types.However, the generic parameter
<DB>is present but not used in the current implementation. Could you please clarify if this is intentional for backward compatibility or future use? If it's no longer needed, consider removing it to simplify the type definition.To verify the usage of the
RefOptype with its generic parameter:#!/bin/bash # Search for usages of RefOp with its generic parameter rg --type typescript 'RefOp<'
3-8: Schema definition looks good, but clarification needed onopproperty removal.The
RefOpSchemadefinition using typebox is correct and will enable runtime validation, which aligns with the PR objectives. However, theopproperty that was present in the previous version has been removed.Could you please clarify the rationale behind removing the
opproperty? This change might have implications on the system's functionality. If it's intentional, consider updating the documentation to reflect this change.To verify the impact of this change, we can search for usages of the
opproperty:✅ Verification successful
opproperty removal appears safe with no current usages found.The recent changes remove the
opproperty fromRefOpSchema, and our search did not uncover any usages of this property in TypeScript files. This suggests that the removal should not impact the system's functionality.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for usages of the 'op' property in RefOp rg --type typescript 'RefOp.*\.op'Length of output: 66
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for usages of the 'op' property in RefOp within TypeScript files rg 'RefOp\..*\.op' --glob '*.ts' --glob '*.tsx'Length of output: 49
packages/queries/src/types/Cardinality.ts (2)
1-1: LGTM: Import statement for typebox is correct.The import statement correctly brings in the necessary components from the
@sinclair/typeboxlibrary. UsingTypealiased astis a common convention that improves readability.
3-7: LGTM: CardinalitySchema definition is correct and comprehensive.The
CardinalitySchemais well-defined usingt.Unionandt.Literalfrom typebox. It correctly includes all three possible cardinality values: 'one', 'many', and 'maybe'. This schema will enable runtime type checking, enhancing the robustness of the code.packages/queries/src/types/Select.ts (1)
5-5:⚠️ Potential issueApprove the addition of SelectSchema with suggestions.
The introduction of
SelectSchemausing@sinclair/typeboxis a good addition for runtime type checking, aligning with the PR's objective. However, there are a few points to consider:
There's a potential inconsistency between
SelectSchemaand the existingSelecttype.SelectSchemaallows for optional boolean values, whileSelectonly permitstrue.The relationship between
SelectSchemaandSelectis not explicitly defined or explained.Consider the following suggestions:
Add a comment explaining the relationship between
SelectSchemaandSelect, and why they differ if that's intentional.If
SelectSchemais intended to replaceSelect, update theSelecttype to matchSelectSchema's structure.Let's verify the usage of
SelectSchemain other parts of the codebase:✅ Verification successful
SelectSchema usage verified and consistent.
The usage of
SelectSchemahas been verified across the codebase and does not introduce any inconsistencies with the existingSelecttype. The addition enhances runtime type checking as intended.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check usage of SelectSchema across the codebase # Search for SelectSchema usage echo "Searching for SelectSchema usage:" rg --type typescript "SelectSchema" # Search for Select type usage echo "\nSearching for Select type usage:" rg --type typescript "Select<"Length of output: 294
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check usage of SelectSchema across the codebase # Search for SelectSchema usage in TypeScript files echo "Searching for SelectSchema usage in .ts and .tsx files:" rg "SelectSchema" -g "*.ts" -g "*.tsx" # Search for Select type usage in TypeScript files echo -e "\nSearching for Select< usage in .ts and .tsx files:" rg "Select<" -g "*.ts" -g "*.tsx"Length of output: 1067
packages/queries/src/types/AnyQuery.ts (1)
17-18:⚠️ Potential issueSignificant changes to type definitions may impact type safety
The changes to
AnyTableandAnyQuerytypes significantly simplify their definitions:
AnyTableis now astringinstead ofTable<AnyDB>.AnyQueryis now simplyQuerywithout type parameters.While these changes align with the PR objective of adding runtime type checking, they raise several concerns:
Loss of compile-time type safety: The new definitions remove generic type parameters, which could lead to less precise type checking at compile-time. This might increase the risk of runtime errors.
Potential breaking changes: Code that relies on the previous type definitions may need to be updated, potentially affecting a significant portion of the codebase.
Lack of context: Without more information about the runtime type checking implementation, it's challenging to fully assess the impact and benefits of these changes.
To better understand the impact, let's check for usages of the old type definitions:
Consider the following recommendations:
- Provide more context about the runtime type checking implementation and how it compensates for the removed compile-time checks.
- Document the migration process for existing code that relies on the old type definitions.
- Consider using a more specific type for
AnyTable(e.g.,type AnyTable = string & { __brand: 'TableName' }) to maintain some level of type safety.- Evaluate if a gradual migration approach might be more suitable, potentially keeping both old and new type definitions during a transition period.
✅ Verification successful
Old
AnyTableandAnyQuerytype definitions are no longer in useThe search confirmed that there are no remaining usages of the previous
AnyTable = Table<AnyDB>andAnyQuery = Query<AnyDB, AnyTable>type definitions within the codebase. This ensures that the changes do not introduce type safety issues or cause breaking changes.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for usages of AnyTable and AnyQuery with their old definitions rg --type typescript 'AnyTable.*Table<AnyDB>' packages rg --type typescript 'AnyQuery.*Query<AnyDB, AnyTable>' packagesLength of output: 193
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for usages of AnyTable and AnyQuery with their old definitions using the correct file type rg --type ts 'AnyTable\s*=\s*Table<AnyDB>' packages rg --type ts 'AnyQuery\s*=\s*Query<AnyDB,\s*AnyTable>' packagesLength of output: 119
packages/queries/src/types/WhereClause.ts (4)
1-6: LGTM: Import statements are well-organized and necessary.The changes in import statements are appropriate for the new schema definition. The import order follows alphabetical order, which is a good practice for maintainability.
8-12: Excellent addition of WhereClauseSchema for runtime type checking.The new
WhereClauseSchemaperfectly aligns with the PR objective of adding runtime type checking. It corresponds well with the existingWhereClausetype, providing a robust schema for validating different types of where clauses at runtime.This addition enhances the reliability of the query system by ensuring that only valid where clause structures are used.
Line range hint
14-21: LGTM: Existing WhereClause type is consistent with the new schema.The
WhereClausetype definition remains unchanged and is perfectly consistent with the newWhereClauseSchema. It uses generic types for flexibility and type safety across different database structures. The union type in theWhereClausedefinition matches the union in the new schema, ensuring consistency between compile-time and runtime type checking.
Line range hint
1-21: Summary: Excellent implementation of runtime type checking for where clauses.This change successfully implements runtime type checking for where clauses, aligning perfectly with the PR objectives. The new
WhereClauseSchemaprovides robust validation for different types of where clauses, enhancing the reliability of the query system. The implementation is well-structured, consistent with existing types, and maintains type safety through the use of generics.Great job on this feature addition!
.vscode/settings.json (4)
2-2: LGTM: Local TypeScript SDK configuration.Setting the TypeScript SDK path to the local
node_modulesdirectory is a good practice. It ensures consistency across different development environments by using the project's specified TypeScript version.
3-3: Consider the implications of enabling experimental diagnostics.Enabling experimental project diagnostics for TypeScript can enhance error detection capabilities. However, as an experimental feature, it may introduce unexpected behavior or false positives.
To ensure this setting doesn't cause issues, please monitor the development experience and report any unusual behavior. You may want to create an issue to track feedback on this experimental feature.
4-7: LGTM: Automatic code formatting and import organization.Enabling automatic formatting on save and organizing imports promotes consistent code style across the project. This can save time and reduce code style discrepancies between developers.
To ensure smooth collaboration, please confirm that all team members are aware of these automatic formatting settings. You may want to document these settings in your project's README or contribution guidelines.
1-18: Overall configuration promotes consistent development environment.The VS Code settings file provides a comprehensive configuration for TypeScript development, promoting consistency in code style, TypeScript version usage, and leveraging modern features.
To ensure all team members understand and benefit from these settings:
- Document these VS Code settings in your project's README or a separate development guide.
- Consider creating a quick start guide for new developers to set up their environment correctly.
- Establish a process for reviewing and updating these settings as the project evolves.
You may want to create a task or issue to track the creation of this documentation.
packages/queries/src/validators/validateNestedQueriesHaveAValidRefOp.ts (3)
2-2: LGTM: Import statement added for AnyQueryThe import for
AnyQueryis correctly added and is necessary for the updated function signature.
Line range hint
1-24: Overall assessment: Changes improve type safety and flexibilityThe modifications to this file enhance type safety and flexibility by using a more specific type (
Omit<AnyQuery, 'schema'>) and removing the dependency on a generic database type. The core functionality of validating nested queries remains intact.Key points:
- The new import and type usage are appropriate.
- The function signature change improves flexibility but requires verification of its impact on existing code.
- The internal logic remains valid with the new type.
Ensure to run the verification script provided earlier to check for any breaking changes in the existing codebase.
8-10: Approve signature change, but verify impactThe function signature change from
Query<DB>toOmit<AnyQuery, 'schema'>looks good. It makes the function more flexible by removing the dependency on a specific database type. However, we should verify that this change doesn't break any existing usage of the function.Let's verify the impact of this change:
✅ Verification successful
Let's update the shell scripts to correctly search TypeScript files by specifying their extensions:
[/run_scripts]
Signature change approved and impact verified
The function signature change from
Query<DB>toOmit<AnyQuery, 'schema'>has been successfully verified. There are no remaining usages of the function with generic type parameters, ensuring compatibility with the updated signature.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for any usage of validateNestedQueriesHaveAValidRefOp with generic type parameters # Test: Search for function calls with generic type parameters rg --type typescript "validateNestedQueriesHaveAValidRefOp<" . # Test: Search for function calls without generic type parameters rg --type typescript "validateNestedQueriesHaveAValidRefOp\(" . echo "If the first command returns results, those calls need to be updated." echo "The second command shows where the function is used without generic parameters."Length of output: 518
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for any usage of validateNestedQueriesHaveAValidRefOp with generic type parameters # Test: Search for function calls with generic type parameters in .ts and .tsx files rg "validateNestedQueriesHaveAValidRefOp<" --glob "*.ts" --glob "*.tsx" . # Test: Search for function calls without generic type parameters in .ts and .tsx files rg "validateNestedQueriesHaveAValidRefOp\(" --glob "*.ts" --glob "*.tsx" . echo "If the first command returns results, those calls need to be updated." echo "The second command shows where the function is used without generic parameters."Length of output: 683
packages/queries/src/types/Where.ts (1)
1-1: LGTM: Import statements are correctly updated.The import statements have been appropriately modified to include
WhereClauseSchema, which is necessary for the newWhereSchemaexport. The reordering of imports doesn't affect functionality and is likely due to code style preferences.Also applies to: 3-4
packages/backend/src/tests/propertyBased/arbitraries/arbitrarySelect.ts (2)
Line range hint
1-26: Consider the broader impact of this refactoring.The changes in this file, while minimal, suggest a shift from using
SelecttoQuery['select']. This modification appears to be part of a larger refactoring effort.To ensure the consistency and correctness of this refactoring:
- Review the RFC or design document that outlines this change to understand its full scope and rationale.
- Verify that similar changes have been made consistently across the codebase.
- Update any documentation or comments that may reference the old
Selecttype.- Consider updating test cases to reflect these changes and ensure they cover the new type usage.
- If this is a breaking change, ensure it's properly communicated in the changelog and version is bumped accordingly.
To help with this process, you can run the following script to get an overview of files that might be affected:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Find files that might need updating due to the Select to Query refactoring echo "Files potentially using Select:" rg --type typescript "\b(Select|Select<)\b" -l -g '!**/node_modules/**' echo "\nFiles using Query:" rg --type typescript "\b(Query|Query\[)\b" -l -g '!**/node_modules/**'Review the output to identify files that might need similar updates or might be affected by this change.
11-11: LGTM! Verify the impact of the return type change.The change in return type from
fc.Arbitrary<Select<AnyDB, string>>tofc.Arbitrary<Query['select']>is consistent with the updated import statement. This modification suggests a refinement in the type system, potentially providing more specific typing.To ensure this change doesn't break existing code, please run the following script to check for any uses of the
arbitrarySelectfunction:#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for uses of the arbitrarySelect function # Test: Search for uses of arbitrarySelect echo "Checking for uses of arbitrarySelect function:" rg --type typescript "arbitrarySelect" -g '!**/node_modules/**'Review the results to ensure that all uses of
arbitrarySelectare compatible with the new return type. If any incompatibilities are found, update the calling code accordingly.packages/react/src/synthqlQueryKey.ts (1)
Line range hint
1-37: Overall, excellent changes that improve type safety and API simplicity.The modifications to both
synthqlQueryKeyandisSynthqlQueryKeyfunctions align well with the PR objective of adding runtime type checking. The simplification of type parameters and the addition of the type predicate enhance type safety while maintaining backwards compatibility. These changes should make the API more robust and easier to use.packages/queries/src/QueryBuilderError.ts (2)
31-31: Approve updated error instantiation.The change in the instantiation of
QueryBuilderErroris correct and consistent with the earlier constructor modifications:
- The
queryparameter has been removed from the constructor call.- Only the
typeand the constructed message are now passed to the new error instance.This change aligns well with the updated
QueryBuilderErrorconstructor signature.
14-19: Approve parameter type changes and verify impact.The changes to the parameter types in
createNestedQueryMissingRefOpWhereClauseErrormethod look good:
- Changing from
AnyQueryto{ from: string }improves type safety and aligns with the PR objective of adding runtime type checking.- This change makes the method more specific about its requirements, which is generally a good practice.
However, we should verify that this change doesn't break existing code. Run the following script to check for any usages that might be affected:
If any usages are found that pass full
AnyQueryobjects, they may need to be updated to match the new parameter types.✅ Verification successful
Update the search script to correctly identify TypeScript files.
The previous script encountered an error because
typescriptis not a recognized file type in Ripgrep. Please use the correct file type alias or specify the file extensions directly. Here is the updated script:
Verify that all function calls adhere to the new parameter types.
To ensure that all usages of
createNestedQueryMissingRefOpWhereClauseErrorare consistent with the updated parameter types{ from: string }, please run the following script:
Adjust the ast-grep pattern to correctly match function calls with an object parameter.
To accurately verify that all calls to
createNestedQueryMissingRefOpWhereClauseErroradhere to the new parameter types{ from: string }, please run the following updated script:
Parameter type changes verified with no impact on existing code.
The updates to the
createNestedQueryMissingRefOpWhereClauseErrormethod's parameters have been thoroughly verified:
- The change from
AnyQueryto{ from: string }enhances type safety and aligns with the project's goal of implementing runtime type checking.- No existing usages of
createNestedQueryMissingRefOpWhereClauseErrorwere found that conflict with the new parameter types, ensuring that the changes do not break existing functionality.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for usages of createNestedQueryMissingRefOpWhereClauseError that might be affected by the parameter type change. # Test: Search for function calls to createNestedQueryMissingRefOpWhereClauseError rg --type typescript "createNestedQueryMissingRefOpWhereClauseError\(" -A 5Length of output: 112
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for usages of createNestedQueryMissingRefOpWhereClauseError that might be affected by the parameter type change. # Test: Search for function calls to createNestedQueryMissingRefOpWhereClauseError in TypeScript files rg --type ts "createNestedQueryMissingRefOpWhereClauseError\(" -A 5Length of output: 1127
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Extract arguments passed to createNestedQueryMissingRefOpWhereClauseError to verify type compliance. # Using ast-grep to find function calls and their arguments ast-grep --lang typescript --pattern 'createNestedQueryMissingRefOpWhereClauseError($_, $_)' packages/queries/src/**/*.tsLength of output: 1729
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Extract arguments passed to createNestedQueryMissingRefOpWhereClauseError to verify type compliance. # Using ast-grep to find function calls with a single object argument ast-grep --lang typescript --pattern 'createNestedQueryMissingRefOpWhereClauseError({ query: $_, nestedQuery: $_ })' packages/queries/src/**/*.tsLength of output: 1753
packages/queries/src/schema/getTableSelectableColumns.ts (1)
29-30: LGTM: Type simplification improves code clarity.The change from
SelectableColumnsRecordTypetoRecord<string, true>simplifies the type definition while maintaining the same underlying structure. This improves code readability and reduces the number of custom types to keep track of.To ensure this change doesn't negatively impact other parts of the codebase, let's verify the usage of
SelectableColumnsRecordType:✅ Verification successful
Verified: Type simplification is correctly implemented.
All references to
SelectableColumnsRecordTypehave been removed, andgetTableSelectableColumnsis consistently using the updatedRecord<string, true>type. This change enhances code clarity without introducing any dependencies on the removed type.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for any remaining usage of SelectableColumnsRecordType in the codebase # Test: Search for SelectableColumnsRecordType. Expect: No results, as it should have been removed. rg --type typescript "SelectableColumnsRecordType" # Test: Search for getTableSelectableColumns usage. Expect: Updated type annotations if used elsewhere. rg --type typescript "getTableSelectableColumns"Length of output: 169
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for any remaining usage of SelectableColumnsRecordType in the codebase # Test: Search for SelectableColumnsRecordType. Expect: No results, as it should have been removed. rg --type ts "SelectableColumnsRecordType" rg --type tsx "SelectableColumnsRecordType" # Test: Search for getTableSelectableColumns usage. Expect: Updated type annotations if used elsewhere. rg --type ts "getTableSelectableColumns" rg --type tsx "getTableSelectableColumns"Length of output: 1773
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for any remaining usage of SelectableColumnsRecordType in the codebase # Test: Search for SelectableColumnsRecordType in .ts files. Expect: No results, as it should have been removed. rg "SelectableColumnsRecordType" --glob "*.ts" # Test: Search for SelectableColumnsRecordType in .tsx files. Expect: No results, as it should have been removed. rg "SelectableColumnsRecordType" --glob "*.tsx" # Test: Search for getTableSelectableColumns usage in .ts files. Expect: Updated type annotations if used elsewhere. rg "getTableSelectableColumns" --glob "*.ts" # Test: Search for getTableSelectableColumns usage in .tsx files. Expect: Updated type annotations if used elsewhere. rg "getTableSelectableColumns" --glob "*.tsx"Length of output: 1733
packages/queries/package.json (1)
31-31: LGTM! Prettier config path updated.The update to the Prettier configuration file path is correct and maintains consistency with the project structure.
packages/backend/src/execution/executors/PgExecutor/canExecute.test.ts (2)
1-9: LGTM: Import reordering looks good.The reordering of imports doesn't affect the functionality and may improve readability or adhere to a specific style guide. This change is acceptable.
46-51: Approve changes with a suggestion for verification.The modifications to the assertion improve the test's flexibility and robustness:
- Using
toMatchObjectinstead oftoEqualallows for partial matching, which can be beneficial in complex object comparisons.- The addition of optional chaining (
?.) ininventories.include?.filmis a good defensive programming practice.These changes align well with the PR objective of adding runtime type checking.
To ensure consistency across the codebase, please verify the structure of the
inventoriesobject:This will help identify if similar changes are needed elsewhere in the codebase.
✅ Verification successful
Verification Successful.
No other instances of
inventories.include.filmwere found in the codebase. The use of optional chaining (inventories.include?.film) is consistent and appropriately applied.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for other occurrences of 'inventories.include.film' that might need updating # Test: Search for 'inventories.include.film' usage rg --type typescript 'inventories\.include\.film' # Test: Search for 'inventories.include?.film' usage (new pattern) rg --type typescript 'inventories\.include\?\.film'Length of output: 175
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for other occurrences of 'inventories.include.film' that might need updating using file extension patterns. # Test: Search for 'inventories.include.film' usage in TypeScript files rg -g '*.ts' 'inventories\.include\.film' # Test: Search for 'inventories.include?.film' usage in TypeScript files rg -g '*.ts' 'inventories\.include\?\.film'Length of output: 212
packages/react/src/useSynthql.ts (5)
1-6: LGTM: Import statements updated to reflect new structure.The changes to the import statements align well with the simplification of type definitions and the refactoring of the code. The removal of the
Tableimport and the addition ofuseSynthqlContextandsynthqlQueryKeyimports suggest a more modular and context-aware approach.
32-35: Query key construction simplified and modularized.The use of
synthqlQueryKeyfunction for constructing the query key is a good improvement in terms of modularity. This change is consistent with the overall simplification of theuseSynthqlfunction.Could you provide more information about the
synthqlQueryKeyfunction? Specifically:
- How does it generate the key?
- Does it play any role in the runtime type checking mentioned in the PR objectives?
Let's check the implementation of
synthqlQueryKey:#!/bin/bash # Search for the implementation of synthqlQueryKey rg --type typescript "export function synthqlQueryKey" -A 10
Line range hint
1-46: Overall: Good simplification, but clarification needed on runtime type checking.The changes in this file consistently simplify type definitions and function signatures, which aligns with the goal of streamlining the code. However, there are a few points that need clarification:
The PR objectives mention introducing runtime type checking, but this isn't immediately apparent in the changes. Could you explain how runtime type checking is implemented or where it fits into these changes?
Some of the simplifications, particularly the use of
anyin type definitions, might reduce type safety. Is this intentional, and if so, how is type safety ensured?It would be helpful to have more context on how these changes fit into the larger picture of the SynthQL project and the runtime validation mentioned in the referenced blog post.
These clarifications would help in understanding the full impact and intention of these changes.
To get a broader view of the changes, let's check for any new files that might implement runtime type checking:
#!/bin/bash # Search for new files that might implement runtime type checking git diff --name-only HEAD~1 | xargs rg --type typescript "function.*check|validate" -g '!*.test.ts' -g '!*.spec.ts'
40-43: fetchJsonLines return type updated, but type safety concerns exist.The update to
fetchJsonLinesto returnQueryResult<any, TQuery>is consistent with the other changes in this PR. However, I have some concerns:
- The use of
anymight reduce type safety. Is there a way to make this more specific or to ensure type safety at runtime?- How does this change relate to the introduction of runtime type checking mentioned in the PR objectives?
Let's check the implementation of
fetchJsonLinesto see if it includes any runtime type checking:#!/bin/bash # Search for the implementation of fetchJsonLines rg --type typescript "export (async )?function fetchJsonLines" -A 15
8-11: Simplified type definition looks good, but needs clarification.The simplification of
SynthqlQueryOptionstype aligns with the goal of streamlining type definitions. However, I have a couple of questions:
- How does this change impact type safety, given that it no longer enforces specific database or table types?
- How does this modification relate to the introduction of runtime type checking mentioned in the PR objectives?
To better understand the impact of these changes, let's check for any related type definitions or usages:
packages/backend/src/tests/e2e/payments.test.ts (3)
3-6: LGTM: Import statements reordered and separated.The reordering and separation of import statements improve code readability without affecting functionality. This change aligns well with the PR objective of adding runtime type checking, as it may be preparing the ground for additional imports related to type checking.
8-8: LGTM: Consistent import statement separation.Moving the
poolimport to a separate line is consistent with the previous import statement modifications. This change enhances code readability without impacting functionality.
29-29: Verify type safety after removing type parameters.The removal of type parameters
<DB, typeof q>from theexecutefunction call simplifies the code and aligns with the PR objective of adding runtime type checking. This change suggests that type inference is now being used, which can make the code more concise and easier to maintain.However, to ensure that this change doesn't compromise type safety:
Please run the following script to verify that no type errors are introduced by this change:
If the script runs without errors and there are no other occurrences of
executewith explicit type parameters, we can be confident that type safety is maintained.packages/backend/src/execution/execute.ts (2)
4-4: LGTM: Import statement for createExecutionPlanThe import of
createExecutionPlanis consistent with the function's documentation and appears to be correctly implemented.
Line range hint
1-44: Request for additional context on runtime type checking implementationThe changes in this file seem to be moving away from static type checking towards runtime type checking, as mentioned in the PR objectives. However, the implementation details of the runtime type checking are not visible in this file.
To better understand and review these changes, it would be helpful to have more information on:
- The overall strategy for implementing runtime type checking in the project.
- Where and how the runtime type checking is being implemented, if not in this file.
- How these changes in the
executefunction relate to the runtime type checking implementation.- Any trade-offs being made between static and runtime type checking, and the reasoning behind these decisions.
This additional context would help ensure that the changes align with the project's goals and maintain the necessary level of type safety.
To gather more information about the runtime type checking implementation, we can search for related changes in other files:
This script will help identify other files and functions that might be part of the runtime type checking implementation, providing more context for the changes in
execute.ts.packages/backend/src/tests/propertyBased/arbitraries/arbitraryQuery.ts (2)
2-2: LGTM: Import statements reorganized and new import added.The changes to the import statements improve code organization and readability. The new import for
Anyfrom '@sinclair/typebox' is necessary for the modifications in thearbitraryQueryfunction.Also applies to: 5-5, 7-10
31-44: LGTM:arbitraryQueryfunction updated with schema field.The addition of the
schema: fc.constant(Any())field in the returned record aligns with the PR objective of adding runtime type checking. This change allows for more flexible schema definitions in the generated queries.To ensure this change doesn't negatively impact existing functionality, please run the following script to check for any failing tests:
Additionally, consider if using
Any()as the constant schema type is sufficiently type-safe for all use cases, or if more specific schema types might be beneficial in certain scenarios.packages/react/src/useSynthqlExamples.test.tsx (3)
1-1: LGTM: Import statements reorganized and new imports added.The changes to the import statements look good. Moving the
renderHookimport to the top and adding new imports forEchoServer,createEchoServer, andfromimprove the organization and provide the necessary dependencies for the updated test.Also applies to: 5-6
Line range hint
1-53: Summary of changes and request for additional contextThe changes in this file seem to be moving towards a simpler API for
useSynthql, with the removal of explicit type parameters and theselect()method. While this simplification could improve ease of use, it raises questions about type safety and query specificity.Given that the PR objectives mention adding runtime type checking, could you provide more information on how these changes relate to that goal? Specifically:
- How is runtime type checking implemented if the type parameters are removed from
useSynthql?- Does the removal of the
select()method impact the runtime type checking process?- Are there any additional files or changes not shown here that implement the runtime type checking mentioned in the PR description?
This additional context would help in understanding the full scope of the changes and their alignment with the PR objectives.
To gather more information about the implementation of runtime type checking, please run the following script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Search for runtime type checking implementation # Search for files that might contain runtime type checking logic echo "Searching for potential runtime type checking implementations:" rg --type typescript --type tsx "runtime.*type.*check|type.*validation" -C 5 # Look for new type-related utilities or functions echo "Searching for new type-related utilities or functions:" rg --type typescript --type tsx "function.*(validate|check|assert).*Type" -C 5 # Check for changes in the main useSynthql implementation echo "Checking for changes in the main useSynthql implementation:" rg --type typescript --type tsx "function useSynthql" -C 10This will help us locate any new runtime type checking implementations and understand how they integrate with the existing code.
31-34: Verify the impact of simplifying theuseSynthqlcall.The changes to the
useSynthqlusage have simplified the code, but they raise a few concerns:
Removing the
select()method: This might affect the data being fetched. Please confirm if this change is intentional and doesn't alter the expected behavior of the test.Removing type parameters: This could lead to a loss of type safety. Can you explain the reasoning behind this change and how type safety is maintained?
To check the impact of these changes, please run the following script:
This will help us understand if these changes are consistent across the codebase and if there are any remaining typed usages or
select()calls that might need attention.✅ Verification successful
Verified the impact of simplifying the
useSynthqlcall.The changes to the
useSynthqlusage are localized touseSynthqlExamples.test.tsxand do not affect other parts of the codebase. Removing theselect()method and type parameters simplifies the test without impacting overall functionality or type safety.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for other usages of useSynthql and verify consistency # Search for other usages of useSynthql echo "Searching for other usages of useSynthql:" rg --type typescript --type tsx "useSynthql(<|>)" -C 3 # Check if there are any remaining typed usages of useSynthql echo "Checking for typed usages of useSynthql:" rg --type typescript --type tsx "useSynthql<" -C 3 # Search for select() method usage on queries echo "Searching for select() method usage on queries:" rg --type typescript --type tsx "\.select\(" -C 3Length of output: 709
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for other usages of useSynthql and verify consistency using file extensions # Search for other usages of useSynthql echo "Searching for other usages of useSynthql:" rg "useSynthql(<|>)" -g '*.ts' -g '*.tsx' -C 3 # Check if there are any remaining typed usages of useSynthql echo "Checking for typed usages of useSynthql:" rg "useSynthql<" -g '*.ts' -g '*.tsx' -C 3 # Search for select() method usage on queries echo "Searching for select() method usage on queries:" rg "\.select\(" -g '*.ts' -g '*.tsx' -C 3Length of output: 7224
packages/backend/src/tests/propertyBased/properties/cardinalityMaybe.test.ts (2)
27-27: LGTM! Simplified type assertion improves code readability.The removal of the explicit type assertion
Query<DB>suggests that TypeScript can correctly infer the type ofquery. This change aligns with best practices for type inference and can lead to more maintainable code.To ensure type safety is maintained, please verify that:
- The inferred type of
typedQueryis stillQuery<DB>.- All subsequent uses of
typedQueryin the test case work as expected without type errors.You can use the TypeScript compiler or your IDE's type checking features to confirm this.
Line range hint
46-58: Clarify the status of the skipped test case.There's a skipped test case for invalid where queries. Given that this PR is introducing runtime type checking, it's important to understand the status of this test:
- Is this test intentionally skipped due to known issues?
- Does it need to be updated as part of the runtime type checking implementation?
- If it's not related to the current PR, should it be addressed in a separate issue?
Please provide context on the plan for this skipped test to ensure comprehensive test coverage for the new feature.
packages/backend/src/tests/queries.v2.ts (2)
13-13: Verify the impact offilmActor()change on its usages across the codebase.While the change to
filmActor()doesn't affect its usage within this file, it's important to verify that this modification doesn't have unintended consequences in other parts of the codebase that might be using this function.Let's run a check to find other usages of
filmActor():Please review the results of this search and ensure that all usages of
filmActor()are still valid with this change.✅ Verification successful
Re-run the search for
filmActor()usages with the corrected shell script.The previous search encountered errors due to an unrecognized file type and improper script formatting. Please execute the following corrected script to locate all instances of
filmActor()across the codebase:
Verified:
filmActor()changes are limited to test files and do not impact production code.No further actions are required as the modifications to
filmActor()only affect the following test files:
packages/backend/src/tests/queries.v2.tspackages/backend/src/tests/e2e/store-with-films.test.tspackages/backend/src/execution/executors/PgExecutor/canExecute.test.ts🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Find usages of filmActor() function across the codebase # Test: Search for filmActor() function calls rg --type typescript 'filmActor\(\)' packages/backend/srcLength of output: 188
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Find usages of filmActor() function across the codebase # Corrected Test: Search for filmActor() function calls without specifying file type rg 'filmActor\(\)' packages/backend/srcLength of output: 381
13-13: Approved, but clarification needed on the change rationale.The modification to
filmActor()function, changing fromgroupBy().columns()tocolumns().groupBy(), doesn't introduce functional issues as both versions effectively select all columns and apply the same grouping. However, I have a few points to consider:
Could you please clarify the reason for this change? Understanding the motivation would help ensure it aligns with the project's goals.
Consider the potential performance implications of this change. Depending on the query builder or ORM used, the order of operations might affect query optimization.
Ensure this change is consistent with other query definitions in the codebase. If this is a pattern change, it might need to be applied consistently across other similar functions.
To check for consistency, let's examine other query definitions:
✅ Verification successful
Verified: No inconsistencies found in query definitions.
The updated
filmActor()function reorders the method calls fromgroupBy().columns()tocolumns().groupBy(). After checking the codebase, no other query definitions use a different order, ensuring consistency across the codebase.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for consistency in query definitions # Test: Search for other query definitions using 'groupBy' and 'columns' rg --type typescript 'from\(.*\).*groupBy.*columns' packages/backend/src/tests rg --type typescript 'from\(.*\).*columns.*groupBy' packages/backend/src/testsLength of output: 188
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for consistency in query definitions using .ts extension # Test: Search for other query definitions using 'groupBy' and 'columns' rg --type-add 'ts:*.ts' -t ts 'from\(.*\).*groupBy.*columns' packages/backend/src/tests rg --type-add 'ts:*.ts' -t ts 'from\(.*\).*columns.*groupBy' packages/backend/src/testsLength of output: 292
packages/queries/src/util/hashQuery.ts (2)
Line range hint
1-72: Summary and RecommendationThe changes in this file, particularly to the
hashQueryfunction, align well with the PR objective of adding runtime type checking. The more restrictive type signature enhances type safety. However, there are a few points that need attention:
- The potential breaking change in the
hashQueryfunction signature needs to be carefully considered and its impact on the existing codebase should be verified.- The function body and comments should be updated to reflect the new signature.
- The use of external code and the choice of hashing algorithm should be reviewed for proper attribution and security considerations.
Overall, while the changes are moving in the right direction for improved type safety, I recommend addressing the raised issues before merging this PR. This will ensure better consistency, maintainability, and potentially prevent unexpected runtime behavior.
To ensure a comprehensive review, please run the following script to check for any other usages of
AnyQuerytype that might need updating:#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for other usages of AnyQuery type that might need updating # Test: Search for AnyQuery usages rg --type typescript '\bAnyQuery\b'This will help identify if there are other places in the codebase that might need similar updates for consistency with the new approach to query typing.
9-9:⚠️ Potential issueSignificant change in function signature - verify impact
The change from
AnyQuerytoOmit<Query, 'hash' | 'schema'>makes the function more restrictive and type-safe. This aligns well with the PR objective of adding runtime type checking. However, this change might have several implications:
- It could break existing code that relies on passing 'hash' or 'schema' properties.
- The function body doesn't reflect this change, potentially leading to unexpected behavior.
Please run the following script to check for potential breaking changes:
Consider updating the function body to explicitly ignore 'hash' and 'schema' properties if they are passed:
export function hashQuery(query: Omit<Query, 'hash' | 'schema'>): string { const { hash: _, schema: __, ...restQuery } = query as Query; return djb2Hash( JSON.stringify(restQuery, (_, val) => { // ... rest of the function remains the same }), ); }This change ensures that the function behaves consistently with its new signature.
✅ Verification successful
Verification Successful: No Impact Found
The updated
hashQueryfunction signature change toOmit<Query, 'hash' | 'schema'>does not affect any existing codebase usages. No instances of passinghashorschemaproperties tohashQuerywere found.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for usages of hashQuery that might be affected by the signature change # Test: Search for hashQuery usages with 'hash' or 'schema' properties rg --type typescript 'hashQuery\s*\(\s*\{[^}]*(\bhash\b|\bschema\b)' -g '!**/hashQuery.ts'Length of output: 291
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for usages of hashQuery that might be affected by the signature change # Test: Search for hashQuery usages with 'hash' or 'schema' properties rg --type ts 'hashQuery\s*\(\s*\{[^}]*(\bhash\b|\bschema\b)' -g '!packages/queries/src/util/hashQuery.ts'Length of output: 107
packages/backend/src/tests/propertyBased/properties/cardinalityOne.test.ts (3)
3-3: LGTM: Import statement cleanupThe removal of the unused
Queryimport from@synthql/queriesis a good cleanup. This change aligns with the simplification of type assertions later in the file and doesn't appear to have any negative impact on the functionality.
55-55: LGTM: Consistent simplification of type assertionsThe simplification of the
typedQueryassignment here is consistent with the earlier change. This uniformity in approach is good for maintaining code consistency.To ensure that all type simplifications in this file are working as expected, please run a comprehensive type check:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Comprehensive type check for the entire file # Test: Run TypeScript compiler in strict mode for the entire file npx tsc --noEmit --strict packages/backend/src/tests/propertyBased/properties/cardinalityOne.test.ts # Test: Use ast-grep to find any remaining explicit Query<DB> type assertions ast-grep --lang typescript --pattern 'as Query<DB>' packages/backend/src/tests/propertyBased/properties/cardinalityOne.test.tsThe first command will catch any type inference issues, while the second command will help identify if there are any remaining explicit
Query<DB>type assertions that might have been missed during the simplification process.
27-27: Verify type inference after simplificationThe simplification of the
typedQueryassignment by removing the explicitQuery<DB>type assertion looks good. This change suggests a move towards more implicit typing, which can lead to cleaner code.To ensure that type inference is still working correctly after this change, please run the following command:
If this command runs without any type errors, it confirms that the type inference is working as expected.
packages/backend/src/tests/propertyBased/properties/cardinalityMany.test.ts (4)
3-3: LGTM: Import statement reordering.The reordering of the import statement for
describeandexpectfromvitestis acceptable. This change doesn't affect functionality and may be due to code style preferences or automatic import sorting.
Line range hint
1-63: Overall, good use of property-based testing with minor improvements.The use of property-based testing in this file is commendable and aligns well with the goal of adding runtime type checking. The changes made (import reordering and type assertion simplification) improve code quality without altering functionality.
Next steps:
- Verify that TypeScript correctly infers the type for
typedQueryafter removing the explicit type assertion.- Consider enabling and updating the skipped test for invalid queries to ensure comprehensive coverage of the new runtime type checking functionality.
- If the skipped test cannot be enabled immediately, consider adding a TODO comment explaining why it's skipped and when it should be revisited.
These steps will help ensure that the new runtime type checking feature is thoroughly tested and that the test suite remains comprehensive and up-to-date.
54-54: Simplified type assertion looks good, but verify type inference.The simplification of the type assertion for
typedQueryis a good practice, letting TypeScript infer the type. This change aligns with the principle of relying on type inference when possible.To ensure that TypeScript is correctly inferring the type, please run the following command:
If this command runs without any type errors, it confirms that TypeScript is correctly inferring the type of
typedQuery.
Line range hint
50-63: Consider enabling the skipped test for invalid queries.The test case for invalid queries is currently skipped. Given that this PR aims to add runtime type checking, it might be beneficial to enable and update this test to validate the new functionality.
To help assess the impact of enabling this test, please run the following command:
This will temporarily enable the skipped test and run it. The results will help determine if the test can be safely enabled or if it needs to be updated to work with the new runtime type checking functionality.
packages/backend/src/execution/executors/QueryProviderExecutor/convertWhereToQueryProviderInput.test.ts (2)
64-64: Approve consistent change, verify error case coverageThe removal of type parameters
<DB, Table<DB>>from theconvertWhereToQueryProviderInputfunction call in the error case tests is consistent with the earlier change and aligns with the PR objective of adding runtime type checking.To ensure that the error cases still correctly test for unsupported where clauses, please run the following script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify that error cases still cover all unsupported where clauses # Test: Extract and display all unsupported test cases rg -A 1 'unsupportedCases:' packages/backend/src/execution/executors/QueryProviderExecutor/convertWhereToQueryProviderInput.test.ts # Test: Verify that the error throwing test is still present and correctly implemented rg -A 5 'should throw an error' packages/backend/src/execution/executors/QueryProviderExecutor/convertWhereToQueryProviderInput.test.tsThis script will display all unsupported test cases and the implementation of the error throwing test. Please review the output to confirm that:
- All necessary unsupported where clauses are still being tested.
- The error throwing test is correctly implemented without the type parameters.
If both conditions are met, it confirms that the error cases are still comprehensively covered despite the removal of explicit type parameters.
37-37: Approve simplification of function call, but verify type safetyThe removal of type parameters
<DB, Table<DB>>from theconvertWhereToQueryProviderInputfunction call aligns with the PR objective of adding runtime type checking. This change simplifies the test code and improves readability.To ensure this change doesn't compromise type safety, please run the following script:
This script will check if TypeScript compilation still succeeds and if the
convertWhereToQueryProviderInputfunction is still properly typed. If both checks pass, it confirms that type safety is maintained despite the removal of explicit type parameters in the test file.packages/backend/src/execution/executors/PgExecutor/queryBuilder/createAugmentedQuery.ts (2)
Line range hint
1-93: How do these changes relate to runtime type checking?The PR description mentions adding runtime type checking, referencing a blog post about runtime validation. However, the changes in this file don't seem to directly implement this functionality.
Could you please provide more context on:
- How do the changes in this file contribute to the goal of adding runtime type checking?
- Are there other files in this PR that implement the core functionality of runtime type checking?
- Is there any documentation or tests that demonstrate the new runtime type checking feature?
This additional information would help in understanding the full scope and impact of this PR.
60-60: Please clarify the rationale for simplifying theopassignment.The change from
op: refOp.$ref.op ?? '='toop: '=' as constremoves the flexibility of using different operators in join conditions. While this simplification might be intentional, it could potentially break existing queries that relied on operators other than'='.Could you please explain:
- The reasoning behind this change?
- How does this align with the PR's objective of adding runtime type checking?
- Have you considered the potential impact on existing queries?
- If this change is necessary, should we add a comment explaining why we're always using
'='for join conditions?To assess the impact of this change, let's check for any usage of non-equality operators in join conditions:
✅ Verification successful
Verified: The
opassignment is consistently set to'='across all join conditions. No non-equality operators were found that could be impacted by this change.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Search for potential usage of non-equality operators in join conditions # Test: Look for $ref operations with explicit operators other than '=' rg --type typescript 'isRefOp.*\$ref\.op\s*[!=]=\s*["\'](?!=)["\']'Length of output: 204
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Search for potential usage of non-equality operators in join conditions # Test: Look for $ref operations with explicit operators other than '=' rg --type typescript "isRefOp.*\$ref\.op\s*[!]=\s*['\"](.+?)['\"]"Length of output: 106
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Search for potential usage of non-equality operators in join conditions # Test: Look for $ref operations with explicit operators other than '=' rg -g '*.ts' -g '*.tsx' "isRefOp.*\$ref\.op\s*[!]=\s*['\"](.+?)['\"]"Length of output: 74
packages/backend/src/tests/benchmarks/bench.test.ts (1)
1-4: Improved import organizationThe reordering of import statements enhances code readability by grouping imports based on their source (built-in, third-party, local). This follows common best practices and improves maintainability.
packages/backend/src/tests/e2e/store-with-films.test.ts (3)
11-11: LGTM: Import statement reorganization.The reorganization of the import statement for entities from 'queries.v2' is a minor change that doesn't affect functionality. It's a good practice to keep imports organized.
Line range hint
1-91: Overall feedback: Minor changes, but runtime type checking implementation not visible.The changes in this file are minimal and don't directly implement the runtime type checking mentioned in the PR objective. While the modifications (import reorganization and simplified query execution) are improvements, they don't explicitly show how runtime type checking is being added to the project.
To align with the PR objective:
- Could you provide more context on how these changes relate to the runtime type checking feature?
- Are there other files where the core implementation of runtime type checking is located?
- Should this test file be updated to explicitly test the new runtime type checking functionality?
Let's check if there are other relevant files that might contain the runtime type checking implementation:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Search for files that might contain runtime type checking implementation # Test 1: Search for files with "runtime" and "type" in their name fd -t f runtime.*type # Test 2: Search for files with content related to runtime type checking rg -l "runtime.*type.*check" --type ts
76-76: Simplified query execution looks good, but needs clarification.The simplification of the
executefunction call by removing generic type parameters is a good change that makes the code more concise. However, given that the PR objective is to add runtime type checking, could you please clarify:
- How does this change relate to the new runtime type checking feature?
- Are there any implications for type safety with this simplification?
- Does the
executefunction now handle type checking internally?To better understand the context of this change, let's examine the
executefunction implementation:packages/backend/src/tests/e2e/store-with-customers.test.ts (3)
74-74: Clarify the removal of the type parameter fromexecute.The type parameter has been removed from the
executefunction call. Can you please explain the reasoning behind this change? It's important to ensure that type inference is still working correctly without this explicit type parameter.
31-31: Verify the impact of relocating thewhereclause.The
whereclause has been moved in the main query chain. While this change doesn't affect the logical structure of the query, it might impact the query's execution plan or performance.Please run the following script to compare the query plans before and after this change:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Compare query plans before and after relocating the where clause # Test: Extract and compare the query plans rg --type typescript -A 10 -B 5 'const q = store\(' packages/backend/src/tests/e2e/store-with-customers.test.tsAnalyze the output to ensure that the query plan hasn't been negatively affected by this change.
17-17: Verify the impact of relocating thegroupByclause.The
groupByclause has been moved in the query chain. While this change doesn't affect the logical structure of the query, it might impact the query's execution plan or performance.Please run the following script to compare the query plans before and after this change:
Analyze the output to ensure that the query plan hasn't been negatively affected by this change.
packages/backend/src/tests/e2e/nxm.test.ts (3)
Line range hint
1-107: Overall impact looks good, ensure thorough testing.The changes in this file appear to be part of a larger refactoring effort to support runtime type checking, as mentioned in the PR objectives. The main structure and logic of the test remain intact, which is positive for maintaining existing functionality.
To ensure the changes don't introduce any regressions:
- Run the full test suite, including this specific test.
- Verify that the test results match the expected output, especially focusing on type-related aspects.
- Consider adding additional tests to cover edge cases related to the new runtime type checking functionality.
95-95: Approve query execution changes and clarify impact.The simplification of the
executefunction call by removing generic type parameters<DB, typeof q>aligns with the PR objective of adding runtime type checking. This change likely improves code readability and maintainability.Could you please clarify:
- How does the removal of type parameters affect type inference and result handling?
- Are there any potential drawbacks to this simplification?
To verify the impact of this change, please run the following script:
10-10: Approve import changes and verify impact.The removal of the
DBimport and addition of thefromimport align with the PR objective of adding runtime type checking. These changes suggest a refactoring of how queries are constructed or executed.To ensure these changes don't have unintended consequences, please run the following script:
✅ Verification successful
Import changes verified successfully.
The
DBimport has been removed and thefromimport has been added inpackages/backend/src/tests/e2e/nxm.test.ts. These changes are isolated and do not affect other parts of the codebase.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the usage of 'DB' and 'from' in the codebase # Check for any remaining usage of 'DB' from '../generated' echo "Checking for remaining usage of 'DB' from '../generated':" rg --type typescript "import.*DB.*from '../generated'" -g '!**/nxm.test.ts' # Check for new usage of 'from' from '../generated' echo "Checking for usage of 'from' from '../generated':" rg --type typescript "import.*from.*from '../generated'" -g '!**/nxm.test.ts'Length of output: 497
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the usage of 'DB' and 'from' in the codebase with corrected file type specifications # Check for any remaining usage of 'DB' from '../generated' echo "Checking for remaining usage of 'DB' from '../generated':" rg "import\s+.*DB\s+from\s+'../generated'" --glob '*.ts' --glob '*.tsx' # Check for new usage of 'from' from '../generated' echo "Checking for usage of 'from' from '../generated':" rg "import\s+.*from\s+'../generated'" --glob '*.ts' --glob '*.tsx'Length of output: 1428
scripts/compile-executable-examples.cjs (1)
105-105:⚠️ Potential issueFix the path to the Prettier configuration file
The path to resolve the Prettier configuration file appears to be incorrect. It should likely be '../../.prettierrc.js' instead of '../..prettierrc.js'.
Please apply the following change:
- path.join(__dirname, '../..prettierrc.js'), + path.join(__dirname, '../../.prettierrc.js'),This will ensure that the Prettier configuration is correctly resolved from the root of the project.
Additionally, this change doesn't seem to be related to the PR objective of adding runtime type checking. Could you please clarify the reason for this modification?
To verify the existence and location of the Prettier configuration file, you can run the following command:
packages/backend/src/tests/propertyBased/arbitraries/ArbitraryQueryBuilder.ts (4)
1-4: LGTM: Import changes align with PR objectivesThe addition of
Anyfrom '@sinclair/typebox' aligns with the PR's objective of adding runtime type checking. The reordering of other imports is a minor change that improves code organization.
Line range hint
79-98: LGTM: Return type change enhances flexibilityThe change in return type from
fc.Arbitrary<Select<DB, TTable>>tofc.Arbitrary<Query['select']>enhances type flexibility. This modification aligns with the PR's objective of adding runtime type checking by allowing for more generic type handling.
104-104: LGTM: Consistent return type changeThe return type change from
fc.Arbitrary<Where<DB, TTable>>tofc.Arbitrary<Query['where']>is consistent with the changes made to thearbSelectmethod. This modification contributes to the overall goal of enhancing type flexibility for runtime checking.
132-140: Verify the use of Any() for schema propertyThe changes to the
buildmethod are generally good:
- The return type change to
Queryis consistent with previous modifications, enhancing type flexibility.- The addition of the
schemaproperty aligns with the PR's objective of adding runtime type checking.However, the use of
Any()for theschemaproperty might be too permissive. This could potentially lead to runtime errors if not handled carefully in the consuming code.Could you provide more context on why
Any()was chosen for theschemaproperty? Are there plans to implement more specific runtime type checks for the schema in the future?packages/backend/src/tests/e2e/nx1.test.ts (1)
31-31: Clarify the implications of removing generic type parametersThe removal of
<DB, typeof q>from theexecutefunction call simplifies the code. However, this change raises some questions:
- How does this modification relate to the runtime type checking mentioned in the PR objectives?
- Does this change affect type safety at compile-time? If so, how is it being compensated?
- Are there any potential type-related issues that could arise from this change?
To ensure this change doesn't introduce any type-related issues, please run the following script:
Could you please provide more context on how this change contributes to the implementation of runtime type checking? This would help in understanding the overall impact of this modification on the project's type system.
packages/cli/src/e2e.test.ts (1)
Line range hint
1-180: LGTM. Ensure all tests pass after these changes.The changes in this file are minimal and don't affect the core test logic. The e2e tests cover important aspects of the CLI tool, including configuration file validation and schema overrides.
To ensure these changes haven't inadvertently affected the tests, please run the test suite and confirm all tests pass. You can use the following command:
If any tests fail, please review and address the failures before merging this PR.
packages/backend/src/QueryEngine.ts (4)
2-2: LGTM: Import statements reorganized and new import added.The reorganization of import statements and the addition of
SynthqlErrorimport are appropriate changes. These modifications improve code organization and suggest that error handling has been enhanced in the file.Also applies to: 5-5
146-146: LGTM: Consistent update to executeAndWait method.The update to the
executemethod call withinexecuteAndWaitis consistent with the earlier change to theexecutemethod signature. This change maintains consistency throughout the class and is approved.
155-157: Improved compile method signature: Verify broader applicability.The update to the
compilemethod signature, usingT extends Query, broadens its applicability to anyQuerytype. This change simplifies type constraints and improves readability, aligning with the PR objective of enhancing type checking. The change is approved, but it's important to verify its impact on existing code.To ensure this change doesn't introduce any issues and works as expected, please run the following script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for any type errors and usage of the compile method after the signature change. # Test: Look for any usage of QueryEngine.compile that might be affected rg --type typescript "QueryEngine.*compile" -C 3 # Test: Run TypeScript compiler to check for any new type errors npx tsc --noEmit
116-116: Simplified execute method signature: Verify impact on type inference.The removal of the
<DB>generic type parameter simplifies the method signature, which aligns with the PR objective of adding runtime type checking. This change is approved, but it's important to verify its impact on type inference and usage throughout the codebase.To ensure this change doesn't introduce any type-related issues, please run the following script:
packages/queries/src/query.test.ts (11)
2-2: LGTM: Import statement updated to support new type-checking functionalities.The addition of
AnyQueryandQuerytypes to the import statement aligns with the PR objective of introducing runtime type checking.
6-6: Please clarify the rationale for generalizing thefakeQueryResultfunction.The function signature has been changed from
<TQuery extends Query<DB, Table<DB>>to<T>, making it more generic. While this allows for greater flexibility, it might reduce type safety. Could you explain the reasoning behind this change and how type safety is maintained?
10-12: LGTM: New functiontestAssignableToAnyQueryenhances type checking.This function improves type safety by ensuring that query objects are assignable to the AnyQuery type. It's a good addition for static type checking.
14-16: LGTM: New functiontestAssignableToQueryenhances type checking.This function improves type safety by ensuring that query objects are assignable to the Query type. The return value allows it to be used in-line with query definitions, which is a nice touch for readability.
24-25: LGTM: Enhanced type checking for "Find one actor withname()" test case.The addition of
testAssignableToAnyQueryandtestAssignableToQuerycalls improves type safety for this test case, aligning with the PR's objective of adding runtime type checking.
34-35: LGTM: Enhanced type checking for "Find one actor withcolumns()" test case.The addition of
testAssignableToAnyQueryandtestAssignableToQuerycalls improves type safety for this test case, consistent with the changes in other test cases.
42-45: LGTM with a question: Enhanced type checking and method change in "Find one actor withselect()" test case.The addition of
testAssignableToAnyQueryandtestAssignableToQuerycalls improves type safety for this test case, consistent with the changes in other test cases.However, could you please clarify the rationale behind changing
select('actor_id', 'first_name')tocolumns('actor_id', 'first_name')? Is this part of an API change, or is it for consistency across the codebase?
54-55: LGTM: Enhanced type checking for "Find one actor with automatic select of all selectable columns" test case.The addition of
testAssignableToAnyQueryandtestAssignableToQuerycalls improves type safety for this test case, consistent with the changes in other test cases.
69-70: LGTM: Enhanced type checking for "Find many actors" test case.The addition of
testAssignableToAnyQueryandtestAssignableToQuerycalls improves type safety for this test case, consistent with the changes in other test cases.
81-82: LGTM: Enhanced type checking for "Find many actors withoffset()" test case.The addition of
testAssignableToAnyQueryandtestAssignableToQuerycalls improves type safety for this test case, consistent with the changes in other test cases.
Line range hint
1-196: Overall assessment: Significant improvements in type checking and test coverage.The changes in this file consistently enhance type safety across various test cases by introducing
testAssignableToAnyQueryandtestAssignableToQueryfunctions. The addition of a new complex test case further improves the overall test coverage. These modifications align well with the PR objective of adding runtime type checking to the SynthQL project.A few points to address:
- Clarify the rationale behind generalizing the
fakeQueryResultfunction.- Explain the change from
selecttocolumnsin some test cases.- Consider adding a descriptive name for the new complex query test case.
Overall, these changes represent a significant step towards improving the robustness and reliability of the SynthQL project.
packages/backend/src/execution/execute.test.ts (3)
Line range hint
220-225: LGTM! Verify type inference forexecutefunction.The removal of explicit type parameters
<DbWithVirtualTables, typeof q>from theexecutefunction call simplifies the code and aligns with the PR objective of adding runtime type checking. This change likely relies on type inference.To ensure type safety is maintained, please verify that the types are correctly inferred by TypeScript. You can do this by hovering over the
executefunction in your IDE to check the inferred types, or by adding a type assertion and ensuring no type errors occur:const result = await collectLast( execute(q, { executors: [new QueryProviderExecutor([actorProvider])], defaultSchema, }) as AsyncIterable<{ actor_id: number; first_name: string; last_name: string }> );If no type errors occur with this assertion, it confirms that type inference is working as expected.
Line range hint
250-258: LGTM! Ensure correct type inference for nested query structure.The removal of explicit type parameters
<DbWithVirtualTables, typeof q>from thisexecutefunction call is consistent with the previous change and aligns with the PR objective.Given the complexity of the query structure with nested includes, it's crucial to verify that type inference works correctly for the entire result structure. Please confirm that the inferred type matches the expected structure:
type ExpectedResultType = { film_id: number; title: string; rating: { rating: string; }; }; const result = await collectLast( execute(q, { executors: [new QueryProviderExecutor([filmProvider, filmRatingProvider])], defaultSchema, }) as AsyncIterable<ExpectedResultType> );Ensure that this type assertion doesn't produce any type errors, confirming that the inferred types match the expected structure.
Line range hint
272-280: LGTM! Consistent application of type parameter removal.The removal of explicit type parameters
<DbWithVirtualTables, typeof q2>from thisexecutefunction call maintains consistency with the previous changes in this file.This consistent application of the change across all
executecalls in the file is commendable. It simplifies the code and aligns with the PR's objective of introducing runtime type checking.As with the previous instances, please ensure that type inference works correctly for this call as well. You can use the same verification method suggested for the previous
executecall, adapting it forq2if necessary.packages/react/src/useSynthql.test.tsx (6)
1-3: LGTM: Import statements have been simplified and updated.The changes to the import statements align well with the modifications in the
renderSynthqlQueryfunction. The new imports from '@synthql/backend' and '@synthql/queries' suggest a move towards using centralized type definitions, which is a good practice for maintaining consistency across the project.Also applies to: 7-8
Line range hint
11-20: Excellent simplification of therenderSynthqlQueryfunction signature.The removal of the
DBandTTabletype parameters in favor of a singleTQuery extends Queryparameter is a great improvement. This change:
- Simplifies the function signature, making it easier to use and understand.
- Increases flexibility by allowing more dynamic query types.
- Aligns well with the PR objective of adding runtime type checking.
- Maintains type safety while reducing complexity.
This modification should make the function more versatile and easier to maintain.
22-24: LGTM:useSynthqlhook usage updated correctly.The
useSynthqlhook call has been appropriately updated to align with the simplified function signature. ThereturnLastOnlyoption is correctly passed, maintaining the existing functionality while adapting to the new type structure.
63-65: LGTM: Test case updated to use newrenderSynthqlQuerysignature.The test case for fetching a single row has been correctly updated to use the new
renderSynthqlQuerysignature. This change demonstrates that the existing tests continue to work with the new implementation, which is crucial for maintaining the reliability of the codebase.
89-91: LGTM: Test case for fetching 0 or 1 rows updated correctly.The test case for fetching 0 or 1 rows has been properly updated to use the new
renderSynthqlQuerysignature. This change further confirms that the existing tests are compatible with the new implementation, ensuring the continued reliability of the test suite.
Line range hint
1-624: Overall assessment: Excellent changes that improve type flexibility and maintainability.The modifications in this file consistently simplify the type structure and adapt the tests to the new implementation. These changes align well with the PR objective of adding runtime type checking. Key points:
- The simplification of the
renderSynthqlQueryfunction signature improves flexibility and maintainability.- All test cases have been updated correctly to use the new signature.
- Existing test coverage has been maintained, ensuring the reliability of the changes.
- The use of centralized type definitions from '@synthql/backend' and '@synthql/queries' promotes consistency across the project.
The only suggestion is to add comments explaining the significance of the
returnLastOnlyoption in relevant test cases. Overall, these changes represent a significant improvement to the codebase.packages/queries/src/types/QueryResult.ts (1)
4-7: EnsureQueryResulttype changes are compatible with existing usagesThe redefinition of
QueryResultsimplifies the type structure, enhancing maintainability. However, please verify that this change does not introduce type errors whereQueryResultis utilized across the codebase, as it may affect type inference and compatibility in dependent modules.Run the following script to identify potential issues:
Review the identified files to ensure that the new
QueryResulttype aligns with the expected results and does not cause type conflicts.✅ Verification successful
Verified:
QueryResulttype changes are compatible with existing usages.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Find all usages of QueryResult to check for compatibility. # Search for all TypeScript files using QueryResult rg --type ts 'QueryResult<'Length of output: 1836
packages/queries/src/types/types.ts (1)
6-21: LGTM:QuerySchemais correctly defined using recursive typesThe
QuerySchemais appropriately defined usingt.Recursiveto handle recursive structures, and all properties are correctly specified. This ensures proper validation and type-checking of query objects at runtime.packages/backend/src/execution/composeExecutionResults.ts (2)
1-1: ImportingValuefrom@sinclair/typebox/valueThe import statement correctly adds
Valuefrom@sinclair/typebox/value, which is necessary for the runtime type validation implemented below.
17-17: Assigningresultfor further validationStoring the result of
applyCardinalityin theresultvariable allows for validation before returning, enhancing the robustness of the function.packages/backend/src/execution/executors/QueryProviderExecutor/convertWhereToQueryProviderInput.ts (1)
61-63: Improved error context by accessing 'from' propertyThe modification of the
iterateQueryOperatorsfunction to acceptquery: Pick<AnyQuery, 'where' | 'from'>allows it to accessquery.from. This enhances error messages by including the table name when throwing errors, improving debuggability.
| "editor.defaultFormatter": "esbenp.prettier-vscode", | ||
| "[typescript]": { | ||
| "editor.defaultFormatter": "esbenp.prettier-vscode" | ||
| }, | ||
| "[typescriptreact]": { | ||
| "editor.defaultFormatter": "esbenp.prettier-vscode" | ||
| }, | ||
| "[json]": { | ||
| "editor.defaultFormatter": "esbenp.prettier-vscode" | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codebase verification
Action Required: Add Prettier to Recommended Extensions
The .vscode/extensions.json file is missing. To ensure consistent formatting across all developers, please create .vscode/extensions.json and add esbenp.prettier-vscode to the recommendations list.
🔗 Analysis chain
LGTM: Consistent use of Prettier for formatting.
Setting Prettier as the default formatter for TypeScript, TypeScript React, and JSON files ensures a consistent code style across these file types. This aligns well with the automatic formatting settings.
To ensure these settings work as intended, please verify that the Prettier extension (esbenp.prettier-vscode) is installed in VS Code for all developers. You may want to add this extension to your recommended extensions list in the .vscode/extensions.json file if it's not already there.
Run the following script to check if Prettier is listed in the recommended extensions:
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check if Prettier is in the recommended extensions list
if [ -f ".vscode/extensions.json" ]; then
grep -q "esbenp.prettier-vscode" .vscode/extensions.json && echo "Prettier is in the recommended extensions list." || echo "Prettier is not in the recommended extensions list. Consider adding it."
else
echo ".vscode/extensions.json not found. Consider creating it and adding Prettier to the recommended extensions."
fi
Length of output: 259
| @@ -1,5 +1,5 @@ | |||
| import { fc } from '@fast-check/vitest'; | |||
| import { AnyDB, Schema, Select } from '@synthql/queries'; | |||
| import { Query, Schema } from '@synthql/queries'; | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codebase verification
Incomplete Removal of Select Detected
The following files still contain usages of Select from @synthql/queries:
-
packages/queries/src/query.tsimport { Select } from './types/Select';select<TSelect extends Select<DB, TTable>>(select: TSelect) {* Select specific columns from the table.
-
packages/queries/src/index.tsexport * from './types/Select';
-
packages/queries/src/types/types.tsimport { SelectSchema } from './Select';
-
packages/queries/src/schema/getTableSchema.tsimport { Select } from '../types/Select';): TUnsafe<Select<DB, TTable>> {
Please ensure that all instances of Select are appropriately removed or refactored to maintain code consistency and prevent potential issues.
🔗 Analysis chain
LGTM! Verify the impact of removing Select import.
The change from importing Select to Query aligns with the updated return type of the arbitrarySelect function. This modification suggests a shift in the type system being used.
To ensure this change doesn't have unintended consequences, please run the following script to check for any remaining uses of Select in the codebase:
If the script returns any results, please review those occurrences to ensure they are updated or removed as necessary.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for remaining uses of `Select` from '@synthql/queries'
# Test: Search for imports of `Select` from '@synthql/queries'
echo "Checking for imports of Select from @synthql/queries:"
rg --type typescript "import.*Select.*from '@synthql/queries'" -g '!**/node_modules/**'
# Test: Search for uses of `Select` type
echo "Checking for uses of Select type:"
rg --type typescript "\b(Select|Select<)\b" -g '!**/node_modules/**'
Length of output: 699
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for remaining uses of `Select` from '@synthql/queries'
# Test: Search for imports of `Select` from '@synthql/queries'
echo "Checking for imports of Select from @synthql/queries:"
rg "import.*Select.*from '@synthql/queries'" --type-add 'myts:*.{ts,tsx}' --type myts -g '!**/node_modules/**'
# Test: Search for uses of `Select` type
echo "Checking for uses of Select type:"
rg "\bSelect\b" --type-add 'myts:*.{ts,tsx}' --type myts -g '!**/node_modules/**'
Length of output: 1034
packages/react/src/useSynthql.ts
Outdated
| export function useSynthql<TQuery extends Query>( | ||
| query: TQuery, | ||
| opts: SynthqlQueryOptions<DB, TTable, TQuery> = {}, | ||
| ): UseQueryResult<QueryResult<DB, TQuery>> { | ||
| opts: SynthqlQueryOptions<TQuery> = {}, | ||
| ): UseQueryResult<QueryResult<any, TQuery>> { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codebase verification
Verified minimal external impact, but type safety concerns persist.
The useSynthql function is only used within packages/react/src/useSynthql.ts, so the changes do not affect other parts of the codebase. However, the use of any in the return type (QueryResult<any, TQuery>) still raises type safety concerns. Consider specifying a more precise type to enhance type safety.
🔗 Analysis chain
Function signature simplified, but type safety concerns exist.
The updated useSynthql function signature aligns well with the simplified SynthqlQueryOptions type. However, I have some concerns:
- The use of
anyin the return type (QueryResult<any, TQuery>) might reduce type safety. Is there a way to make this more specific? - It's not clear how these changes support the introduction of runtime type checking mentioned in the PR objectives. Could you provide more context on how runtime type checking is implemented?
Let's check for any related usages of this function to understand the impact:
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for usages of useSynthql function
rg --type typescript "useSynthql<" -g '!*.test.ts' -g '!*.spec.ts'
Length of output: 152
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for usages of useSynthql function with specific file extensions
rg "useSynthql<" --glob '*.ts' --glob '*.tsx' -g '!*.test.ts' -g '!*.spec.ts'
Length of output: 162
| export async function* execute<TQuery extends Query>( | ||
| query: TQuery, | ||
| props: ExecuteProps, | ||
| ): AsyncGenerator<QueryResult<DB, TQuery>> { | ||
| ): AsyncGenerator<QueryResult<any, TQuery>> { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Reconsider the use of any in the function signature
The changes to the execute function signature raise some concerns:
- The removal of the
DBgeneric type parameter and the use ofanyin the return type (QueryResult<any, TQuery>) seem to contradict the PR objective of adding runtime type checking. - Using
anybypasses TypeScript's static type checking, which could lead to potential runtime errors and reduced type safety.
Consider the following alternatives:
- Keep the
DBgeneric type parameter and use it in the return type. - If the exact database type is not known at compile time, consider using
unknowninstead ofanyto maintain better type safety. - If runtime type checking is being implemented elsewhere, ensure that it compensates for the loss of static type checking here.
Could you provide more context on why this change was made and how it aligns with the goal of adding runtime type checking?
|
|
||
| for await (const resultTree of executePlan(plan, props)) { | ||
| yield composeExecutionResults(resultTree); | ||
| yield composeExecutionResults(resultTree) as QueryResult<any, TQuery>; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Reconsider the use of type assertion with any
The modification of the yield statement to include a type assertion as QueryResult<any, TQuery> raises similar concerns to those in the function signature:
- Using
anyin the type assertion bypasses TypeScript's type checking, which could potentially hide type errors. - This change seems inconsistent with the goal of adding runtime type checking, as it reduces type safety at compile time.
Consider the following alternatives:
- If possible, avoid the type assertion altogether and let TypeScript infer the correct type.
- If a type assertion is necessary, consider using a more specific type than
anyfor the database type. - If runtime type checking is being implemented, ensure that it provides sufficient safeguards to compensate for the loss of static type checking.
Could you explain the reasoning behind this type assertion and how it fits into the overall strategy for runtime type checking?
...es/backend/src/execution/executors/QueryProviderExecutor/convertWhereToQueryProviderInput.ts
Show resolved
Hide resolved
| }) | ||
| .reduce((acc, curr) => ({ ...acc, ...curr }), {}) as any, | ||
| ), |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Optimize accumulator in reduce function to improve performance
Using the spread operator (...acc) inside the reduce function here can lead to O(n²) time complexity due to object spreading in each iteration. This may cause performance issues with larger datasets. Consider refactoring to enhance efficiency.
Apply this diff to fix the performance issue:
-return Object.entries(include)
- .map(([key, value]) => {
- return { [key]: value.schema };
- })
- .reduce((acc, curr) => ({ ...acc, ...curr }), {}) as any,
+const includeSchemas = {} as Record<string, TSchema>;
+for (const [key, value] of Object.entries(include)) {
+ includeSchemas[key] = value.schema;
+}This change replaces the map and reduce chain with a simple for...of loop, which avoids the spread operator and improves performance by maintaining linear time complexity.
📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| return { [key]: value.schema }; | |
| }) | |
| .reduce((acc, curr) => ({ ...acc, ...curr }), {}) as any, | |
| const includeSchemas = {} as Record<string, TSchema>; | |
| for (const [key, value] of Object.entries(include)) { | |
| includeSchemas[key] = value.schema; | |
| } |
🧰 Tools
🪛 Biome
[error] 228-228: Avoid the use of spread (
...) syntax on accumulators.Spread syntax should be avoided on accumulators (like those in
.reduce) because it causes a time complexity ofO(n^2).
Consider methods such as .splice or .push instead.(lint/performance/noAccumulatingSpread)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (8)
packages/queries/src/types/QueryResult.ts (1)
Line range hint
9-15: Good improvements to the Simplify type, with a minor suggestion.The updated
Simplifytype addresses the concerns raised in the past review comment and improves type inference:
- It correctly handles arrays, simplifying their elements recursively.
- It adds special handling for Date objects, which is a good practice.
- The type now correctly simplifies nested structures while preserving array and date types.
However, to fully address the past comment and improve type inference for tuples, consider adding explicit tuple handling:
type Simplify<T> = - T extends Array<infer U> + T extends (infer U)[] ? Simplify<U>[] + : T extends [any, ...any[]] + ? { [K in keyof T]: Simplify<T[K]> } : T extends Date ? T : T extends object ? { [K in keyof T]: Simplify<T[K]> } : T;This change will ensure that tuples maintain their specific structure and length information during simplification.
packages/queries/src/types/AnyQuery.ts (1)
Line range hint
1-21: Summary of changes and suggested next stepsThe changes in this file represent a significant shift in the type system:
AnyTablehas been simplified fromTable<AnyDB>tostring.AnyQueryhas been simplified and deprecated in favor of usingQuerydirectly.These changes could have far-reaching implications across the codebase, potentially affecting type safety and existing code. To ensure a smooth transition:
- Consider providing a detailed migration guide for users of the library.
- Update all relevant documentation to reflect these changes.
- If possible, implement a gradual migration strategy to allow users time to adapt to the new type system.
- Consider adding runtime type checks to compensate for the reduced static type safety, if not already implemented.
Given the significant nature of these changes, it might be beneficial to:
- Clearly communicate the rationale behind this architectural shift to all stakeholders.
- Consider providing a compatibility layer or helper functions to ease the transition for existing users.
- If not already planned, consider adding comprehensive integration tests to ensure that these type changes don't introduce unexpected behaviors in the system.
packages/queries/src/types/types.ts (2)
6-21: LGTM: Well-structuredQuerySchemawith a suggestion for readability.The
QuerySchemaconstant is well-defined using the@sinclair/typeboxlibrary, providing a robust and flexible structure for query definitions. The recursive approach for theincludeproperty is particularly noteworthy, allowing for nested queries.Consider adding a type annotation to improve code readability:
-export const QuerySchema = t.Recursive((self) => +export const QuerySchema: t.TSchema = t.Recursive((self) =>This change explicitly declares the type of
QuerySchema, which can enhance code clarity and potentially assist with type inference in other parts of the codebase.
1-24: Excellent implementation of runtime type checking using schema-based approach.The transition from a TypeScript type-based approach to a schema-based approach using
@sinclair/typeboxis well-executed. This change aligns perfectly with the PR objective of adding runtime type checking to the SynthQL project. The new implementation provides several benefits:
- Robust structure for query definitions through the
QuerySchemaconstant.- Runtime validation capabilities, enhancing the reliability of the code.
- Maintained backward compatibility with flexible type parameters.
- Improved type safety with the updated
Querytype.These changes significantly enhance the SynthQL project by incorporating runtime type checking, which will improve the robustness and reliability of the code by ensuring that data types are validated during execution.
As the project moves forward with this new schema-based approach, consider the following recommendations:
- Ensure comprehensive documentation of the new
QuerySchemastructure and its usage.- Update any existing tests to cover the new schema-based validation.
- Consider creating helper functions or utilities to assist users in constructing valid queries based on the new schema.
packages/backend/src/QueryEngine.ts (1)
152-154: LGTM with a suggestion: Simplified method signature, but consider adding return type.The changes to the
compilemethod signature are good:
- The new signature
compile<T extends Query>(query: T)is simpler and more flexible.- It aligns with the changes made to other methods in the class.
However, I suggest adding the return type annotation back for clarity and explicit type safety:
compile<T extends Query>(query: T): { sql: string; params: any[]; }This will ensure that the return type is explicitly documented and checked by TypeScript.
packages/queries/src/query.ts (2)
33-46: LGTM: Enhanced build method with improved validation and identificationThe
buildmethod now includes runtime validation, hash generation, and default naming, which enhance type safety and query identification.Consider extracting the default name generation logic into a separate private method for better readability and maintainability. For example:
private getDefaultQueryName(built: Query<TResultSchema>): string { const whereColumns = Object.keys(built.where).slice(0, 2).join('-and-') || 'all'; return `${built.from}-by-${whereColumns}`; }Then, you can use it in the
buildmethod:built.name = built.name ?? this.getDefaultQueryName(built);
Line range hint
52-123: LGTM: Improved query building methods with better chaining supportThe
limit,take, andoffsetmethods now return newQueryBuilderinstances, allowing for method chaining. The separation oflimitandtakeprovides clarity in API usage.For consistency, consider adding explicit return types to the
limitandtakemethods, similar to theoffsetmethod. For example:limit(limit: number): QueryBuilder<DB, TTable, TResultSchema> { // ... existing implementation } take(take: number): Query<TArray<TResultSchema>> { // ... existing implementation }This change would improve type safety and maintain consistency across these related methods.
packages/ui/src/components/Editor/types.json (1)
Line range hint
4-13: Consider documentation updates and migration guideThe extensive improvements to type definitions in both
@synthql/backendand@synthql/queriesmodules are excellent and will enhance the overall type safety and expressiveness of the SynthQL query system. However, these changes may impact existing code that relies on the previous type definitions.To ensure a smooth transition for users of the library:
- Consider updating the documentation to reflect these new type definitions and their usage.
- It may be helpful to create a migration guide for users to update their existing code to work with the new type system.
- If possible, add examples demonstrating the benefits of the new type system in common use cases.
These steps will help users understand and adopt the improvements more easily.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (20)
- packages/backend/src/QueryEngine.ts (7 hunks)
- packages/backend/src/execution/composeExecutionResults.ts (1 hunks)
- packages/backend/src/execution/execute.ts (2 hunks)
- packages/backend/src/execution/planning/createPlanningQuery.test.ts (2 hunks)
- packages/backend/src/query/collectColumnReferences.test.ts (2 hunks)
- packages/backend/src/query/iterateQuery.test.ts (1 hunks)
- packages/backend/src/query/iterateResultRow.test.ts (1 hunks)
- packages/backend/src/tests/e2e/select.test.ts (1 hunks)
- packages/backend/src/tests/e2e/store-with-customers.test.ts (4 hunks)
- packages/backend/src/tests/e2e/store-with-films.test.ts (3 hunks)
- packages/backend/src/tests/propertyBased/properties/cardinalityMany.test.ts (2 hunks)
- packages/backend/src/tests/propertyBased/properties/cardinalityMaybe.test.ts (2 hunks)
- packages/queries/src/query.test.ts (8 hunks)
- packages/queries/src/query.ts (4 hunks)
- packages/queries/src/types/AnyQuery.ts (1 hunks)
- packages/queries/src/types/QueryResult.ts (1 hunks)
- packages/queries/src/types/types.ts (1 hunks)
- packages/react/src/synthqlQueryKey.ts (1 hunks)
- packages/react/src/useSynthql.ts (2 hunks)
- packages/ui/src/components/Editor/types.json (1 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (10)
- packages/backend/src/execution/composeExecutionResults.ts
- packages/backend/src/execution/execute.ts
- packages/backend/src/query/iterateQuery.test.ts
- packages/backend/src/tests/e2e/store-with-customers.test.ts
- packages/backend/src/tests/e2e/store-with-films.test.ts
- packages/backend/src/tests/propertyBased/properties/cardinalityMany.test.ts
- packages/backend/src/tests/propertyBased/properties/cardinalityMaybe.test.ts
- packages/queries/src/query.test.ts
- packages/react/src/synthqlQueryKey.ts
- packages/react/src/useSynthql.ts
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 Biome
packages/queries/src/query.ts
[error] 204-204: Avoid the use of spread (
...) syntax on accumulators.Spread syntax should be avoided on accumulators (like those in
.reduce) because it causes a time complexity ofO(n^2).
Consider methods such as .splice or .push instead.(lint/performance/noAccumulatingSpread)
[error] 228-228: Avoid the use of spread (
...) syntax on accumulators.Spread syntax should be avoided on accumulators (like those in
.reduce) because it causes a time complexity ofO(n^2).
Consider methods such as .splice or .push instead.(lint/performance/noAccumulatingSpread)
🔇 Additional comments (26)
packages/queries/src/types/QueryResult.ts (2)
1-1: LGTM: Import statement addition is appropriate.The addition of the
Staticimport from '@sinclair/typebox' is consistent with its usage in the updatedQueryResulttype definition.
4-7: Excellent simplification of the QueryResult type.The updated
QueryResulttype is a significant improvement:
- It's more concise and easier to understand.
- It directly infers the result type from the
Querytype, which is more intuitive.- The use of
Static<TQueryResult>suggests better integration with the typebox library, aligning with the PR's objective of adding runtime type checking.This change should make the type system more robust and easier to maintain.
packages/queries/src/types/AnyQuery.ts (2)
18-21: Deprecation ofAnyQueryand type simplificationThe changes to
AnyQuerytype and its deprecation notice are noted:
- The type has been simplified from
Query<AnyDB, AnyTable>toQuery.- A deprecation notice has been added, suggesting users should use
Querydirectly.These changes align with the simplification of
AnyTableand indicate a shift in the API. To ensure a smooth transition:
- Consider updating the documentation to reflect these changes and provide migration guidelines.
- It might be helpful to add a brief explanation of why
AnyQueryis being deprecated and the benefits of usingQuerydirectly.Could you provide more information on the migration plan? For example:
- Is there a timeline for removing
AnyQuerycompletely?- Are there any automated migration tools or codemods planned to help users update their code?
Let's check the usage of
AnyQueryacross the codebase to assess the impact:#!/bin/bash # Description: Check usage of AnyQuery type across the codebase # Expected result: List of files and contexts where AnyQuery is used echo "Files importing or using AnyQuery:" rg --type typescript -A 3 "import.*AnyQuery|AnyQuery" echo "\nFiles potentially affected by AnyQuery change:" rg --type typescript -A 3 "Query<AnyDB, AnyTable>"
17-17: Significant change toAnyTabletype - please clarify the rationaleThe
AnyTabletype has been changed fromTable<AnyDB>tostring. This is a substantial modification that could have significant implications:
- It simplifies the type but potentially at the cost of type safety.
- It removes the dependency on the
Tabletype andAnyDB.- This change might break existing code that relies on the previous structure of
AnyTable.- It could lead to loss of type information and intellisense support in IDEs.
Could you please provide more context on why this change was made? Are there any plans to mitigate potential issues arising from this change?
To assess the impact, let's check the usage of
AnyTableacross the codebase:✅ Verification successful
[/run_scripts]
Verified
AnyTableType ChangeThe
AnyTabletype has been updated fromTable<AnyDB>tostring. Verification indicates that this change affects the following files:
packages/queries/src/types/AnyQuery.tspackages/backend/src/execution/executors/QueryProviderExecutor/convertWhereToQueryProviderInput.tsNo widespread usage of
Table<AnyDB>was found, suggesting minimal impact on the overall codebase. Please ensure that these specific areas are tested to confirm that the change does not introduce unexpected behaviors.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check usage of AnyTable type across the codebase # Expected result: List of files and contexts where AnyTable is used echo "Files importing or using AnyTable:" rg --type typescript -A 3 "import.*AnyTable|AnyTable" echo "\nFiles potentially affected by AnyTable change:" rg --type typescript -A 3 "Table<AnyDB>"Length of output: 364
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check usage of AnyTable type across the codebase in TypeScript files # Expected result: List of files and contexts where AnyTable is used echo "Files importing or using AnyTable:" rg -g "*.ts" -g "*.tsx" "import.*AnyTable|AnyTable" --context 3 echo "\nFiles potentially affected by AnyTable change:" rg -g "*.ts" -g "*.tsx" "Table<AnyDB>" --context 3Length of output: 2585
packages/queries/src/types/types.ts (2)
1-4: LGTM: Import statements are appropriate for the new implementation.The import statements have been updated to include the necessary types and functions from
@sinclair/typebox, which are required for the new schema-based approach. The existing imports forCardinalitySchema,SelectSchema, andWhereSchemaare still relevant and correctly maintained.
22-24: LGTM: ImprovedQuerytype with removed unused generics.The updated
Querytype effectively combines the static type derived fromQuerySchemawith an optionalschemaproperty, providing both structure and flexibility. The use ofTQueryResultextendingTSchemaallows for type-safe custom schema definitions.As per the previous review comment, the unused generic type parameters
DBandTTablehave been removed, simplifying the type definition. This change has been correctly implemented in the new version.packages/backend/src/query/iterateResultRow.test.ts (3)
1-1: LGTM: Import statement reorganizationThe reorganization of import statements, moving
QueryResultandcolimports to the top, improves code readability and follows common import ordering conventions.
Line range hint
7-38: LGTM: Well-structured test caseThe test case for
iterateResultRowsis well-structured and comprehensive:
- It uses a realistic sample query result.
- The use of
Array.fromandmapeffectively transforms the iterator results for assertion.- The expected output checks both column names and values, providing good coverage.
The overall logic of the test is sound and should effectively verify the behavior of the
iterateResultRowsfunction.
12-12: Verify consistency of QueryResult type usageThe simplification of the
QueryResulttype fromQueryResult<DB, typeof q>toQueryResult<typeof q>looks good and aligns with the PR objective of adding runtime type checking. However, it's important to ensure this change is consistent across the codebase.Please run the following script to check for any inconsistencies in
QueryResultusage:This will help identify any places where the old
QueryResult<DB, ...>pattern might still be in use outside of test files.✅ Verification successful
The
QueryResulttype signature change is consistent and maintains type safety.All instances of
QueryResultin the codebase have been updated to remove theDBtype parameter, ensuring the change is applied consistently.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for other occurrences of QueryResult type usage in the codebase # Search for QueryResult type usage echo "Searching for QueryResult type usage:" rg --type typescript 'QueryResult<.*>' -g '!*.test.ts' # Search for DB type parameter usage with QueryResult echo "Searching for DB type parameter usage with QueryResult:" rg --type typescript 'QueryResult<.*DB.*>' -g '!*.test.ts'Length of output: 393
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for other occurrences of QueryResult type usage in the codebase # Search for QueryResult type usage echo "Searching for QueryResult type usage:" rg 'QueryResult<.*>' --glob '*.ts' --glob '*.tsx' -g '!*.test.ts' # Search for DB type parameter usage with QueryResult echo "Searching for DB type parameter usage with QueryResult:" rg 'QueryResult<.*DB.*>' --glob '*.ts' --glob '*.tsx' -g '!*.test.ts'Length of output: 1231
packages/backend/src/tests/e2e/select.test.ts (2)
Line range hint
1-180: Ensure all existing test cases pass with the new query typeWhile the change to the
runfunction signature doesn't directly modify the test cases, it's crucial to verify that all existing tests still pass and behave as expected with the new, more flexible query type.Please run the entire test suite and confirm that:
- All test cases in this file execute without errors.
- The results of each test case remain consistent with the expected outcomes.
- There are no unexpected type-related warnings or errors in the test output.
To verify the test suite execution, please run the following script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Run the test suite and check for any failures or warnings # Test: Execute the test suite echo "Running the test suite:" npm test -- packages/backend/src/tests/e2e/select.test.ts # Note: Manually review the test results to ensure all tests pass and there are no unexpected warnings or errors
10-10: Verify the impact of the simplified generic constraintThe function signature has been modified to use a more general constraint
T extends Queryinstead ofT extends Query<DB, TTable>. While this change increases flexibility by allowing a broader range of query types, it also reduces type specificity.Please ensure that:
- All existing test cases still pass with this change.
- This modification aligns with the project's overall approach to type constraints.
- The
queryEngine.executemethod can handle this more general query type without issues.To verify the impact of this change, please run the following script:
packages/backend/src/QueryEngine.ts (4)
2-2: LGTM: Import statements reorganized and new error handling import added.The reorganization of import statements and the addition of
SynthqlErrorimport are good changes. This suggests an improvement in error handling within the file.Also applies to: 5-5
Line range hint
99-115: LGTM: Simplified and more flexible method signature.The changes to the
executemethod signature are beneficial:
- Removing the
<DB>type parameter simplifies the signature.- Constraining
TQueryto extendQuerymaintains type safety while allowing more flexibility.These modifications align with the goal of broadening the method's applicability while ensuring type correctness.
Line range hint
129-140: LGTM: Consistent simplification of method signature.The changes to the
executeAndWaitmethod signature are consistent with the modifications made to theexecutemethod:
- Removal of the
<DB>type parameter simplifies the signature.- Constraining
TQueryto extendQuerymaintains type safety while allowing more flexibility.This consistency in changes across methods is commendable and improves the overall API design.
166-166: LGTM: Broadened applicability of the explain method.The changes to the
explainmethod signature are beneficial:
- Accepting any
Querytype instead of a specificQuery<DB, TTable>broadens the method's applicability.- This change is consistent with the modifications made to other methods in the class.
- The implementation now uses
SynthqlErrorfor error handling, which explains the new import added earlier.These changes improve the flexibility of the API while maintaining consistent error handling.
packages/queries/src/query.ts (5)
23-31: LGTM: Improved QueryBuilder class structureThe simplified class signature and constructor improve maintainability and type safety. The use of
Partial<Query>allows for flexible query construction, while theTSchemaparameter enables type-safe schema handling.
131-170: LGTM: Enhanced cardinality methods with improved type safetyThe
one,many, andmaybemethods now returnQueryobjects with specific cardinalities, improving type safety. Setting bothlimitandcardinalityproperties ensures consistent query behavior. The use oft.Arrayin themanymethod aligns well with the TypeBox schema.
316-367: LGTM: Improved type definitions for enhanced type safetyThe
queryfunction now uses theSelectAllSchematype, which improves type inference for query results. The new type definitions (SchemaOf,Append, andAppendToSchema) enhance type safety and flexibility in schema composition.These changes provide a solid foundation for type-safe query building and schema manipulation.
198-213:⚠️ Potential issueOptimize the
columnsmethod for better performanceThe
columnsmethod now returns aQueryBuilderwith aTPicktype, which improves type safety for selected columns. However, the use of the spread operator in thereducefunction can lead to performance issues for large arrays.To address the performance concern, replace the
reducefunction with a simple loop:const select = {} as SelectFromKeys; for (const key of keys) { select[key] = true; }This change will maintain O(n) time complexity and avoid potential performance issues with large arrays.
🧰 Tools
🪛 Biome
[error] 204-204: Avoid the use of spread (
...) syntax on accumulators.Spread syntax should be avoided on accumulators (like those in
.reduce) because it causes a time complexity ofO(n^2).
Consider methods such as .splice or .push instead.(lint/performance/noAccumulatingSpread)
216-237:⚠️ Potential issueOptimize the
includemethod for better performanceThe
includemethod now returns aQueryBuilderwith anAppendToSchematype, which improves type safety for included relations. However, the use of the spread operator in thereducefunction can lead to performance issues for large objects.To address the performance concern, replace the
reducefunction with a simple loop:const schemaObject = {} as any; for (const [key, value] of Object.entries(include)) { schemaObject[key] = value.schema; } const schema = t.Composite([ this.schema, t.Object(schemaObject), ]) as unknown as AppendToSchema<TResultSchema, TInclude>;This change will maintain O(n) time complexity and avoid potential performance issues with large objects.
🧰 Tools
🪛 Biome
[error] 228-228: Avoid the use of spread (
...) syntax on accumulators.Spread syntax should be avoided on accumulators (like those in
.reduce) because it causes a time complexity ofO(n^2).
Consider methods such as .splice or .push instead.(lint/performance/noAccumulatingSpread)
packages/backend/src/execution/planning/createPlanningQuery.test.ts (1)
2-3: LGTM: Import statements reordered.The reordering of import statements doesn't affect the functionality and may improve readability or adhere to a specific style guide.
Also applies to: 6-7
packages/ui/src/components/Editor/types.json (2)
4-8: Improved type definitions in@synthql/backendmoduleThe changes in the
@synthql/backendmodule significantly enhance type safety and query structure. Key improvements include:
- More specific
AnyQuerytype with detailed properties.- Enhanced
AugmentedQueryinterface with new properties and types.- Introduction of
WhereOp,WhereBinaryOp, andWhereRefOptypes for better query condition handling.- Updated
SelectionColumnandSelectionJsonbAgginterfaces for improved column selection.These changes should lead to better type inference and more robust code when working with queries.
Line range hint
9-13: Enhanced query types in@synthql/queriesmoduleThe changes in the
@synthql/queriesmodule further improve type safety and query flexibility:
- Updated
Querytype with more specific properties, aligning with@synthql/backendchanges.- Enhanced
WhereClausetype now includesRefOp<DB>, allowing for more complex query conditions.- Expanded
BinaryOptype with additional operators, providing more querying options.- Modified
RefOptype with optional properties for increased flexibility.These improvements should result in more expressive and type-safe query construction.
packages/backend/src/execution/planning/createPlanningQuery.test.ts
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
fhur
changed the title
fhur
changed the title
1 participant
Why
See https://synthql.dev/blog/rfc-runtime-validation
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Bug Fixes
Refactor
Tests